Advertisement

A theoretical nanofluid analysis exhibiting hydromagnetics characteristics employing CVFEM

  • S. Mondal
  • A. S. DogonchiEmail author
  • N. Tripathi
  • M. WaqasEmail author
  • Seyyed Masoud Seyyedi
  • M. Hashemi-Tilehnoee
  • D. D. Ganji
Technical Paper
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

The heat transfer properties of current liquids are specifically improved by suspending nanocrystalline solid elements smaller than 100 nm in diameter. These liquids are considered as potential working fluids for applications such as car radiators, solar collectors, electronic frost systems, nuclear reactors and heat pipes. Due to such uses, here we formulate CuO–H2O nanofluids in a two-dimensional circular geometry with a rhombus-shaped barrier maintaining the constant temperature of two adjacent high walls. The streamlines and isotherms have been plotted using the control volume finite element method and applying the KKL model for nanofluid simulation. The results were calculated for different concentrations of nanoparticles, Hartmann number and Rayleigh number. It was found that in a large number of volume fraction and Hartmann number, the isotherms near the outer margin are more prominent while the low-volume-concentration isotherms are concentrated near the adiabatic wall of the obstacle. It was also found that there is a temperature gradient in the radial direction at a higher volume fraction and Hartmann number (Ha). The temperature gradient was limited to adiabatic walls of the obstruction in lower volume fraction and Ha. Two similar shapes but differently directed eddies are formed for any value of Ra in streamlines. |Ψmax|nf increases with an increase in the values of Ra from 103 to 105.

Keywords

Nanofluid Natural convection Magnetic field CVFEM KKL 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Eastman JA, Choi SUS, Li S, Yu W, Thompson LJ (2001) Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nano-fluids containing copper nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 78:718–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rajarathinam M, Nithyadevi N, Chamkha AJ (2017) Heat transfer enhancement of mixed convection in an inclined porous cavity using Cu–water nanofluid. Adv Powder Technol 29:590–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tiwari RK, Das MK (2007) Heat transfer augmentation in a two-sided lid-driven differentially heated square cavity utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50:2002–2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Iwatsu R, Hyun J, Kuwahara K (1993) Mixed convection in a driven cavity with a stable a stable vertical temperature gradient. Int J Heat Mass Transf 36:1601–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahdavi M, Sharifpur M, Ghodsinezhad H, Meyer JP (2016) Experimental and numerical study of the thermal and hydrodynamic characteristics of laminar natural convective flow inside a rectangular cavity with water, ethylene glycol–water and air. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 78:50–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koo J, Kleinstreuer C (2004) Viscous dissipation effects in micro tubes and micro channels. Int J Heat Mass Transf 47:3159–3169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koo J (2004) Computational nanofluid flow and heat transfer analyses applied to microsystems. Ph.D thesis, NC State University, Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koo J, Kleinstreuer C (2005) Laminar nanofluid flow in microheat-sinks. Int J Heat Mass Transf 48:2652–2661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dogonchi AS, Ganji DD (2016) Study of nanofluid flow and heat transfer between non-parallel stretching walls considering Brownian motion. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 69:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dogonchi AS, Ganji DD (2016) Thermal radiation effect on the nano-fluid buoyancy flow and heat transfer over a stretching sheet considering Brownian motion. J Mol Liq 223:521–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mastiani M, Kim MM, Nematollahi A (2017) Density maximum effects on mixed convection in a square lid-driven enclosure filled with Cu–water nanofluids. Adv Powder Technol 28:197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mahapatra TR, Pal D, Mondal S (2013) Mixed convection flow in an inclined enclosure under magnetic field with thermal radiation and heat generation. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 41:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dogonchi AS, Tayebi T, Chamkha AJ, Ganji DD (2019) Natural convection analysis in a square enclosure with a wavy circular heater under magnetic field and nanoparticles. J Therm Anal Calorim.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08408-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dogonchi AS, Hashim (2019) Heat transfer by natural convection of Fe3O4–water nanofluid in an annulus between a wavy circular cylinder and a rhombus. Int J Heat Mass Transf 130:320–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seyyedi SM, Dogonchi AS, Nuraei R, Ganji DD, Hashemi-Tilehnoee M (2019) Numerical analysis of entropy generation of a nanofluid in a semi-annulus porous enclosure with different nanoparticle shapes in the presence of a magnetic field. Eur Phys J Plus 134:268.  https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12623-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dogonchi AS, Waqas M, Seyyedi SM, Hashemi-Tilehnoee M, Ganji DD (2019) Numerical simulation for thermal radiation and porous medium characteristics in flow of CuO–H2O nanofluid. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41:249.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1752-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dogonchi AS, Waqas M, Ganji DD (2019) Shape effects of copper-oxide (CuO) nanoparticles to determine the heat transfer filled in a partially heated rhombus enclosure: CVFEM approach. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 107:14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dogonchi AS, Selimefendigil F, Ganji DD (2019) Magneto-hydrodynamic natural convection of CuO–water nanofluid in complex shaped enclosure considering various nanoparticle shapes. Int J Numer Meth Heat Fluid Flow 29:1663–1679.  https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-06-2018-0294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghasemi E, Soleimani S, Bayat M (2013) Control volume based finite element method study of nano-fluid natural convection heat transfer in an enclosure between a circular and a sinusoidal cylinder. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 14:521–532.  https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2012-0177 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seyyedi SM, Dogonchi AS, Ganji DD, Hashemi-Tilehnoee M (2019) Entropy generation in a nanofluid-filled semi-annulus cavity by considering the shape of nanoparticles. J Therm Anal Calorim.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08130-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ghasemi E, Soleimani S, Bararnia H (2012) Natural convection between a circular enclosure and an elliptic cylinder using control volume based finite element method. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 39:1035–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seyyedi SM, Dogonchi AS, Hashemi-Tilehnoee M, Asghar Z, Waqas M, Ganji DD (2019) A computational framework for natural convective hydromagnetic flow via inclined cavity: an analysis subjected to entropy generation. J Mol Liq 287:110863.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.04.140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dogonchi AS, Armaghani T, Chamkha AJ, Ganji DD (2019) Natural convection analysis in a cavity with an inclined elliptical heater subject to shape factor of nanoparticles and magnetic field. Arab J Sci Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03956-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dogonchi AS, Chamkha AJ, Ganji DD (2019) A numerical investigation of magneto-hydrodynamic natural convection of Cu–water nanofluid in a wavy cavity using CVFEM. J Therm Anal Calorim 135:2599–2611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khanafer K, Vafai K, Lightstone M (2003) Buoyancy-driven heat transfer enhancement in a two dimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46:3639–3653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    De Vahl Davis G (1962) Natural convection of air in a square cavity, a benchmark numerical solution. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 3:249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Mondal
    • 1
  • A. S. Dogonchi
    • 2
    Email author
  • N. Tripathi
    • 3
  • M. Waqas
    • 4
    Email author
  • Seyyed Masoud Seyyedi
    • 2
  • M. Hashemi-Tilehnoee
    • 2
  • D. D. Ganji
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsAmity University, KolkataNewtownIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aliabad Katoul BranchIslamic Azad UniversityAliabad KatoulIran
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringAmity University, KolkataNewtownIndia
  4. 4.NUTECH School of Applied Sciences and HumanitiesNational University of TechnologyIslamabadPakistan
  5. 5.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentBabol Noshirvani University of TechnologyBabolIran

Personalised recommendations