Advertisement

Numerical study on the impact of the coupling of diffuser parameters on the performance of submersible pumps used in town water distribution systems

  • Qingshun WeiEmail author
  • Xihuan Sun
  • Asaad Y. Shamseldin
Technical Paper
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Diffusers are energy conversion devices in submersible pump structures, and they play a key role in improving the pump performance and operational stability. However, investigations pertaining to the factors influencing the performance of diffusers, in particular the effect of the coupling of factors on the performance of submersible pumps, are still rare. This study focuses on the effect of coupled parameters, such as the inlet angle, inlet width, axial length and number of blades of diffusers, for improving the performance of submersible pumps. First, the orthogonal test method is used to design the diffuser scheme, and sixteen models involving the coupling of different diffuser parameters are established and simulated. Next, the path analysis method is used to extensively understand the effect mode and influence degree of diffuser parameter coupling on the performance of submersible pumps. The results indicate that the mode of action of the diffuser parameters on the performance of the submersible pump can divided into two aspects: the direct action of the parameter itself and the indirect effect of the parameter coupling induced by other parameters. The orders of significance of the parameters affecting the head and efficiency are α3n > L > b3 > z and L > α3n > b3 > z, respectively. The contribution rates of the inlet angle, inlet width, axial length and number of blades to the pump efficiency are 31.56%, 16.53%, 37.05% and 14.86%, respectively. The numerical results show that the combination of the diffuser parameters—blade inlet angle of 30°, inlet width of 45 mm, axial length of 100 mm and number of blades equal to 8—can help realize the maximum efficiency (83.5%) of a submersible pump with a 18.9 m head. In the production design, the parameters can be quantitatively evaluated in advance by using path analysis. On this basis, the key parameters can be selected according to the order of magnitude of the influence degree. Furthermore, taking into account the production process and manufacturing costs, it is necessary to consider the active role of the non-key parameters in improving the submersible pump performance.

Keywords

Diffuser Parameter coupling Submersible pump Performance Path analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51179116), the Science and Technology Innovation Foundation of the Shanxi Agricultural University of China (Grant No. 2018YJ41) and the Shanxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 201601D102045). In addition, the authors appreciate the assistance received from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering of the University of Auckland.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang QH, Xu Y, Xu YH et al (2013) Study on key technologies of energy-saving and environment-protective pumps. Thermal Sci 17:1556–1559Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ghamarian A (1981) Energy conservation in power plants: analysis of pressure-equalizing pump performance. Energy 6(6):555–559Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hergt PH (1999) Pump research and development: past, present, and future. J Fluids Eng 121:248–253Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhao QX (2002) Geometry parameter selecting of diversion shell and the effect on pump function. J Taiyuan Univ Technol 33:414–416Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou L, Bai L, Shi WD et al (2018) Numerical analysis and performance experiment of electric submersible pump with different diffuser vanes number. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40:89Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang JS, Fan HG, Zhang W et al (2019) Energy performance and flow characteristics of a multiphase pump with different tip clearance sizes. Adv Mech Eng 11(1):1–14Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sheha AAA, Nasr M, Hosien MA et al (2018) Computational and experimental study on the water-jet pump performance. J Appl Fluid Mech 11(4):1013–1020Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xue F, Zhang YL, Chao CQ et al (2018) Study of the volute inlet width effect on structural strength of hot water circulating pump. In: Conference series: earth and environmental science, vol 163(1). IOP Publishing, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang J, Cheng HY, Xu SJ et al (2019) Performance of cavitation flow and its induced noise of different jet pump cavitation reactors. Ultrason Sonochem 1:1–11Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang F, Appiah D, Zhang J et al (2018) Transient flow characterization in energy conversion of a side channel pump under different blade suction angles. Energy 161:635–648Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bellary SAI, Adhav R, Siddique MH et al (2016) Application of computational fluid dynamics and surrogate-coupled evolutionary computing to enhance centrifugal-pump performance. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 10:172–182Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Visser FC, Dijkers RJH, Woerd JGH (2000) Numerical flow-field analysis and design optimization of a high-energy first-stage centrifugal pump impeller. Comput Visual Sci 3:103–108zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pierret S, Van Den Braembussche RA (1999) Turbomachinery blade design using a Navier–Stock solver and artificial neural network. J Turbomach 121:326–332Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barbarelli S, Amelio M, Florio G (2016) Predictive model estimating the performances of centrifugal pumps used as turbines. Energy 107:103–121Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou L, Shi WD, Wu SQ (2013) Performance optimization in a centrifugal pump impeller by orthogonal experiment and numerical simulation. Adv Mech Eng 1:31–41Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anagnostopoulos JS (2009) A fast numerical method for flow analysis and blade design in centrifugal pump impellers. Comput Fluids 38:284–289zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang MG, Li H, Gao B et al (2008) Numerical calculation of turbulent flow in a centrifugal pump and flow field analysis to vaned diffuser. Fluid Mach 36:16–19Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Plutecki W, Szulc P, Plutecki J (2018) The influence of the vane diffuser head losses curve on the external characteristic of high specific speed pumps. J Pet Sci Eng 162:394–406Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perissinotto RM, William MV, Mariana G et al (2019) Experimental and numerical study of oil drop motion within an ESP impeller. J Petrol Sci Eng 175:881–895Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhu JJ, Wang ZH, Zhu HW et al (2018) Mechanistic modeling of electrical submersible pump ESP boosting pressure under gassy flow conditions and experimental validation. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, DallasGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen Y, Patil A, Chen Y, Bai C, Wang Y, Morrison G (2018) Numerical study on the first stage head degradation in an electrical submersible pump with population balance model. ASME J Energy Resour Technol 141(2):022003–022011Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sinha M, Pinarbasi A, Katz J (2001) The flow structure during onset and developed states of rotating stall within a vane diffuser of a centrifugal pump. J Fluids Eng 123:490–499Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cong XQ, Wang GH, Yuan DQ et al (2010) Numerical calculation and optimal design of centrifugal pump with space guide vanes. J Drain Irrig Mach Eng 28:488–491Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhou L, Bai L, Yang Y et al (2016) Influence of diffuser vane number on submersible well pump performance. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 47(10):78–84Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cong XQ, Zhou R, Han YT et al (2015) Optimization design of deep-well centrifugal pump based on CFX orthogonal test. Fluid Mach 43(9):22–25Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhou L, Shi WD, Lu WG et al (2011) Orthogonal test and optimization design of submersible pump guide vanes. J Drain Irrig Mach Eng 29(4):312–315Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wei QS, Sun XH (2017) Performance influence in submersible pump with different diffuser inlet widths. Adv Mech Eng 9(1):1–8MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang FJ, Li YJ, Wang WE (2005) Analysis on CFD application in water pumps. Drain Irrig Mach 23:1–10Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stel H, Ofuchi EM, Sabino RG et al (2018) Investigation of the motion of bubbles in a centrifugal pump impeller. ASME J Fluids Eng 141(3):031203–031214Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Perissinotto R, Monte Verde W, Biazussi J, de Castro M, Carlos BA (2019) Experimental analysis on the velocity of oil drops in oil-water two-phase flows in electrical submersible pump impellers. ASME J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 141(4):041301–041309Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Morrison G, Yin W, Agarwal R, Patil A (2018) Development of modified affinity law for centrifugal pump to predict the effect of viscosity. ASME J Energy Resour Technol 140(9):092005–092009Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang XJ, Li DM (2006) The calculation and analysis of multistage diffuser in centrifugal pump using CFD. J Gansu Sci 18(3):47–50Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Feng JJ, Benra FK, Dohmen HJ (2007) Numerical investigation on pressure fluctuations for different configurations of vaned diffuser pumps. Int J Rotating Mach 2007:1–10Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kitano M (2004) Numerical study of unsteady flow in a centrifugal pump. J Turbomach 127(2):805–814Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gonzalez J, Fernandez J, Blanco E et al (2002) Numerical simulation of the dynamic effects due to impeller-volute interaction in a centrifugal pump. J Fluids Eng 124(2):348–355Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sano T, Yoshida Y, Tsujimoto Y et al (2002) Numerical study of rotating stall in a pump vane diffuser. J Fluids Eng 124(2):192–201Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhou L, Yang Y, Shi WD et al (2016) Influence of outlet edge position of diffuser vane on performance of deep-well centrifugal pump. J Drain Irrig Mach Eng 34(12):1028–1034Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bai YX, Kong FY, Xia B (2017) Effect of blade number matching of impeller and diffuser in high-speed rescue pump. Adv Mech Eng 9(5):1–12Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhu XY, Jiang W, Li GJ et al (2016) Numerical analysis of hydraulic performance in centrifugal pump with vane diffuser. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 47(6):34–41Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stel H, Sirino T, Ponce FJ et al (2015) Numerical investigation of the flow in a multistage electric submersible pump. J Pet Sci Eng 136:41–54Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ming DX (1990) Path analysis. Sichuan Agricultural University Press, Ya’anGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang XS (1979) Orthogonal test design. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yan C (2006) Computational fluid dynamics method and application. Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cui DQ (1994) Matrix algorithm for path analysis. J Biomech 9(1):71–76Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Urban and Rural ConstructionShanxi Agricultural UniversityTaiguChina
  2. 2.Office of the DeanJinzhong UniversityJinzhongChina
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations