Advertisement

Effect of fractal distribution of the porosity on mechanical properties of Al foams manufactured by infiltration

  • J. C. Carranza
  • L. Pérez
  • R. Ganesan
  • B. Y. Casas
  • R. A. L. Drew
  • C. Ruiz-Aguilar
  • I. A. Figueroa
  • I. AlfonsoEmail author
Technical Paper
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

Mechanical properties of metallic foams are highly dependent on the characteristics of porosity. In the case of foams manufactured using space holder particles (SHPs), parameters such as percentage porosity, pore size and cell wall thickness are directly contingent on the SHP used. In this work, different fractal distributions of SHPs were introduced in order to modify the resulting porosity. An Al–Si–Cu alloy was used as raw material for producing metallic foams by infiltration, while NaCl particles of 2 and 4 mm were used as SHPs, modifying the small-to-large particle ratio and fractal dimensions. Cylindrical foams of 10 cm in height and 5 cm in diameter were obtained by infiltrating the Al alloy into the SHPs. Results showed that the use of fractal distribution allowed to slightly increase the percentage porosity, whereas the most important effect was the decrease in cell wall thickness when fractal dimension increased. Mechanical properties were directly affected by these modifications, decreasing when fractality was induced. Finite element analysis models of the foams were obtained in a combination with discrete element method, in order to simulate their compressive elastic behaviors. Young’s modulus estimations were in excellent agreement with experimental results, validating the effect of fractal inclusion and the importance of the correct model selection.

Keywords

Foam FEA DEM Fractal Infiltration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I. Alfonso would like to acknowledge the financial support from SEP CONACYT 285215 and UNAM PAPIIT IN117316. R. Drew acknowledges the financial support from PREI DGAPA UNAM. L. Pérez acknowledges the financial support from the Advanced Center for Electrical and Electronic Engineering, AC3E, Basal Project FB0008, CONICYT. R. Ganesan acknowledges the financial support from the Chilean Agency CONICYT (FONDECYT Project 3150411).

References

  1. 1.
    Banhart J (2007) Metal foams-from fundamental research to applications. In: Baldev R, Ranganathan S, Rao KB, Matthew MD, Shankar P (eds) Frontiers in the design of materials. Universities Press Limited, Hyderabad, pp 279–289Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    García-Moreno F (2016) Commercial applications of metal foams: their properties and production. Materials 9:85.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9020085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Papadopoulos DP, Konstantinidis ICh, Papanastasiou N, Skolianos S, Lefakis H, Tsipas DN (2004) Mechanical properties of Al metal foams. Mater Lett 58(21):2574–2578.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2004.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Banhart J (2001) Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog Mater Sci 46:559.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jha N, Mondal DP, Dutta Majumdar J, Badkul A, Jha AK, Khare AK (2013) Highly porous open cell Ti-foam using NaCl as temporary space holder through powder metallurgy route. Mater Des 47:810–819.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pérez L, Lascano S, Aguilar C, Domancic D, Alfonso I (2015) Simplified fractal FEA model for the estimation of the Young’s modulus of Ti foams obtained by powder metallurgy. Mater Des 83:276–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Altinkök N (2019) Modeling of the mechanical and physical properties of hybrid composites produced by gas pressure infiltration. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41:13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1518-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mat Noor F, Zain MIM, Jamaludin KR, Hussin R, Kamdi Z, Ismail A, Ahmad S, Taib H (2014) Potassium bromide as space holder for titanium foam preparation. Appl Mech Mater 465–466:922–926.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.465-466.922 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aristoff D, Radin C (2009) Random loose packing in granular matter. J Stat Phys 135:1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-009-9722-4 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang CS, Wang JY, Ge L (2015) Modeling of minimum void ratio for sand-silt mixtures. Eng Geol 196:293–304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.07.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Groot R, Stoyanov S (2011) Close packing density and fracture strength of adsorbed polydisperse particle layers. Soft Matter 7:4750–4761.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C0SM00859A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mandelbrot BB, Passoja DE, Paullay AJ (1984) Fractal character of fracture surface of metals. Nature 308:721–722.  https://doi.org/10.1038/308721a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Muñoz S, Castillo SM, Torres Y (2018) Different models for simulation of mechanical behaviour of porous materials. J Mech Behav Biomed 80:88–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.01.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pérez L, Lascano S, Aguilar C, Estay D, Messner U, Figueroa IA, Alfonso I (2015) DEM–FEA estimation of pores arrangement effect on the compressive Young’s modulus for Mg foams. Comput Mater Sci 110:281–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.08.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chawla N, Sidhu RS, Ganesh VV (2006) Three-dimensional visualization and microstructure-based modeling of deformation in particle-reinforced composites. Acta Mater 5:1541–1548.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cundall PA, Strack OD (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29:47–65.  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kloss C, Goniva C, Hager A, Amberger S, Pirker S (2012) Models, algorithms and validation for opensource DEM and CFD-DEM. Prog Comput Fluid Dyn 12:140–152.  https://doi.org/10.1504/PCFD.2012.047457 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hasan A (2010) An improved model for FE modeling and simulation of closed cell Al-alloy foams. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2010:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/567390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Florek R, Simančík F, Nosko M, Harnúšková J (2010) Compression test evaluation method for aluminium foam parts of different alloys and densities. Powder Metall Prog 10:207–212Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhu HX, Knott JF, Mills NJ (1997) Analysis of the elastic properties of open-cell foams with tetrakaidecahedral cells. J Mech Phys Solids 45:319–343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(96)00090-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Warren WE, Kraynik AM (1988) The linear elastic properties of open-cell foams. J Appl Mech 55:341–346.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3173680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gan YX, Chen C, Shen YP (2005) Three-dimensional modeling of the mechanical property of linearly elastic open cell foams. Int J Solids Struct 42:6628–6642.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.002 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Investigaciones en Materiales, Unidad MoreliaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMoreliaMexico
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversidad Técnica Federico Santa MaríaValparaísoChile
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Aerospace EngineeringConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  4. 4.Instituto de Investigaciones en MaterialesUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations