This paper presents a fluid–structure iteration method applied as a study case to a conventional transport aircraft with wing aspect ratio of 12. It evaluates the nonlinear structure effect on the calculation of static limit loads. The numerical tool presented herein is named E2-FSI, which stands for nonlinear high-fidelity static fluid–structure iteration, developed for high flexibility static aeroelastic evaluations. A discussion about the use and the applicability of high-fidelity static fluid–structure iteration for the calculation of static loads is presented as part of the conclusion, for both current and future conventional transport aircraft.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Bradley MK, Droney CK (2011) Subsonic ultra green aircraft research: phase I final report. NASA
Afonso F, Vale J, Oliveira E, Lau F, Suleman A (2017) A review on non-linear aeroelasticity of high aspect-ratio wings. Prog Aerosp Sci 89:40–57
Tang D, Dowell EH (2001) Experimental and theoretical study on aeroelastic response of high-aspect-ratio wings. AIAA J 39(8):1430–1441
Lambert LA, Cooper JE, Nangia RK (2016) Buckling alleviation for joined-wing aircraft. J Aircr 53(3):811–821
Castellani M, Cooper JE, Lemmens Y (2017) Nonlinear static aeroelasticity of high-aspect-ratio-wing aircraft by finite element and multibody methods. J Aircr 54(2):548–560
Brooks TR, Martins JRRA (2016) High-fidelity aerostructural optimization of a high aspect ratio tow-steered composite wing. AIAA SciTech Forum, San Diego
Kenway GKW, Martins JRRA (2015) High-fidelity aerostructural optimization considering buffet onset. AIAA AVIATION Forum, Dallas
Huixue D, Zhichun Y, Yi L (2010) Accelerated loosely-coupled CFD/CSD method for nonlinear static aeroelasticity analysis. Aerospace Science and Technology, Elsevier Limited, Amsterdam
Hermanutz A, Hornung M (2017) High fidelity trim calculation under consideration of aeroelastic effects of a high aspect ration swept wing. IFASD 2017
Cesnik CES, Palacios R, Reichenbach EY (2014) Reexamined structural design procedures for very flexible aircraft. J Aircr 51(5):1580–1591
Kitson RC, Cesnik CES (2015) Aeroelastic modeling and simulation of flexible jet transport aircraft with high-aspect-ratio wings. International forum on aerolasticity and structural dynamics – IFASD at Saint Petersburg, Russia
Bartels RE, Scott RC, Funk CJ, Allen TJ, Sexton BW (2014) Computed and experimental flutter/LCO onset for the boeing truss-braced wing wind-tunnel model. In: 32st AIAA
Bartels RE, Scott RC, Allen TJ, Sexton BW (2015) Aeroelastic analysis of SUGAR truss-braced wing wind-tunnel model using FUN3D and a nonlinear structural model. In: s.l.: 56th AIAA
Eberhardt S, Benedict K, Hedges L, Robinson A, Tinoco EN (2014) Inclusion of aeroelastic twist into the CFD analysis of the twin-engine NASA common research model. In: AIAA SciTech
Keye S, Rudnik R (2015) Validation of wing deformation simulations for the NASA CRM model using fluid–structure interaction computations. In: 53rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA SciTech Forum
NASA 6th AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop. Available at: https://aiaa-dpw.larc.nasa.gov. Published on 2016. Accessed 03 June 2017
Bauchau OA, Hong CH (1988) Nonlinear composite beam theory. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 55(1):156–163
Levy R, Spillers WR (1995) Analysis of geometrically nonlinear structures. ISBN 978-94-017-0243-0. Chapman & Hall, New York
Verri AA, Morais KC, Bussamra FLS, Becker GG, Cesnik CES (2018) Static loads evaluation in a flexible aircraft using high fidelity fluid–structure iteration tool (E2-FSI). In: 31st congress of the international council of the aeronautical sciences—ICAS 2018
EMBRAER S/A Official Embraer website. Available at: https://embraer.com. Accessed 07 June 2018 at 16:00 h
Metacomp Metacomp Technologies. http://www.metacomptech.com. Accessed 24 May 2018 at 13:00 h
MSC Nastran software version 2016R1. http://www.mscsoftware.com/product/msc-nastran. Accessed 18 Jan 2017 at 7:00 h
Verri AA, Jorge CT, Bizarro AF, Bussamra FLS, Júnior HNS, Cesnik CES (2018) Multidisciplinary methods for wing flight shape analysis—effect of the geometric nonlinear structure for static pull-up. In: 31st congress of the international council of the aeronautical sciences—ICAS 2018
Vinberg EB (2003) A course in algebra, graduate studies in mathematics, vol 56. American Mathematical Society, Providence
CFD ++ User Manual, version 14.0. Metacomp Technologies, Agoura Hills, CA. 2016
Goldberg UC, Peroomian O, Chakravarthy SA (1998) Wall-distance free K-E model with enhanced near-wall treatment. Am Soc Mech Eng J Fluids Eng 120:457–462
Spalart PR, Allmaras SR (1994) A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. In: Recherche Aerospatiale
Clarke AJ (1987) An introduction to aircraft buffet and buffeting. ESDU 87012
Harten A, Lax PD, Leer BV (1983) On upstream differencing and Godunov type methods for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Rev 25(1):35–61
Tinoco EN, Brodersen OP, Keye S, Laflin KR, Feltrop E, Vassberg JC, Mani M, Rider B, Wahls RA, Morrison JH, Hue D, Roy CJ, Mavriplis DJ, Murayama M (2018) Summary data from the sixth AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop: CRM cases. J Aircr 55(4):1352–1379
MSC (2016) MSC Nastran 2016. Reference manual
Martins PHC, Bussamra FLS, Lucena Neto E (2017) Three dimensional hybrid-Trefftz stress finite elements for plates and shells. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5715
MSC. MSC Nastran (2016) Nonlinear user’s guide SOL 400, 2016
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Technical Editor: André Cavalieri.
About this article
Cite this article
Verri, A.A., Bussamra, F.L.S., de Morais, K.C. et al. Static loads evaluation in a flexible aircraft using high-fidelity fluid–structure iteration tool (E2-FSI): extended version. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42, 79 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-2154-4
- Static loads
- Structural analysis
- High flexibility