Advertisement

Three-dimensional numerical simulation of droplet formation in a microfluidic flow-focusing device

  • Wenbo Han
  • Xueye ChenEmail author
  • Zhongli Wu
  • Yue Zheng
Technical Paper
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

Three-dimensional numerical simulation is performed to study the formation mechanism and influencing factors of droplets in a microfluidic flow-focusing device (MFFD). Three types of liquid–liquid two-phase flow patterns include squeezing, dripping and jetting. Through the level-set method, the two-phase interface is tracked and the process of droplet generation is obtained. The key factors influencing droplet formation size and frequency are studied in MFFD. The results show that the formation of droplets is divided into three stages: Filling stage, Necking stage and Detachment stage, respectively. The formation of droplets is mainly that the continuous phase has flow-focusing effect on the dispersed phase. The flow rate ratio of two phases, the viscosity of the continuous phase and interfacial tension between two phases are the key factors that influence droplet size and frequency. As the flow rate ratio increases, the droplet size becomes larger and the frequency decreases. As the viscosity of the continuous phase increases, the size of the droplets becomes smaller and the frequency increases. When the two-phase interfacial tension becomes larger, the size of the droplets becomes larger and the frequency decreases.

Keywords

Microfluidics 3D numerical simulation Droplet Flow focusing Level-set method 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by The Key Project of Department of Education of Liaoning Province (JZL201715401), Liaoning Province BaiQianWan Talent Project. We sincerely thank Prof. Chong Liu for his kind guidance.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors designed and performed the numerical simulations. The manuscript was written through contributions from all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript and declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhu Y, Fang Q (2013) Analytical detection techniques for droplet microfluidics—a review. Anal Chim Acta 787:24–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khojasteh D, Kazerooni M, Salarian S et al (2016) Droplet impact on superhydrophobic surfaces: a review of recent developments. J Ind Eng Chem 42:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gach PC, Iwai K, Kim PW et al (2017) Droplet microfluidics for synthetic biology. Lab Chip 17(20):3388–3400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gol B, Tovar-Lopez FJ, Kurdzinski ME et al (2015) Continuous transfer of liquid metal droplets across a fluid–fluid interface within an integrated microfluidic chip. Lab Chip 15(11):2476–2485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen X, Liu C, Xu Z et al (2013) An effective PDMS microfluidic chip for chemiluminescence detection of cobalt(II) in water. Microsyst Technol 19(1):99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen X, Li T, Zeng H et al (2016) Numerical and experimental investigation on micromixers with serpentine microchannels. Int J Heat Mass Transf 98:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen X, Shen J, Zhou M (2016) Rapid fabrication of a four-layer PMMA-based microfluidic chip using CO2-laser micromachining and thermal bonding. J Micromech Microeng 26(10):107001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen X, Li T (2016) A novel design for passive misscromixers based on topology optimization method. Biomed Microdevice 18(4):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen X, Li T (2017) A novel passive micromixer designed by applying an optimization algorithm to the zigzag microchannel. Chem Eng J 313:1406–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen X, Zhang L (2018) Review in manufacturing methods of nanochannels of bio-nanofluidic chips. Sens Actuators B Chem 254:648–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen X, Zhao Z (2017) Numerical investigation on layout optimization of obstacles in a three-dimensional passive micromixer. Anal Chim Acta 964:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen X, Li T, Shen J et al (2017) From structures, packaging to application: a system-level review for micro direct methanol fuel cell. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 80:669–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schneider T, Kreutz J, Chiu DT (2013) The potential impact of droplet microfluidics in biology. Anal Chem 85(7):3476–3482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pan LJ, Tu JW, Ma HT et al (2018) Controllable synthesis of nanocrystals in droplet reactors. Lab Chip 18(1):41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindner JR (2004) Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discovery 3(6):527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vidal-Folch N, Milosevic D, Majumdar R et al (2017) A droplet digital PCR method for severe combined immunodeficiency newborn screening. J Mol Diagn 19(5):755–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Köster S, Angile FE, Duan H et al (2008) Drop-based microfluidic devices for encapsulation of single cells. Lab Chip 8(7):1110–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu P, Wang L (2017) Passive and active droplet generation with microfluidics: a review. Lab Chip 17(1):34–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang CG, Xu ZR, Wang JH (2010) Manipulation of droplets in microfluidic systems. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 29(2):141–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Varma VB, Wu RG, Wang ZP et al (2017) Magnetic Janus particles synthesized using droplet micro-magnetofluidic techniques for protein detection. Lab Chip 17(20):3514–3525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Loo S, Stoukatch S, Kraft M et al (2016) Droplet formation by squeezing in a microfluidic cross-junction. Microfluid Nanofluid 20(10):146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yan Y, Guo D, Wen SZ (2012) Numerical simulation of junction point pressure during droplet formation in a microfluidic T-junction. Chem Eng Sci 84:591–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hong Y, Wang F (2007) Flow rate effect on droplet control in a co-flowing microfluidic device. Microfluid Nanofluid 3(3):341–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sesen M, Alan T, Neild A (2017) Droplet control technologies for microfluidic high throughput screening (μHTS). Lab Chip 17(14):2372–2394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Anna SL, Bontoux N, Stone HA (2003) Formation of dispersions using “flow focusing” in microchannels. Appl Phys Lett 82(3):364–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dreyfus R, Tabeling P, Willaime H (2003) Ordered and disordered patterns in two-phase flows in microchannels. Phys Rev Lett 90(14):144505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu J, Tan SH, Yap YF et al (2011) Numerical and experimental investigations of the formation process of ferrofluid droplets. Microfluid Nanofluid 11(2):177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Huang H, He X (2015) Fluid displacement during droplet formation at microfluidic flow-focusing junctions. Lab Chip 15(21):4197–4205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gulati S, Vijayakumar K, Good WW et al (2016) Microdroplet formation in rounded flow-focusing junctions. Microfluid Nanofluid 20(1):2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen X, Ren CL (2017) Experimental study on droplet generation in flow focusing devices considering a stratified flow with viscosity contrast. Chem Eng Sci 163:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang X, Zhu C, Fu T et al (2017) Critical condition for bubble breakup in a microfluidic flow-focusing junction. Chem Eng Sci 164:178–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Montessori A, Lauricella M, Succi S et al (2018) Elucidating the mechanism of step emulsification. Phys Rev Fluids 3(7):072202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Montessori A, Lauricella M, Stolovicki E et al (2019) Jetting to dripping transition: critical aspect ratio in step emulsifiers. Phys Fluids 31(2):021703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stolovicki E, Ziblat R, Weitz DA (2018) Throughput enhancement of parallel step emulsifier devices by shear-free and efficient nozzle clearance. Lab Chip 18(1):132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Montessori A, Lauricella M, La Rocca M et al (2018) Regularized lattice Boltzmann multicomponent models for low capillary and Reynolds microfluidics flows. Comput Fluids 167:33–39MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Montessori A, Prestininzi P, La Rocca M et al (2015) Lattice Boltzmann approach for complex nonequilibrium flows. Phys Rev E 92(4):043308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Olsson E, Kreiss G (2005) A conservative level set method for two phase flow. J Comput Phys 210(1):225–246MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Olsson E, Kreiss G, Zahedi S (2007) A conservative level set method for two phase flow II. J Comput Phys 225(1):785–807MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and AutomationLiaoning University of TechnologyJinzhouChina

Personalised recommendations