Multi-criteria performance optimization and analysis of a gas–steam combined power system

  • Guven Gonca
  • Veysi BaşhanEmail author
Technical Paper


This paper reports a comprehensive investigation of performances for a gas–steam combined power system (GSCPS) by considering exergy and thermo-ecology criteria. The most known and important parameters such as power density, power output, exergy destruction, exergetic efficiency, ecological coefficient performance (ECOP) and effective ecological power density (EFECPOD) are investigated. The influences of turbine design parameters such as turbine speed, mass flow rate of the working fluid, pressure ratio, equivalence ratio, intake air temperatures and pressures, residual gas fraction, fluid temperatures in heat exchanger, the pressure of high-pressure steam turbine, the pressure of medium-pressure steam turbine, the pressure of low-pressure steam turbine, the pressure of open feedwater heater, the pressure of condenser on the performance specifications have been evaluated. The results indicated that the component properties have remarkable impacts on the performance parameters of the GSCPS.


Gas–steam combined power system Thermo-ecology ECOP Exergy EFECPOD 



  1. 1.
    Wang W, Chen L, Sun F, Wu C (2005) Power optimization of an endoreversible closed intercooled regenerated Brayton cycle. Int J Therm Sci 44:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sanjay Y, Singh O, Prasad BN (2007) Energy and exergy analysis of steam cooled reheat gas–steam combined cycle. Appl Therm Eng 27:2779–2790. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang W, Chen L, Sun F, Wu C (2005) Power optimization of an endoreversible closed intercooled regenerated Brayton-cycle coupled to variable-temperature heat-reservoirs. Appl Energy 82:181–195. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen L, Wang J, Sun F (2008) Power density analysis and optimization of an irreversible closed intercooled regenerated Brayton cycle. Math Comput Model 48:527–540. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu F, Chen L, Sun F (2010) Exergetic efficiency optimization for an irreversible quantum Brayton refrigerator with spin systems. Appl Math Model 34:617–625MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baghernejad A, Yaghoubi M (2011) Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle System (ISCCS) using genetic algorithm. Energy Convers Manag 52:2193–2203. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cavalcanti EJC (2017) Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated solar combined cycle system. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:507–519. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang Z, Chen L, Yang B et al (2015) Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of an air Brayton cycle for recovering waste heat of blast furnace slag. Appl Therm Eng 90:742–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen L, Ni D, Zhang Z, Sun F (2016) Exergetic performance optimization for new combined intercooled regenerative Brayton and inverse Brayton cycles. Appl Therm Eng 102:447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sharma M, Singh O (2016) Exergy analysis of dual pressure HRSG for different dead states and varying steam generation states in gas/steam combined cycle power plant. Appl Therm Eng 93:614–622. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gonca G, Sahin B (2017) Thermo-ecological performance analysis of a Joule-Brayton cycle (JBC) turbine with considerations of heat transfer losses and temperature-dependent specific heats. Energy Convers Manag 138:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cameretti MC, Tuccillo R (2015) Combustion features of a bio-fuelled micro-gas turbine. Appl Therm Eng 89:280–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baina F, Malmquist A, Alejo L et al (2015) Analysis of a high-temperature heat exchanger for an externally-fired micro gas turbine. Appl Therm Eng 75:410–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Naserian MM, Farahat S, Sarhaddi F (2016) Exergoeconomic multi objective optimization and sensitivity analysis of a regenerative Brayton cycle. Energy Convers Manag 117:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rostamzadeh H, Ebadollahi M, Ghaebi H et al (2017) Energy and exergy analysis of novel combined cooling and power (CCP) cycles. Appl Therm Eng 124:152–169. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ahmadi MH, Ahmadi M-A, Pourfayaz F, Bidi M (2016) Thermodynamic analysis and optimization for an irreversible heat pump working on reversed Brayton cycle. Energy Convers Manag 110:260–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Balku Ş (2017) Analysis of combined cycle efficiency by simulation and optimization. Energy Convers Manag 148:174–183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim M, Kim D, Esfahani IJ et al (2017) Performance assessment and system optimization of a combined cycle power plant (CCPP) based on exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses. Korean J Chem Eng 34:6–19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bracco S, Siri S (2010) Exergetic optimization of single level combined gas–steam power plants considering different objective functions. Energy 35:5365–5373. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang B, Chen L, Sun F (2016) Exergetic performance optimization of an endoreversible variable-temperature heat reservoirs intercooled regenerated Brayton cogeneration plant. J Energy Inst 89:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oko COC, Njoku IH (2017) Performance analysis of an integrated gas-, steam- and organic fluid-cycle thermal power plant. Energy 122:431–443. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ganjehkaviri A, Mohd Jaafar MN, Ahmadi P, Barzegaravval H (2014) Modelling and optimization of combined cycle power plant based on exergoeconomic and environmental analyses. Appl Therm Eng 67:566–578. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cihan A, Hacıhafızogˇlu O, Kahveci K (2006) Energy–exergy analysis and modernization suggestions for a combined-cycle power plant. Int J Energy Res 30:115–126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aminyavari M, Mamaghani AH, Shirazi A et al (2016) Exergetic, economic, and environmental evaluations and multi-objective optimization of an internal-reforming SOFC-gas turbine cycle coupled with a Rankine cycle. Appl Therm Eng 108:833–846. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haseli Y (2013) Optimization of a regenerative Brayton cycle by maximization of a newly defined second law efficiency. Energy Convers Manag 68:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sanjay (2011) Investigation of effect of variation of cycle parameters on thermodynamic performance of gas–steam combined cycle. Energy 36:157–167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shu L, Chen L, Jin J et al (2005) Functional reliability simulation for a power-station’s steam-turbine. Appl Energy 80:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ahmadi GR, Toghraie D (2016) Energy and exergy analysis of Montazeri steam power plant in Iran. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 56:454–463. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ust Y, Gonca G, Kayadelen H (2011) Determination of optimum reheat pressures for single and double reheat irreversible Rankine cycle. J Energy Inst 84:215–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Abuelnuor AAA, Saqr KM, Mohieldein SAA et al (2017) Exergy analysis of Garri “2” 180 MW combined cycle power plant. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 79:960–969. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Al-Sulaiman FA, Dincer I, Hamdullahpur F (2012) Energy and exergy analyses of a biomass trigeneration system using an organic Rankine cycle. Energy 45:975–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Caliskan H, Dincer I, Hepbasli A (2012) Energy and exergy analyses of combined thermochemical and sensible thermal energy storage systems for building heating applications. Energy Build 48:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2012) Exergo-environmental analysis of an integrated organic Rankine cycle for trigeneration. Energy Convers Manag 64:447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hogerwaard J, Dincer I, Zamfirescu C (2013) Analysis and assessment of a new organic Rankine based heat engine system with/without cogeneration. Energy 62:300–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ozcan H, Dincer I (2014) Thermodynamic analysis of a combined chemical looping-based trigeneration system. Energy Convers Manag 85:477–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ganjehsarabi H, Gungor A, Dincer I (2014) Exergoeconomic evaluation of a geothermal power plant. Int J Exergy 14:303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gonca G (2015) Energy and exergy analyses of single and double reheat irreversible Rankine cycle. Int J Exergy 18:402–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Memon AG, Memon RA, Qureshi S (2017) Thermo-environmental and economic analyses of combined cycle power plants with regression modelling and optimization. Appl Therm Eng 125:489–512. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Meratizaman M, Monadizadeh S, Sardasht MT, Amidpour M (2015) Techno economic and environmental assessment of using gasification process in order to mitigate the emission in the available steam power cycle. Energy 83:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    García RF, Carril JC, Gomez JR, Gomez MR (2015) Power plant based on three series Rankine cycles combined with a direct expander using LNG cold as heat sink. Energy Convers Manag 101:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Elsafi AM (2015) Exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of sustainable direct steam generation solar power plants. Energy Convers Manag 103:338–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Khaljani M, Khoshbakhti Saray R, Bahlouli K (2015) Comprehensive analysis of energy, exergy and exergo-economic of cogeneration of heat and power in a combined gas turbine and organic Rankine cycle. Energy Convers Manag 97:154–165. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vandani AMK, Bidi M, Ahmadi F (2015) Exergy analysis and evolutionary optimization of boiler blowdown heat recovery in steam power plants. Energy Convers Manag 106:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hafdhi F, Khir T, Yahyia AB, Brahim AB (2015) Energetic and exergetic analysis of a steam turbine power plant in an existing phosphoric acid factory. Energy Convers Manag 106:1230–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yang M-H (2015) Thermal and economic analyses of a compact waste heat recovering system for the marine diesel engine using transcritical Rankine cycle. Energy Convers Manag 106:1082–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rashidi M, Galanis N, Nazari F et al (2011) Parametric analysis and optimization of regenerative Clausius and organic Rankine cycles with two feedwater heaters using artificial bees colony and artificial neural network. Energy 36:5728–5740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jang HJ, Kang SY, Lee JJ et al (2015) Performance analysis of a multi-stage ultra-supercritical steam turbine using computational fluid dynamics. Appl Therm Eng 87:352–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Duan L, Zhu J, Yue L, Yang Y (2014) Study on a gas–steam combined cycle system with CO2 capture by integrating molten carbonate fuel cell. Energy 74:417–427. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chmielniak T, Czaja D, Lepszy S, Stępczyńska-Drygas K (2015) Thermodynamic and economic comparative analysis of air and steam bottoming cycle. Energy 92:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nadir M, Ghenaiet A (2015) Thermodynamic optimization of several (heat recovery steam generator) HRSG configurations for a range of exhaust gas temperatures. Energy 86:685–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Selwynraj AI, Iniyan S, Polonsky G et al (2015) Exergy analysis and annual exergetic performance evaluation of solar hybrid STIG (steam injected gas turbine) cycle for Indian conditions. Energy 80:414–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Selwynraj AI, Iniyan S, Polonsky G et al (2015) An economic analysis of solar hybrid steam injected gas turbine (STIG) plant for Indian conditions. Appl Therm Eng 75:1055–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Fortunato B, Camporeale SM, Torresi M (2013) A gas–steam combined cycle powered by syngas derived from biomass. Proc Comput Sci 19:736–745. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Olivenza-León D, Medina A, Hernández AC (2015) Thermodynamic modeling of a hybrid solar gas-turbine power plant. Energy Convers Manag 93:435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Morini M, Pinelli M, Spina PR et al (2015) Feasibility analysis of gas turbine inlet air cooling by means of liquid nitrogen evaporation for IGCC power augmentation. Appl Therm Eng 80:168–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Salvini C (2016) Techno-economic analysis of CAES systems integrated into gas–steam combined plants. Energy Proc 101:870–877. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Salvini C (2017) Performance assessment of a CAES system integrated into a gas–steam combined plant. Energy Proc 136:264–269. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Carcasci C, Cosi L, Ferraro R, Pacifici B (2017) Effect of a real steam turbine on thermoeconomic analysis of combined cycle power plants. Energy 138:32–47. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jarre M, Noussan M, Poggio A (2016) Operational analysis of natural gas combined cycle CHP plants: energy performance and pollutant emissions. Appl Therm Eng 100:304–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Stanek W, Gazda W, Kostowski W (2015) Thermo-ecological assessment of CCHP (combined cold-heat-and-power) plant supported with renewable energy. Energy 92:279–289. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zhang G, Zheng J, Yang Y, Liu W (2016) Thermodynamic performance simulation and concise formulas for triple-pressure reheat HRSG of gas–steam combined cycle under off-design condition. Energy Convers Manag 122:372–385. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Athari H, Soltani S, Rosen MA et al (2016) Exergoeconomic study of gas turbine steam injection and combined power cycles using fog inlet cooling and biomass fuel. Renew Energy 96:715–726. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Chacartegui R, Sánchez D, Muñoz de Escalona JM et al (2013) Gas and steam combined cycles for low calorific syngas fuels utilisation. Appl Energy 101:81–92. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Araghi AH, Khiadani M, Hooman K (2016) A novel vacuum discharge thermal energy combined desalination and power generation system utilizing R290/R600a. Energy 98:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Yao E, Wang H, Wang L et al (2016) Thermo-economic optimization of a combined cooling, heating and power system based on small-scale compressed air energy storage. Energy Convers Manag 118:377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rajović V, Kiss F, Maravić N, Bera O (2016) Environmental flows and life cycle assessment of associated petroleum gas utilization via combined heat and power plants and heat boilers at oil fields. Energy Convers Manag 118:96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tan Z, Zhang H, Shi Q et al (2014) Multi-objective operation optimization and evaluation of large-scale NG distributed energy system driven by gas–steam combined cycle in China. Energy Build 76:572–587. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sahin AZ, Al-Sharafi A, Yilbas BS, Khaliq A (2016) Overall performance assessment of a combined cycle power plant: an exergo-economic analysis. Energy Convers Manag 116:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Dambrosio L, Fortunato B, Torresi M et al (2017) Performance optimization of a gas–steam combined power plant partially fed with syngas derived from pomace. Energy Proc 126:533–540. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Manente G (2016) High performance integrated solar combined cycles with minimum modifications to the combined cycle power plant design. Energy Convers Manag 111:186–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Vandani AMK, Joda F, Boozarjomehry RB (2016) Exergic, economic and environmental impacts of natural gas and diesel in operation of combined cycle power plants. Energy Convers Manag 109:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Benato A, Bracco S, Stoppato A, Mirandola A (2016) Dynamic simulation of combined cycle power plant cycling in the electricity market. Energy Convers Manag 107:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Gonca G (2017) Exergetic and thermo-ecological performance analysis of a Gas-Mercury combined turbine system (GMCTS). Energy Convers Manag 151:32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Klein S (2015) Engineering equation solver (EES), Academic Professional Version, F-chart SoftwareGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ferguson CR, Kirkpatrick AT (2015) Internal combustion engines: applied thermosciences. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ebrahimi R (2011) Thermodynamic modeling of performance of a Miller cycle with engine speed and variable specific heat ratio of working fluid. Comput Math Appl 62:2169–2176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ebrahimi R (2012) Performance analysis of an irreversible Miller cycle with considerations of relative air–fuel ratio and stroke length. Appl Math Model 36:4073–4079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Mousapour A, Hajipour A, Rashidi MM, Freidoonimehr N (2016) Performance evaluation of an irreversible Miller cycle comparing FTT (finite-time thermodynamics) analysis and ANN (artificial neural network) prediction. Energy 94:100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Al-Sarkhi A, Akash B, Jaber J et al (2002) Efficiency of Miller engine at maximum power density. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 29:1159–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Al-Sarkhi A, Al-Hinti I, Abu-Nada E, Akash B (2007) Performance evaluation of irreversible Miller engine under various specific heat models. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 34:897–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Gonca G, Sahin B (2016) The influences of the engine design and operating parameters on the performance of a turbocharged and steam injected diesel engine running with the Miller cycle. Appl Math Model 40:3764–3782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Gonca G, Dobrucali E (2016) Theoretical and experimental study on the performance of a diesel engine fueled with diesel–biodiesel blends. Renew Energy 93:658–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Gonca G, Dobrucali E (2016) The effects of engine design and operating parameters on the performance of a diesel engine fueled with diesel–biodiesel blends. J Renew Sustain Energy 8:025702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Gonca G (2017) Effects of engine design and operating parameters on the performance of a spark ignition (SI) engine with steam injection method (SIM). Appl Math Model 44:655–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Gonca G, Sahin B (2017) Effect of turbo charging and steam injection methods on the performance of a Miller cycle diesel engine (MCDE). Appl Therm Eng 118:138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Abu-Nada E, Al-Hinti I, Al-Sarkhi A, Akash B (2006) Thermodynamic modeling of spark-ignition engine: effect of temperature dependent specific heats. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 33:1264–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Abu-Nada E, Al-Hinti I, Akash B, Al-Sarkhi A (2007) Thermodynamic analysis of spark-ignition engine using a gas mixture model for the working fluid. Int J Energy Res 31:1031–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Abu-Nada E, Al-Hinti I, Al-Sarkhi A, Akash B (2008) Effect of piston friction on the performance of SI engine: a new thermodynamic approach. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 130:022802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Abu-Nada E, Akash B, Al-Hinti I, Al-Sarkhi A (2009) Performance of a spark ignition engine under the effect of friction using a gas mixture model. J Energy Inst 82:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Ge Y, Chen L, Sun F (2008) Finite-time thermodynamic modelling and analysis of an irreversible Otto-cycle. Appl Energy 85:618–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Ge Y, Chen L, Sun F (2008) Finite-time thermodynamic modelling and analysis of an irreversible diesel cycle. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng 222:887–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Ge Y, Chen L, Sun F (2010) Finite time thermodynamic modeling and analysis for an irreversible Atkinson cycle. Therm Sci 14:887–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Ge Y, Chen L, Sun F (2009) Finite-time thermodynamic modeling and analysis for an irreversible Dual cycle. Math Comput Model 50:101–108MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Chen L, Ge Y, Sun F, Wu C (2011) Finite-time thermodynamic modelling and analysis for an irreversible Miller cycle. Int J Ambient Energy 32:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Gonca G (2017) Exergetic and ecological performance analyses of a gas turbine system with two intercoolers and two re-heaters. Energy 124:579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Gonca G (2018) The effects of turbine design parameters on the thermo-ecologic performance of a regenerated gas turbine running with different fuel kinds. Appl Therm Eng 137:419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Gonca G, Genc I (2019) Thermoecology-based performance simulation of a gas-mercury–steam power generation system (GMSPGS). Energy Convers Manag 189:91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Gonca G, Sahin B (2019) Performance evaluation of a mercury-steam combined-energy-generation system (MES). Int J Energy Res 43:2281–2295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Gonca G (2018) Thermo-ecological performance analysis of a double-reheat Rankine cycle steam turbine system (RCSTS) with open and close feed water heaters. Int J Exergy 25:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Gonca G, Genc I (2019) Performance simulation of a double-reheat Rankine cycle mercury turbine system based on exergy. Int J Exergy (in press) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering DepartmentYildiz Technical UniversityBesiktasTurkey

Personalised recommendations