Advertisement

Propagation of uncertainty in free vibration of Euler–Bernoulli nanobeam

  • Subrat Kumar Jena
  • S. ChakravertyEmail author
  • Rajarama Mohan Jena
Technical Paper

Abstract

In this paper, Euler–Bernoulli nanobeam based on the framework of Eringen’s nonlocal theory is modeled with material uncertainties where the uncertainties are associated with mass density and Young’s modulus in terms of fuzzy numbers. A particular type of imprecisely defined number, namely triangular fuzzy number, is taken into consideration. In this regard, double parametric-based Rayleigh–Ritz method has been developed to handle the uncertainties. Vibration characteristics have been investigated, and the propagation of uncertainties in frequency parameters is analyzed. Material uncertainties are considered with respect to three cases, viz. (1) Young’s modulus (2) mass density and (3) both Young’s modulus and mass density, as imprecisely defined. Frequency parameters and mode shapes are computed and presented for Pined–Pined (P–P) and Clamped–Clamped (C–C) boundary conditions. Accuracy and efficiency of the models are verified by conducting the convergence study for all the three cases. Lower and upper bounds of frequency parameters are computed with the help of the double parameter, and graphical results are plotted as the triangular fuzzy number showing the sensitivity of the models. Obtained results for frequency parameters are compared with other well-known results found in previously published literature(s) in special cases (crisp cases) witnessing robust agreement. The uncertainty modeling and the bounds of frequency parameters may serve as an effective tool for the designing and optimal quality enhancement of engineering structures.

Keywords

Imprecisely defined parameter Material uncertainties Triangular fuzzy number Uncertainty propagation Vibration Euler–Bernoulli beam Rayleigh–Ritz method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Defence Research & Development Organization(DRDO), Ministry of Defence, New Delhi, India (Sanction Code: DG/TM/ERIPR/GIA/17-18/0129/020) for the funding to carry out the present research work.

References

  1. 1.
    Malik M, Dang HH (1998) Vibration analysis of continuous systems by differential transformation. Appl Math Comput 96(1):17–26MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pradhan S, Murmu T (2010) Application of nonlocal elasticity and DQM in the flapwise bending vibration of a rotating nanocantilever. Physica E 42(7):1944–1949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang C, Zhang Y, He X (2007) Vibration of nonlocal Timoshenko beams. Nanotechnology 18:105–113Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S (2018) Free vibration analysis of Euler–Bernoulli nanobeam using differential transform method International Journal of Computational. Mater Sci Eng 7:1850020Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chakraverty S, Jena SK (2018) Free vibration of single walled carbon nanotube resting on exponentially varying elastic foundation. Curved Layer Struct 5:260–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S (2018) Free vibration analysis of variable cross-section single layered graphene nano-ribbons (SLGNRs) using differential quadrature method. Front Built Environ 4:63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S (2018) Free vibration analysis of single walled carbon nanotube with exponentially varying stiffness. Curved Layer Struct 5:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jena RM, Chakraverty S (2018) Residual power series method for solving time-fractional model of vibration equation of large membranes. J Appl Comput Mech 5:603–615Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S (2019) Differential quadrature and differential transformation methods in buckling analysis of nanobeams. Curved Layer Struct 6:68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S, Jena RM, Tornabene F (2019) A novel fractional nonlocal model and its application in buckling analysis of Euler-Bernoulli nanobeam. Mater Res Express 6(055016):1–17Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S, Tornabene F (2019) Vibration characteristics of nanobeam with exponentially varying flexural rigidity resting on linearly varying elastic foundation using differential quadrature method. Mater Res Express 6(085051):1–13Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S, Tornabene F (2019) Dynamical behavior of nanobeam embedded in constant, linear, parabolic and sinusoidal types of winkler elastic foundation using first-order nonlocal strain gradient model. Mater Res Express 6(0850f2):1–23Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jena RM, Chakraverty S, Jena SK (2019) Dynamic response analysis of fractionally damped beams subjected to external loads using homotopy analysis method. J Appl Comput Mech 5:355–366Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Behera L, Chakraverty S (2015) Application of differential quadrature method in free vibration analysis of nanobeams based on various nonlocal theories. Comput Math Appl 69(12):1444–1462MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reddy JN (2007) Nonlocal theories for bending, buckling and vibration of beams. Int J Eng Sci 45(2):288–307zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aydogdu M (2009) A general nonlocal beam theory: its application to nanobeam bending, buckling and vibration. Physica E 41(9):1651–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eltaher MA, Alshorbagy AE, Mahmoud FF (2013) Vibration analysis of Euler–Bernoulli nanobeams by using finite element method. Appl Math Model 37(7):4787–4797MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Özdemir Ö, Kaya MO (2006) Flapwise bending vibration analysis of a rotating tapered cantilever Bernoulli–Euler beam by differential transform method. J Sound Vib 289(1–2):413–420zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Özdemir Ö, Kaya MO (2006) Flapwise bending vibration analysis of double tapered rotating Euler–Bernoulli beam by using the differential transform method. Meccanica 41(6):661–670zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Challamel N, Wang CM (2008) The small length scale effect for a non-local cantilever beam: a paradox solved. Nanotechnology 19:345703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nguyen NT, Hui D, Lee J, Nguyen-Xuan H (2015) An efficient computational approach for size-dependent analysis of functionally graded nanoplates. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 297:191–218MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fernández-Sáez J, Zaera R, Loya JA, Reddy JN (2016) Bending of Euler–Bernoulli beams using Eringen’s integral formulation: a paradox resolved. Int J Eng Sci 99:107–116MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ansari R, Norouzzadeh A (2016) Nonlocal and surface effects on the buckling behavior of functionally graded nanoplates: an isogeometric analysis. Physica E 84:84–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Norouzzadeh A, Ansari R (2017) Finite element analysis of nano-scale Timoshenko beams using the integral model of nonlocal elasticity. Physica E 88:194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Norouzzadeh A, Ansari R, Rouhi H (2017) Pre-buckling responses of Timoshenko nanobeams based on the integral and differential models of nonlocal elasticity: an isogeometric approach. Appl Phys A 123:330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Norouzzadeh A, Ansari R, Rouhi H (2018) Isogeometric analysis of Mindlin nanoplates based on the integral formulation of nonlocal elasticity. Multidiscip Model Mater Struct 14:810–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ansari R, Torabi J, Norouzzadeh A (2018) Bending analysis of embedded nanoplates based on the integral formulation of Eringen’s nonlocal theory using the finite element method. Phys B 534:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Norouzzadeh A, Ansari R (2018) Isogeometric vibration analysis of functionally graded nanoplates with the consideration of nonlocal and surface effects. Thin Walled Struct 127:354–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Norouzzadeh A, Ansari R, Rouhi H (2019) An analytical study on wave propagation in functionally graded nano-beams/tubes based on the integral formulation of nonlocal elasticity. Waves Random Complex Media 28:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang DP, Lei Y, Shen ZB (2016) Vibration analysis of horn-shaped single-walled carbon nanotubes embedded in viscoelastic medium under a longitudinal magnetic field. Int J Mech Sci 118:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang DP, Lei Y, Shen ZB (2016) Free transverse vibration of double-walled carbon nanotubes embedded in viscoelastic medium. Acta Mech 227(12):3657–3670MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang DP, Lei YJ, Adhikari S (2018) Flexoelectric effect on vibration responses of piezoelectric nanobeams embedded in viscoelastic medium based on nonlocal elasticity theory. Acta Mech 229(6):2379–2392MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chakraverty S, Behera L (2016) Static and dynamic problems of nanobeams and nanoplates. World Scientific Publishing Co., SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hanss M, Turrin S (2010) A fuzzy-based approach to comprehensive modelling and analysis of systems with epistemic uncertainties. Struct Saf 32(6):433–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rao MVR, Pownuk A, Vandewalle S, Moens D (2010) Transient response of structures with uncertain structural parameters. Struct Saf 32(6):449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Farkas L, Moens D, Donders S, Vandepitte D (2012) Optimisation study of a vehicle bumper subsystem with fuzzy parameters. Mech Syst Signal Process 32(4):59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chang SL, Zadeh LA (1972) On fuzzy mapping and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 2(1):30–34MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dubois D, Prade H (1982) Towards fuzzy differential calculus: Part 3 differentiation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 8(3):225–233zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kaleva O (1990) The Cauchy problem for fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 35(3):389–396MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Khastan A, Nieto JJ, Rodrıguez-López R (2011) Variation of constant formula for first order fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 177(1):20–33MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mikaeilvand N, Khakrangin S (2012) Solving fuzzy partial differential equations by fuzzy two dimensional differential transform method. Neural Comput Appl 21(1):307–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Khastan A, Nieto JJ, Rodrıguez-López R (2013) Periodic boundary value problems for first order linear differential equations with uncertainty under generalized differentiability. Inf Sci 222(10):544–558MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tapaswini S, Chakraverty S (2014) Dynamic response of imprecisely defined beam subject to various loads using Adomian decomposition method. Appl Soft Comput 24:249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lv Z, Liu H (2017) Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded nanobeams with material uncertainties. Int J Mech Sci 134:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lv Z, Liu H (2018) Uncertainty modeling for vibration and buckling behaviors of functionally graded nanobeams in thermal environment. Compos Struct 184:1165–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liu H, Lv Z (2018) Uncertain material properties on wave dispersion behaviors of smart magneto-electro-elastic nanobeams. Compos Struct 202:615–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chakraverty S, Tapaswini S, Behera D (2016) Fuzzy differential equations and applications for engineers and scientists. CRC Press, Boca RatonzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chakraverty S, Tapaswini S, Behera D (2016) Fuzzy arbitrary order system: fuzzy fractional differential equations and applications. Wiley, HobokenzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Eringen AC (1972) Nonlocal polar elastic continua. Int J Eng Sci 10:1–16MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Subrat Kumar Jena
    • 1
  • S. Chakraverty
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rajarama Mohan Jena
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsNational Institute of Technology RourkelaRourkelaIndia

Personalised recommendations