Advertisement

Design and dimensional synthesis of a Linear Delta robot with single legs for additive manufacturing

  • Efrain RodriguezEmail author
  • Cristhian Riaño
  • Alberto Alvares
  • Renan Bonnard
Technical Paper
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Parallel manipulator robots are widely used in a large number of applications because they provide important advantages in terms of superior speeds and accelerations, high stiffness and good dynamic performance. In additive manufacturing (AM), this kind of kinematic structures is being increasingly explored to develop new curved and multi-directional fabrication strategies. Based on this application, this work presents the design and dimensional synthesis of a new structure of the Linear Delta parallel robot for AM (3D printing). The new structure uses an innovative concept of Delta mechanism with single legs and rotational joints, which consists of twelve links (three parallel single legs), three prismatic joints and eleven revolute joints. A particular feature of the proposed mechanism is that it contains a joint common to all the kinematic chains instead of a mobile platform as in the conventional Linear Delta structures. Mobility analysis, inverse and direct kinematics, and a study of dimensional synthesis are described in detail. A method of efficient optimization based on genetic algorithms is used to find the minimum dimensional parameters of the robot, considering the maximization of the useful workspace as the main performance index. In order to validate the proposal, a prototype of the robot was built. Capability and geometric deviations analysis was carried out for three test parts resulting in a 0.3-mm deviation/error within a confidence interval of 99.7%.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Parallel kinematic Linear Delta robot Dimensional optimization 3D printing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the financial support of the Brazilian government agency MEC/CAPES/CNPq/FAPDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Affi Z, Romdhane L, Maalej A (2004) Dimensional synthesis of a 3-translational-{DOF} in-parallel manipulator for a desired workspace. Eur J Mech A Solids 23(2):311–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2004.01.003 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen RJA, Trask RS (2015) An experimental demonstration of effective curved layer fused filament fabrication utilising a parallel deposition robot. Addit Manuf 8:78–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonnard R, Rodríguez E, Alvares AJ (2017) An advanced STEP-NC platform for additive manufacturing. In: Industrializing additive manufacturing: proceedings of additive manufacturing in products and applications—AMPA2017. Springer, Cham, pp 127–136.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66866-6_12
  4. 4.
    Boudreau R, Gosselin CM (1999) The synthesis of planar parallel manipulators with a genetic algorithm. J Mech Des 121(4):533.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2829494 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brinker J, Corves B, Takeda Y (2018) Kinematic performance evaluation of high-speed delta parallel robots based on motion/force transmission indices. Mech Mach Theory 125:111–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.11.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chablat D, Wenger P (2003) Architecture optimization of a 3-dof translational parallel mechanism for machining applications, the orthoglide. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 19(3):403–410.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TRA.2003.810242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chakraborty D, Aneesh Reddy B, Roy Choudhury A (2008) Extruder path generation for curved layer fused deposition modeling. Comput Aided Des 40(2):235–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2007.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen G, Wang H, Lin Z (2013) A unified approach to the accuracy analysis of planar parallel manipulators both with input uncertainties and joint clearance. Mech Mach Theory 64:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2013.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clavel R (1991) Conception d’un robot parallèle rapide à 4 degres de liberté. Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Courteille E, Deblaise D, Maurine P (2009) Design optimization of robot manipulators over global stiffness performance evaluation. In: International conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE, pp 5159–5166.  https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2009.5353906
  11. 11.
    Crump SS, Stratasys I (1989) Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects. U.S. Patent No. US5121329A. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5121329A/en
  12. 12.
    Erkaya S (2012) Investigation of joint clearance effects on welding robot manipulators. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 28(4):449–457.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2012.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2015) Introduction and basic principles. Springer, New York, pp 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISO 10303-238 (2007) Industrial automation systems and integration: product data representation and exchange—Part 238: application protocol: application interpreted model for computerized numerical controllersGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO 14649-1 (2003) Industrial automation systems and integration: physical device control—data model for computerized numerical controllers—Part 1: overview and fundamental principlesGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kanaan D, Wenger P, Caro S, Chablat D (2009) Singularity analysis of lower mobility parallel manipulators using Grassmann–Cayley algebra. IEEE Trans Robot 25(5):995–1004.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2009.2017132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kelaiaia R, Company O, Zaatri A (2012) Multiobjective optimization of a linear Delta parallel robot. Mech Mach Theory 50:159–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2011.