Advertisement

Numerical analysis of the effect of sweep-back angle on the stability derivatives of the grid fin

  • Parisa Dehghani
  • Miralam MahdiEmail author
Technical Paper
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Because of high hinge moment of planar fin in supersonic flow, designers have become more attentive to the grid fin configuration in recent years. One of the disadvantages of the grid fin is its high drag force. Fortunately, this problem could be handled by implementing sweep-back angle. Few studies have been carried out to investigate the effects of the sweep-back angle on dynamic coefficients. In this paper, computational fluid dynamics is used to investigate the effect of grid fin’s sweep-back angle on the rolling and pitching dynamic coefficients in supersonic flow regime. The first step is dedicated to simulating two experimental geometries and detecting optimal mesh number and appropriate turbulence model. Unsteady dynamic coefficients along with moving mesh have been extracted by simulations. These coefficients are reported for different Mach numbers. In order to scrutinize the results, the static stability derivatives have been discussed, too. According to the simulations, each sweep-back angle has a unique trend of changing dynamic and static coefficients in terms of the Mach number. This trend is justified by studying Mach number contours for few states. Afterward, dynamic coefficients of the planar fin are presented and compared with the grid fin.

Keywords

Grid fin Sweep-back angle Supersonic flow Static coefficient Roll and pitch damping coefficient 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Washington WD, Miller MS (1993) Grid fins—a new concept for missile stability and control. AIAA 93-0035, January 1993Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Washington WD, Miller MS (1998) Experimental investigations on grid fin aerodynamics: a synopsis of nine wind tunnel and three flight: tests. RTO-MP-5 AC/323(AVT)TP/3, November 1998Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simpson GM, Sadler AJ (1998) Lattice controls, a comparison with conventional, planar fins. RTO-MP-5 AC/323(AVT)TP/3, November 1998Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abate GL, Duckerschein RP, Hathaway W (2000) Subsonic/transonic free-flight tests of a generic missile with grid fins. AIAAPaper 2000–0937, January 2000Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeSpirito J, Sahu J (2001) Viscous CFD Calculations of grid fin missile aerodynamics in the supersonic flow regime. In 39th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Paper No. 2001-0257, Reno, NV, January 2001Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Despirito J, Vaughn M, Washington WD (2002) CFD investigation of canard controlled missile with planar and grid fins in supersonic flow. AIAA Paper 2002-4509, August 2002Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zeng Y, Cai J, Debiasi M, Chng TL (2009) Numerical study on drag reduction for grid-fin configurations National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119260, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Munawar S (2010) Analysis of grid fins as efficient control surface in comparison to conventional planar fins. In 27th international congress of the aeronautical sciencesGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bak KM (2010) Experimental investigation and computational fluid dynamics analysis of missile with grid fin in subsonic flow. Professor, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Tagore Engineering College, Chennai-600048Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kless JE, Aftosmis MJ†(2011) Analysis of grid fins for launch abort vehicle using a Cartesian Euler solver. Aerospace Engineer, Science and Technology Corporation, Hampton, VA., AIAA Member †Aerospace Engineer, NASA Ames Research Center, CA, AIAA Associate FellowGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sridhar K, Vijayalakshmi T, Balaguru I, Senthilkumar S (2012). CFD Analysis of missile with grid fin. Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Karpagam Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prashanth HS, Ravi KS, Krishnappa GB (2014) Aerodynamic characteristics of G16 grid fin configuration at subsonic and supersonic speeds. Int J Eng Res Gen Sci 2(5):129–135Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang C, Liu W, Yang G (2017) Numerical studies of static aeroelastic effects on grid fin Aerodynamic performances. Chin J Aeronaut 30:1300–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hiroshima F, Tatsumi K (2004) Grid pattern effects on aerodynamic characteristics of grid fins. In: International congress of the aeronautical sciences, ICAS 2004 CD-ROM proceedings, Yokohama, Japan, 29 August–3 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu Y, Xia Z, Lin J (2018) Numerical simulation of aerodynamic characteristics and heating for grid fin missiles. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 233:2368–2377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fangjian W, Lan C (2014) APISAT2014. 2014 Asia-Pacific international symposium on aerospace technology, numerical prediction of stability derivatives for complex configurations. China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamic, Beijing, 100074, ChinaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringShahid Rajaee Teacher Training UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations