Advertisement

Influence of edge preparation of coated carbide tool on milling aluminum alloy 211Z

  • Xuefeng ZhaoEmail author
  • Yuchao Du
  • Lin He
  • Meng Tao
Technical Paper
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Edge preparation can improve tool life, cutting process stability, and quality of the machined surface. The coated tool must be edge-prepared after grinding to ensure enough bonding area to improve tool life. The influence of edge preparation on milling of aluminum alloy 211Z using the coated carbide tool is investigated via DEFORM simulations and corresponding cutting experiments. In this paper, the influence of edge radius, type of coating (TiN, TiCN, TiAlN, TiSiN, TiCrN), cutting speed, feed, axial depth, and radial depth on cutting force, surface roughness, and temperature is revealed. The results provide a basis for determining the effects of edge preparation. Moreover, theoretical values are used to reveal basic laws governing the cutting process, which may have practical significance.

Keywords

Edge preparation Tool coating Aluminum 211Z Cutting performance DEFORM 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation Project (No. 51665007) and the Research Fund of High level Innovative Talents Project in Guizhou Province (Grant No. [2016]4033).

References

  1. 1.
    Bogdan BM, Sabin PM (2013) Unconventional technologies in preparation of microgeometry edges on cutting tools. Rom Assoc Nonconv Technol 12:10–16Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barletta M, Gisari A, Venettacci S (2014) A comparative evaluation of fluidized bed assisted drag finishing and centrifugal disk dry finishing. Eng Sci Technol Int J 17(2):63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bouzakis KD, Michailidis N, Skordaris G et al (2003) Optimization of the cutting edge roundness and its manufacturing procedures of cemented carbide inserts, to improve their milling performance after a PVD coating deposition. Surf Coat Technol 163(2):625–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paolo CP (2013) Procedures of cemented carbide inserts to improve their milling performance after a PVD coating deposition. Surf Coat Technol 4:74–79Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karpuschewski B, Schmidt K et al (2014) Measuring procedures of cutting edge preparation when hard turning with coated ceramics tool inserts. Measurement 55(9):627–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bouzakis E, Bouzakis KD, Kombogiannis S (2014) Effect of cutting edge preparation of coated tools on their performance in milling various materials. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 7:264–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Denkena B, Köhler J, Breidenstein B (2014) Influence of the cutting edge preparation method on characteristics and performance of PVD coated carbide inserts in hard turning. Surf Coat Technol 254:447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stefania R, Paolo CP (2012) Effects of cutting angle, edge preparation, and nano-structured coating on milling performance of a gamma titanium aluminide. J Mater Process Technol 212:2619–2628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jamal SA, Parikshit C (2015) Effect of cutting edge geometry on thermal stresses and failure of diamond coated tools. Proc Manuf 1:663–674Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Charalampousa P, Bouzakisa KD, Kotsanisa T (2017) Effect of HM substrates’ cutting edge roundness manufactured by laser machining and micro-blasting on the coated tools’ cutting performance. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 18:188–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu X, Mao J, Zhang Z, Che Y (2015) Improving the properties of 211Z Al alloy by enhanced electroless Ni–P–TiO2 nanocomposite coatings with TiO 2 sol. Surf Coat Technol 270:170–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernhard K, Konrad S et al (2013) Influence of tool edge preparation on performance of ceramic tool inserts when hard turning. J Mater Process Technol 213:1978–1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jaroslava F, Janda Zdeněk (2014) Influence of the cutting edge radius and the cutting edge preparation on tool life and cutting forces at inserts with wiper geometry. Proc Eng 69:565–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saraswathamma K, Sunil J (2015) Experimental investigation into ball end magnetorheological finishing of silicon. Precis Eng 42:218–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eckart U, Steffen H, Katrin B (2015) Influence of the built-up edge on the stress state in the chip formation zone during orthogonal cutting of AISI1045. Proc CIRP 313:10–315Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prateek K, Pulak M (2015) Comparison of finishing characteristics of two paramagnetic materials using double disc magnetic abrasive finishing. J Manuf Processes 17:63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering CollegeGuizhou UniversityGuiyangChina

Personalised recommendations