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kosinska A, Galicki M, Kedzior K (2003) Designing and optimization of parameters of delta-4 parallel manipulator for a given workspace. J Robot Syst 20(9):539–548.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.10104 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Laribi MA, Romdhane L, Zeghloul S (2007) Analysis and dimensional synthesis of the DELTA robot for a prescribed workspace. Mech Mach Theory 42(7):859–870.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.06.012 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li Y, Xu Q (2006) A new approach to the architecture optimization of a general 3-PUU translational parallel manipulator. J Intell Robot Syst 46(1):59–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-006-9044-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu XJ, Wang J, Oh KK, Kim J (2004) A new approach to the design of a delta robot with a desired workspace. J Intell Robot Syst 39(2):209–225.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JINT.0000015403.67717.68 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Majou F, Gosselin C, Wenger P, Chablat D (2007) Parametric stiffness analysis of the orthoglide. Mech Mach Theory 42(3):296–311.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.03.018 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Merlet JP (1995) Designing a parallel manipulator for a specific workspace. INRIA 1:6–57zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pashkevich A, Chablat D, Wenger P (2006) Kinematics and workspace analysis of a three-axis parallel manipulator: the orthoglide. Robotica 24(1):39–49.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574704000347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pierrot F, Reynaud C, Fournier A (1990) Delta: a simple and efficient parallel robot. Robotica 8(02):105.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574700007669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Qian J (2009) Design and analysis of a three degrees of freedom (DOF) parallel manipulator with decoupled motions. Master’s Thesis, University of Ontario Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Riaño C, Peña C, Pardo A (2014) Approach in the optimal development of parallel robot for educational applications. In: Proceedings of the WSEAS international conference on recent advances in intelligent control, modelling and simulation (ICMS), vol 145Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rodriguez E (2018) Printing with the linear delta robot—demonstration. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPN57kHMeng
  29. 29.
    Rodriguez E, Riaño Jaimes C, Álvares AJ (2017) Projeto mecatrônico de um robô com cinemática paralela delta linear para manufatura aditiva. In: Proceedings of the IX Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia de Fabricação (COBEF). ABCM, pp 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.26678/ABCM.COBEF2017.COF2017-0282
  30. 30.
    Rodríguez E, Bonnard R, Alvares AJ (2017) Proposal of an advanced data model for STEP-NC compliant additive manufacturing. In: 24th ABCM international congress of mechanical engineering. Curitiba, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Singh R (2014) Process capability analysis of fused deposition modelling for plastic components. Rapid Prototyp J 20(1):69–76.  https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-02-2012-0018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Song X, Pan Y, Chen Y (2015) Development of a low-cost parallel kinematic machine for multidirectional additive manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng 137(2):21005.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028897 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stock M, Miller K (2003) Optimal kinematic design of spatial parallel manipulators: application to linear delta robot. J Mech Des 125(2):292.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1563632 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Taghirad HD (2013) Parallel robots mechanics and control, 1st edn. Taylor and Francis Group, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Uddin MJ, Refaat S, Nahavandi S, Trinh H (2004) Kinematic and dynamic modeling of a robotic head with linear motors. In: Proceedings: eight international conference on manufacturing and management: operations management and advanced technology : integration for success. PCMM, pp 879–884Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wahle M, Corves B (2011) Stiffness analysis of Clavel’s DELTA robot. In: Proceedings of intelligent robotics and applications: 4th international conference, ICIRA 2011, pp 240–249Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ye W, Fang Y, Guo S (2017) Design and analysis of a reconfigurable parallel mechanism for multidirectional additive manufacturing. Mech Mach Theory 112:307–326.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yuan Q, Ji S, Wang Z, Wang G, Wan Y, Zhan L (2008) Optimal design of the linear delta robot for prescribed cuboid dexterous workspace based on performance chart. In: Proceedings of the 8th WSEAS international conference on robotics, control and manufacturing technology, ROCOM’08. World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS), Stevens Point, Wisconsin, pp 35–41Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang L, Mei J, Zhao X, Huang T (2012) Dimensional synthesis of the Delta robot using transmission angle constraints. Robotica 30(03):343–349.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574711000622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhao Y (2013) Dimensional synthesis of a three translational degrees of freedom parallel robot while considering kinematic anisotropic property. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 29(1):169–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2012.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanic and Mechatronic Engineering DepartmentUniversity of BrasiliaBrasíliaBrazil
  2. 2.SENAI, SENAI/SC Innovation Institute for Laser Manufacturing, Manufacturing Systems and Embedded SystemsFlorianópolisBrazil

Personalised recommendations