Advertisement

Isotropic hardening curve characterization by the resultant profile of ball indentation tests

  • L. Q. Machado
  • L. MalcherEmail author
Technical Paper
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Traditionally, the material’s stress–strain relationship is acquired from uniaxial testing, which is widely used to describe its behavior under plastic deformation. When it comes to traditional hardness tests, such as in the Brinell, Knoop, Rockwell, and Vickers, they have been mostly used as a way to assess the capability a material has to resist plastic deformation. The technique developed and presented here has gone beyond that by determining other material properties in addition to hardness. This is performed by relating the applied load to the resultant indentation profile impressed in the material. Similar approaches have been devised aided by instrumented indentation devices. However, the methodology presented here does not require the use of such a device. It considers that the use of three configurations of the Brinell hardness test is enough to represent the material behavior within the boundaries of the plastic deformation experienced by it. Therefore, it is simpler than the usual approaches in this aspect. On the other hand, the indentation profile is also assessed along with the load–depth information obtained for each of those configurations. For that, a multi-image analysis of the indention impressions is performed in a confocal laser microscope. The indentation profile informs the amount of pile-up/sink-in experienced by the material. These phenomena are directly related to the strain hardening of the material and therefore influence the description of the plastic stress–strain curve. The extracted profiles are used as a reference with which the predicted output of repeated FEM modeling is compared. In this process, several trial stress–strain curves are provided to minimize the discrepancy between numerical and experimental data in an iterative FEM modeling of the indentation process. The process runs until reaching the established tolerance and thus providing the hardening parameters that best fit the experimental data. The SAE 1524 is analyzed in the present work employing the Kleinermann–Ponthot constitutive hardening model, which is composed of four parameters. It is shown that the determined parameters conform closely to the experimental data. Therefore, the procedure is viable for the material characterization task.

Keywords

Parameter identification Indentation test Indentation multi-image analysis Stress–strain curve 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Department of Mechanical Engineering of the University of Brasília and CNPq for providing them all the necessary to develop this research. Lucival Malcher would also like to acknowledge the support from the Brazilian Council for the Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq (contract 311933/2018-1).

References

  1. 1.
    Ahn JH, Kwon D (2001) Derivation of plastic stress–strain relationship from ball indentations: examination of strain definition and pileup effect. J Mater Res 16(11):3170–3178.  https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2001.0437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASTM Int. (2009) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials 1. ASTM, West Conshohocken, pp 1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1520/E0008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASTM Int. (2012) Standard test method for brinell hardness of metallic materials. ASTM, West Conshohocken, pp 1–32.  https://doi.org/10.1520/E0010-12.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bobzin K, Bagcivan N, Theiß S, Brugnara R, Perne J (2013) Approach to determine stress strain curves by FEM supported nanoindentation. Materialwiss Werkstofftech 44(6):571–576.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201300099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bolshakov A, Pharr G (1998) Influences of pileup on the measurement of mechanical properties by load and depth sensing indentation techniques. J Mater Res.  https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1998.0146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bucaille JL, Stauss S, Felder E, Michler J (2003) Determination of plastic properties of metals by instrumented indentation using different sharp indenters. Acta Mater 51(6):1663–1678.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00568-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chandler H (1999) Introduction to hardness testing. Hardness Test.  https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2001965 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chaudhri MM (1996) Subsurface plastic strain distribution around spherical indentations in metals. Philos Mag A 74(5):1213–1224.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01418619608239721 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dean J, Clyne TW (2017) Extraction of plasticity parameters from a single test using a spherical indenter and FEM modelling. Mech Mater 105:112–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.11.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giannakopoulos AE, Suresh S (1999) Determination of elastoplastic properties by instrumented sharp indentation. Scripta Mater 40(10):1191–1198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00011-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guillonneau G, Kermouche G, Bec S, Loubet J-L (2012) Determination of mechanical properties by nanoindentation independently of indentation depth measurement. J Mater Res 27(19):2551–2560.  https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2012.261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hertz H (1881) Ueber die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. Journal Fur Die Reine Und Angewandte Mathematik 92:156–171.  https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1882.92.156 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hills DA (1983) Some aspects of post-yield contact problems. Wear 85(1):107–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(83)90339-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huber MT (1904) Zur Theorie der Berührung fester elastischer Körper. Ann Phys 319(6):153–163.  https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19043190611 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson KL (1985) Contact Mechanics. J Am Chem Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3261297 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kang J (2013) Determination of elastic-plastic and visco-plastic material properties from instrumented indentation curves. University of Nottingham, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karthik V, Visweswaran P, Bhushan A, Pawaskar DN, Kasiviswanathan KV, Jayakumar T, Raj B (2012) Finite element analysis of spherical indentation to study pile-up/sink-in phenomena in steels and experimental validation. Int J Mech Sci 54(1):74–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kleinermann JP, Ponthot JP (2003) Parameter identification and shape/process optimization in metal forming simulation. J Mater Process Technol 139(1–3 SPEC):521–526.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00530-2 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leu DK (2011) Evaluation of friction coefficient using indentation model of Brinell hardness test for sheet metal forming. J Mech Sci Technol 25(6):1509–1517.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-0134-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li Y, Stevens P, Sun M, Zhang C, Wang W (2016) Improvement of predicting mechanical properties from spherical indentation test. Int J Mech Sci 117:182–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mesarovic SDJ, Fleck NA (1999) Spherical indentation of elastic-plastic solids. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 455(1987):2707–2728.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1999.0423 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Njeugna E, Ganou MBK, Ndapeu D, Foba JNT, Sikame NRT, Huisken PWM (2016) An Instrumented macro-indentation method for determining the mechanical properties of coconut shell (Coco Nucifera of Cameroon). Mech Mater Sci Eng.  https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1447.3846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res.  https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1992.1564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oliver WC, Pharr GM (2004) Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J Mater Res 19(01):3–20.  https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Olsson E, Larsson PL (2013) On the appropriate use of representative stress quantities at correlation of spherical contact problems. Tribol Lett 50(2):221–232.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-013-0114-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smithells CJ, Gale WF, Totemeier TC (eds) (2004) Smithells metals reference book, 8th edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tabor D (1948) A simple theory of static and dynamic hardness. Proc R Soc A Math, Phys Eng Sci 192(1029):247–274.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.0008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tabor D (1951) The hardness of metals. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tabor D (1970) The hardness of solids. Rev Phys Technol 1(3):145–179.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-6683/1/3/I01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taljat B, Pharr GM (2004) Development of pile-up during spherical indentation of elastic-plastic solids. Int J Solids Struct 41(14):3891–3904.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.033 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of TechnologyUniversity of BrasíliaBrasíliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations