Advertisement

Characterization of the material-induced elastic–plastic deformations in ultra-precision diamond cutting

  • Wang Sujuan
  • Sun Hao
  • Ma Haojie
  • Xin Feng
  • Yin ZiqiangEmail author
Technical Paper
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

Ultra-precision cutting (UPC) technology can directly achieve freeform surfaces with form accuracy in sub-micrometer and surface finishing in nanometer, and the achieved surface quality affects the functionalities of the components. Different from the conventional machining process, the effects of workpiece material properties on surface generation in UPC are ignorable. The influences of plastic side flow and elastic recovery are very important for the surface quality in UPC, while few studies were found to evaluate the extent of the two phenomena. This paper makes theoretical and experimental studies on the factors affecting the side flow and recovery and proposed a method to characterize the extent of plastic side flow and recovery by studying the deviation of the groove radius in single ruling. Experiments are conducted to machine grooves with different cutting parameters on different workpiece materials. The experiment results agree well with the theoretical analyses and show that under the combined effect of side flow and recovery, the generated groove radius may be larger or smaller than the theoretical one. Moreover, the proposed method makes effective evaluation on extend of swelling and recovery in UPC.

Keywords

Plastic side flow Elastic recovery Ultra-precision cutting (UPC) Micro-grooving Ruling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1601202, No. 51575520), Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. 2015A030312008) and Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (No. 201804020040).

References

  1. 1.
    Kwok TC, Cheung CF, Kong LB, To S, Lee WB (2010) Analysis of surface generation in ultra-precision machining with a fast tool servo. Proc IMechE Part B J Eng Manuf 224(9):1351–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen X, Kang M, Wang XS, Hassan M, Yang J (2016) Tool path optimal design for slow tool servo turning of complex optical surface. Proc IMechE Part B J Eng Manuf 231(5):825–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jiao FF, Cheng K (2013) An experimental investigation on micro-milling of polymethyl methacrylate components with nanometric surface roughness. Proc IMechE Part B J Eng Manuf 228(5):790–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruzzone AAG, Costa HL, Lonardo PM, Lucca DA (2008) Advances in engineered surfaces for functional performance. CIRP ANN-Manuf Technol 57:750–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang C, Tartaglino U, Persson BNJ (2006) Influence of surface roughness on superhydrophobicity. PRL Phys Rev Lett 97:116103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dorrer C, Rühe J (2009) Some thoughts on superhydrophobic wetting. Soft Matter 5:51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bennet HE, Porteus JO (1961) Relation between surface roughness and specular reflectance at normal Incidence. J Opt Soc Am 51:123–129MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Delrio FW, de Boer MP, Knapp JA, Reedy DE Jr, Clews PJ, Dunn ML (2005) The role of van der Waals forces in adhesion of micromachined surfaces. Nat Mater 4:629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pastewka L, Robbins MO (2014) Contact between rough surfaces and a criterion for macroscopic adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(9):3298–3303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Müser MH (2015) A dimensionless measure for adhesion and effects of the range of adhesion in contacts of nominally flat surfaces. Tribol Int 100:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rodríguez-Fernández J, Funston AM, Pérez-Juste J, Álvarez-Puebla RA, Liz-Marzán LM, Mulvaney P (2009) The effect of surface roughness on the plasmonic response of individual sub-micron gold spheres. Phys Chem Chem Phys 11:5909–5914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lonardo PM (1974) Measurement of smooth surface roughness by means of photometric methods. Ann CIRP 23(1):189–190Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Zwol PJ, Palasantzas G, De Hosson JTM (2007) Roughness corrections to the Casimir force: the importance of local surface slope. Appl Phys Lett 91(144108):1–3Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Proudhon H, Fouvry S, Buffiere J (2005) A fretting crack initiation prediction taking into account the surface roughness and the crack nucleation process volume. Int J Fatigue 27:569–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stodke C, Stephan P (2007) Spray Cooling on Micro-Structured Surfaces. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50:4089–4097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang SJ, To S, Wang SJ, Zhu ZW (2015) A review of surface roughness generation in ultra-precision machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 91:76–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pekelharing AJ, Gieszen CA (1971) Material side flow in finish turning. Ann CIRP 20:21–22Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sata T (1964) Surface finish in metal cutting. Ann CIRP XII:190–197Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sata T, Shaw MC (1964) Behavior of cellular materials undergoing plastic flow. Ann CIRP 12:190Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shaw MC (1984) Metal cutting principles. Oxford University Press Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sata T, Li M, Takata S, Hiraoka H, Li CQ, Xing XZ, Xiao XG (1985) Analysis of surface roughness generation in turning operation and its applications. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 34:473–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kishawy HA, Elbestawi MA (1997) Effect of process parameters on chip morphology when machining hardened steel. Proc IMECE ASME 6–2:13–20Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kishawy HA, Elbestawi MA (1999) Effects of process parameters on material side flow during hard turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39(7):1017–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Essam MF (1994) Cutting performance and tool failure characteristics during machining of difficult-to-cut materials using ceramic tools. Dissertation, McMaster UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bresseler B, El-Wardany TI, Elbestawi MA (1997) Material side flow in high speed finish boring of case hardened steel. In: 1st French and German conference on high speed machining, pp. 17–18Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Warnecke G, Bach P (1988) Mechanical and material influences on machined surface in precision turning of steel with ceramics. In: Proceedings of 16th North American research conference, pp. 209–216Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pednekar V, Madhavan V, Adibi-Sedeh AH (2004) Investigation of the transition from plane strain to plane stress in orthogonal metal cutting. In: ASME 2004 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, pp. 513–528Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cheung CF, Lee WB (2000) A multi-spectrum analysis of surface roughness formation in ultra-precision machining. Precis Eng 24:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    To S, Cheung CF, Lee WB (2001) Influence of material swelling upon surface roughness in diamond turning of single crystals. Mater Sci Technol 17(1):102–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cheung CF, Lee WB (2000) Study of factors affecting the surface quality in ultra- precision diamond turning. Mater Manuf Process 15(4):481–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kong MC, Lee WB, Cheung CF, To S (2006) A study of materials swelling and recovery in single-point diamond turning of ductile materials. J Mater Process Technol 180:210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kishawy HA, Haglund A, Balazinski M (2006) Modelling of material side flow in hard turning. Ann CIRP 55(1):4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu K, Melkote SN (2006) Effect of plastic side flow on surface roughness in micro-turning process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:1778–1785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ge YF, Xu JH, Yang H (2010) Diamond tools wear and their applicability when ultra-precision turning of SiCp/2009Al matrix composite. Wear 269:699–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang SJ, To S, Cheung CF (2012) Effect of workpiece material on surface roughness in ultraprecision raster milling. Mater Manuf Process 27(10):1022–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zong WJ, Huang YH, Zhang YL, Sun T (2014) Conservation law of surface roughness in single point diamond turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 84:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Grzesik W (1996) A revised model for predicting surface roughness in turning. Wear 194:143–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    He CL, Zong WJ, Cao ZM, Sun T (2015) Theoretical and empirical coupled modeling on the surface roughness in diamond turning. Mater Des 82:216–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    He C, Zong W, Sun T (2016) Origins for the size effect of surface roughness in diamond turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 106:22–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Maiss O, Grove T, Denkena B (2017) Influence of asymmetric cutting edge roundings on surface topography. Prod Eng Res Dev 11:383–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Liu X, Zhou TF, Pan SQ, Xie JQ, Wang XB (2018) Burr formation mechanism of ultraprecision cutting for microgrooves on nickel phosphide in consideration of the diamond tool edge radius. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(9–12):3929–3935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Xu F, Fang F, Zhang X (2018) Effects of recovery and side flow on surface generation in nano-cutting of single crystal silicon. Comput Mater Sci 143:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    DeVries WR (1979) Autoregressive time series models for surface profile characterization. Ann CIRP 28:437–440Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nowicki B (1981) Investigation of the surface roughness range. Ann CIRP 30:493–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    You SJ, Ehmann KF (1991) Computer synthesis of three-dimensional surfaces. Wear 145:29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hasegawa M, Liu J, Okuda K (1996) Calculation of the fractal dimension of machined surface profiles. Wear 192:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bigerelle M, GautierA IA (2007) Roughness characteristic length scales of micro-machined surfaces: a multi-scale modelling. Sens Actuators B 126:126–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sata T, Li M, Takata S, Hiraoka H, Li CQ, Xing XZ et al (1985) Analysis of surface roughness generation in turning operation and its applications. Ann CIRP 34:473–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Whitehouse DJ (1994) Handbook of Surface Metrology. Institute of Physics, BristolGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cheung CF, Lee WB (2001) Characterisation of nanosurface generation in single-point diamond turning. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 41(4):851–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Khan GS, Ramagopal SV, Chattopadhyay KD, Jain PK, Bajpai RP (2004) Characterization of nano-scale roughness in single point diamond Turned optical surfaces using power spectral density analysis. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 11(1):25–30Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Josso B, Burton DR, Lalor MJ (2002) Frequency normalised wavelet transform for surface roughness analysis and characterisation. Wear 252:491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Brol S, Grzesik W, Rech J (2007) The comparison of surface roughness profiles after hard turning and abrasive operations using the continuous wavelet transform technique. In: Proceedings of the fourth international congress on precision machining, Kielce, Poland, pp. 127–132Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Grzesik W, Brol S (2009) Wavelet and fractal approach to surface roughness characterization after finish turning of different workpiece materials. J Mater Process Technol 209:2522–2531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wang SJ, To S, Cheung CF (2013) An investigation into material-induced surface roughness in ultra-precision milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:607–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wang SJ, Chen X, To S, Chen XD, Liu Q, Liu JW (2017) Modelling and prediction of the effect of cutting strategy on surface generation in ultraprecision raster milling. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 30(9):895–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kobayashi R, Xu SL, Shimada K, Mizutani M, Kuriyagawa T (2017) Defining the effects of cutting parameters on burr formation and minimization in ultra-precision grooving of amorphous alloy. Precis Eng 49:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Precision Electronic Manufacturing Technology and EquipmentGuangdong University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Micro-Nano Manufacturing Technology and Equipment, School of Electromechanical EngineeringGuangdong University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.School of Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringPingxiang UniversityPingxiangChina

Personalised recommendations