Advertisement

A DoE–TOPSIS meta-model for parametric optimization of silicon carbonitride (SiCN) thin film deposition process

  • Dhruva Kumar
  • Partha Protim Das
  • Shankar Chakraborty
  • Ashis Sharma
  • Bibhu P. SwainEmail author
Technical Paper
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

Silicon carbonitride (SiCN) thin films were deposited on p-type Si(100) substrate by thermal chemical vapour deposition process using SiC and Si3N4 nanopowder as the source, and mixture of N2 and H2 as precursor gases. For the experimental design, Taguchi’s L25 orthogonal array was used considering H2 flow rate, N2 flow rate and deposition temperature as the input deposition parameters, while taking into account, ID/IG ratio, hardness and Young’s modulus as the responses. Design of experiments integrated with technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method was applied to develop a corresponding meta-model so as to obtain the optimal parametric combination of the deposition process with respect to the computed TOPSIS score. It was found that optimal parametric combination of H2 flow rate as 60 sccm, N2 flow rate as 100 sccm and deposition temperature as 1300 °C results in improved values of ID/IG ratio, hardness and Young’s modulus. The microstructure, chemical bonding and mechanical properties of SiCN thin films were characterized using Atomic force microscopy, Raman spectroscopy and nano-indentation techniques. As the developed meta-model is solely based on the analysis of the data obtained from experimentation, it is more practical and immune of introducing any additional parameter in the analysis. Moreover, the developed surface plots will further help the process engineer in selecting the most suitable combination of deposition parameters for achieving desirable responses.

Keywords

Thermal CVD SiCN Raman Design of experiments TOPSIS Meta-model 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang J, Xu C, Liu Z, Wang W, Xin X, Shen L, Zhou X, Zhou J, Huang Q (2015) Enhanced rate capability of polymer-derived SiCN anode material for electrochemical storage of lithium with 3-d carbon nanotube network dispersed in nanoscale. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 15:3067–3075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yan X, Tay B, Chen G, Yang S (2006) Synthesis of silicon carbide nitride nanocomposite films by a simple electrochemical method. Electrochem Commun 8:737–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Izumi A, Oda K (2006) Deposition of SiCN films using organic liquid materials by HWCVD method. Thin Solid Films 501:195–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klaffke D, Wasche R, Janakiraman N, Aldinger F (2006) Tribological characterisation of siliconcarbonitride ceramics derived from preceramic polymers. Wear 260:711–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Awad Y, Khakani MA, Aktik C, Mouine J, Camire N, Lessard M, Scarlete M, Al-Abadleh HA, Smirani R (2009) Structural and mechanical properties of amorphous silicon carbonitride films prepared by vapor-transport chemical vapor deposition. Surf Coat Technol 204:539–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hamm SC, Waidmann J, Mathai JC, Gangopadhyay K, Currano L, Gangopadhyay S (2014) Characterization and versatile applications of low hydrogen content SiOCN grown by plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition. J Appl Phys 116:104902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nakazawa H, Okuno S, Miura S, Kamata R (2012) Hydrogen effects on the properties of silicon/nitrogen-co incorporated diamond-like carbon films prepared by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Jpn J Appl Phys 51:075801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sundaram KB, Alizadeh Z, Todi RM, Desai VH (2004) Investigations on hardness of rf sputter deposited SiCN thin films. Mater Sci Eng, A 368:103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Demin VN, Smirnova TP, Borisov VO, Grachev GN, Smirnov AL, Khomyakov MN (2015) Physical-chemical properties of silicon carbonitride films prepared using laser-plasma deposition from hexamethyldisilazane. Glass Phys Chem 41:232–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhattacharyya AS, Mishra SK, Mukherjee S (2010) Correlation of structure and hardness of rf magnetron sputtered silicon carbonitride films. J Vac Sci Technol, A 28:505–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ganeshan K, Ghosh S, Krishna NG, Ilango S, Kamruddin M, Tyagi AK (2016) A comparative study on defect estimation using XPS and Raman spectroscopy in few layer nanographitic structures. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:22160–22167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Swain BP, Swain BS, Hwang NM (2014) A comparative chemical network study of HWCVD deposited amorphous silicon and carbon based alloys thin films. J Alloys Compd 588:343–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghadai RK, Kalita K, Mondal SC, Swain BP (2018) PECVD process parameter optimization: towards increased hardness of diamond-like carbon thin films. Mater Manuf Proc 33:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zou YS, Wu YF, Yang H, Cang K, Song GH, Li ZX, Zhou K (2011) The microstructure, mechanical and friction properties of protective diamond like carbon films on magnesium alloy. Appl Surf Sci 258(4):1624–1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Singh TP, Jatti VS (2015) Optimization of the deposition parameters of DLC coatings with the IC-PECVD method. Part Sci Technol 33(2):119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tuinstra F, Koenig JL (1970) Raman spectrum of graphite. J Chem Phys 53(3):1126–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pimenta MA, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus MS, Cancado LG, Jorio A, Saito R (2007) Studying disorder in graphite-based systems by Raman spectroscopy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 9(11):1276–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klausmann A, Morita K, Johanns KE, Fasel C, Durst K, Mera G, Riedel R, Ionescu E (2015) Synthesis and high-temperature evolution of polysilylcarbodiimide-derived SiCN ceramic coatings. J Eur Ceram Soc 35(14):3771–3780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fischer-Cripps AC (2006) Critical review of analysis and interpretation of nanoindentation test data. Surf Coat Technol 200:4153–4165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Joshi D, Kumar S (2016) Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 248:183–191MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tiwary AP, Pradhan BB, Bhattacharyya B (2014) Application of multi-criteria decision making methods for selection of micro-EDM process parameters. Adv Manuf 2(3):251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Montgomery DC (2017) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    İç YT (2012) An experimental design approach using TOPSIS method for the selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 28(2):245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang P, Meng P, Zhai JY, Zhu ZQ (2013) A hybrid method using experiment design and grey relational analysis for multiple criteria decision making problems. Knowl-Based Syst 53:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chatterjee P, Chakraborty S (2017) Development of a meta-model for the determination of technological value of cotton fiber using design of experiments and the TOPSIS method. J Nat Fibers 15:1–14Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang P, Zhu Z, Wang Y (2016) A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design. Inf Sci 345:27–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Johnson RA, Miller I, Freund JE (2000) Probability and statistics for engineers. Pearson Education, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dhruva Kumar
    • 1
  • Partha Protim Das
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shankar Chakraborty
    • 2
  • Ashis Sharma
    • 1
  • Bibhu P. Swain
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSikkim Manipal Institute of Technology, Sikkim Manipal UniversitySikkimIndia
  2. 2.Department of Production EngineeringJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsNational Institute of Technology ManipurImphalIndia

Personalised recommendations