Advertisement

Surface integrity of metal matrix nanocomposite produced by friction stir processing (FSP)

  • Navid Molla RamezaniEmail author
  • Behnam Davoodi
  • Mohammadreza Farahani
  • Abolfazl Hossein Khanli
Technical Paper
  • 90 Downloads

Abstract

Friction-stir processing is considered a green manufacturing process of surface composite fabrication and surface modification. Surface integrity includes different parameters such as roughness, topography, microhardness, and chemical analysis, which is one of the primary features of FSP. The goal of this research is to evaluate the surface integrity of FSP on aluminum matrix nanocomposite. The main parameter effects, including rotational speed, pass number, and the traverse speed on the surface roughness, surface topography, microhardness, and chemical analysis, were studied compressively. The obtained result revealed that the model of the quadratic polynomial is fitted to predict surface integrity. Furthermore, the results showed that the pass number and rotation speed 45.7% and 21.2%, respectively, have the most impact on surface roughness. The most impact on hardness belonged to traversing speed with 55%. Such a way, energy-dispersive spectroscopy analysis revealed that in the traverse speed 50 mm/min the microhardness achieve 127.24 Vickers.

Keywords

Friction stir processing (FSP) Surface integrity MMNC Al7075 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Kar KK, Rana S, Pandey J (2015) Handbook of polymer nanocomposites. Processing, performance and application. Volume B: carbon nanotube based polymer nanocomposites. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ajayan PM, Schadler LS, Braun PV (2006) Nanocomposite science and technology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rong M, Zhang M, Ruan W (2006) Surface modification of nanoscale fillers for improving properties of polymer nanocomposites: a review. Mater Sci Technol 22(7):787–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nalwa HS (1999) Handbook of nanostructured materials and nanotechnology, five-volume set. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shafiei-Zarghani A, Kashani-Bozorg S, Zarei-Hanzaki A (2011) Wear assessment of Al/Al2O3 nano-composite surface layer produced using friction stir processing. Wear 270(5–6):403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharifi S et al (2018) Leakage fault detection in electro-hydraulic servo systems using a nonlinear representation learning approach. ISA Trans 73:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davim, J.P., Surface integrity in machining. Vol. 1848828742. 2010: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Węglowski MS (2018) Friction stir processing—state of the art. Arch Civ Mech Eng 18(1):114–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mahmoud E, Ikeuchi K, Takahashi M (2008) Fabrication of SiC particle reinforced composite on aluminium surface by friction stir processing. Sci Technol Weld Join 13(7):607–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mohamed MA, Manurung YH, Berhan MN (2015) Model development for mechanical properties and weld quality class of friction stir welding using multi-objective Taguchi method and response surface methodology. J Mech Sci Technol 29(6):2323–2331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zuo L et al (2018) Effect of process parameters on surface topography of friction stir welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(5–8):1807–1816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar R et al (2017) Surface integrity analysis of abrasive water jet-cut surfaces of friction stir welded joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(5–8):1687–1701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aruri D et al (2013) Wear and mechanical properties of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy surface hybrid composites [(SiC + Gr) and (SiC + Al2O3)] fabricated by friction stir processing. J Mater Res Technol 2(4):362–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hajideh MR et al (2017) Investigation on the effects of tool geometry on the microstructure and the mechanical properties of dissimilar friction stir welded polyethylene and polypropylene sheets. J Manuf Process 26:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hajideh MR, Farahani M, Ramezani NM (2018) Reinforced dissimilar friction stir weld of polypropylene to acrylonitrile butadiene styrene with copper nanopowder. J Manuf Process 32:445–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rezaee Hajideh M et al (2017) Friction stir welding of dissimilar poly methyl methacrylate and polycarbonate sheets. J Mod Process Manuf Prod 6(4):35–46Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Çaydaş U, Hasçalik A (2008) Modeling and analysis of electrode wear and white layer thickness in die-sinking EDM process through response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38(11–12):1148–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Myers RH et al (2004) Response surface methodology: a retrospective and literature survey. J Qual Technol 36(1):53–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jafari J, Givi MKB, Barmouz M (2015) Mechanical and microstructural characterization of Cu/CNT nanocomposite layers fabricated via friction stir processing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(1–4):199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Asadi P, Faraji G, Besharati MK (2010) Producing of AZ91/SiC composite by friction stir processing (FSP). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(1–4):247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Asadi P et al (2012) On the role of cooling and tool rotational direction on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir processed AZ91. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63(9–12):987–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Asadi P et al (2012) Predicting the grain size and hardness of AZ91/SiC nanocomposite by artificial neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63(9–12):1095–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Natarajan U, Periyanan P, Yang S (2011) Multiple-response optimization for micro-endmilling process using response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56(1–4):177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Davoodi B, Eskandari B (2015) Tool wear mechanisms and multi-response optimization of tool life and volume of material removed in turning of N-155 iron–nickel-base superalloy using RSM. Measurement 68:286–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Palanivel R et al (2016) Tensile strength prediction of dissimilar friction stir-welded AA6351–AA5083 using artificial neural network technique. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 38(6):1647–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Molla Ramezani N et al (2016) Experimental study of tool wear and surface roughness on high speed helical milling in D2 steel. Modares Mech Eng 15(20):198–202Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Imani H et al (2016) The effect of hole making method on cutting force and surface roughness. Modares Mech Eng 15(20):285–290Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hassanpour H et al (2016) Investigation of surface roughness, microhardness and white layer thickness in hard milling of AISI 4340 using minimum quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod 120:124–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mahmoud ER et al (2010) Wear characteristics of surface-hybrid-MMCs layer fabricated on aluminum plate by friction stir processing. Wear 268(9–10):1111–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Faraji G, Asadi P (2011) Characterization of AZ91/alumina nanocomposite produced by FSP. Mater Sci Eng A 528(6):2431–2440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Barmouz M et al (2011) Investigation of mechanical properties of Cu/SiC composite fabricated by FSP: effect of SiC particles’ size and volume fraction. Mater Sci Eng A 528(3):1740–1749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ramezani NM et al (2019) Assessment of tool wear and mechanical properties of Al 7075 nanocomposite in friction stir processing (FSP). J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41(4):182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ramezani NM, Davoodi B, Hajideh MR (2018) Investigating the performance of coated carbide insert in hard steel helical milling. Int J Adv Des Manuf Technol 11(3):23–28Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Molla Ramezani N et al (2016) Helical milling of cold-work AISI D2 steel with PVD carbide tool under dry conditions. Modares Mech Eng 15(20):203–206Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ezilarasan C, Velayudham A (2013) Effect of machining parameters on surface integrity in machining Nimonic C-263 super alloy using whisker-reinforced ceramic insert. J Mater Eng Perform 22(6):1619–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Sustainable Manufacturing Systems Research Laboratory (SMSRL), School of Mechanical EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran
  3. 3.School of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations