Advertisement

Visualization analysis of the working process and dynamic characteristics comparison of a hydraulically damped rubber mount with resonant column channel

  • Xin He
  • Yanan WangEmail author
  • Chen Lian
  • Qingfeng Li
Technical Paper
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Combined with the finite element analysis (FEA) technology of fluid–structure interaction and nonlinear large deformation material, the integral FE models of a type of hydraulically damped rubber mount (HDM) with resonant column channel are set up. Based on the visualized simulation results, the working process of the HDMs is analysed, and the dynamic stiffness and the loss angles are compared. The calculation results show that the variation of the dynamic stiffness and the loss angle in the low-frequency domain is related to the flux and its hysteresis in the column channel. The effects of the decoupling membranes and the disturbing plate on the low-frequency dynamic characteristics are investigated by calculations. Results show that the setting of the decoupling membranes and their stiffness greatly change the dynamic stiffness and the loss angle of the HDM in the frequency domain below 50 Hz. And the disturbing plate and the variation of its diameter also affect the dynamic characteristics in the same frequency range. The accuracy of the FEA calculation is verified by the experiment.

Keywords

Hydraulically damped rubber mount Resonant column channel Working process Dynamic characteristics Decoupling membrane Disturbing plate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51405269) and Excellent Middle-Aged and Youth Scientist Award Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant No. BS2014ZZ003).

References

  1. 1.
    Yu Y, Naganathan NG, Dukkipati RV (2001) A literature review of automotive vehicle engine mounting systems. Mech Mach Theory 36(1):123–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Christopherson J, Jazar GN (2006) Dynamic behavior comparison of passive hydraulic engine mounts. Part 1: mathematical analysis. J Sound Vib 290(3):1040–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    He S, Singh R (2007) Discontinuous compliance nonlinearities in the hydraulic engine mount. J Sound Vib 307(3):545–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tabatabaei SK, Behbahani S, de Silva CW (2016) Self-adjusting multidisciplinary design of hydraulic engine mount using bond graphs and inductive genetic programming. Eng Appl Artif Intell 48:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tikani R, Vahdati N, Ziaei-Red S (2012) Two-mode operation engine mount design for automotive applications. Shock Vib 19(6):1267–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fan RL, Lü ZH (2007) Fixed points on the nonlinear dynamic properties of hydraulic engine mounts and parameter identification method: experiment and theory. J Sound Vib 305(4):703–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang YX, Zhao JW, Shangguan WB (2007) Modeling and parameter identification for a passive hydraulic mount. Int J Automob Technol 8(2):233–241Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    He S, Singh R (2005) Estimation of amplitude and frequency dependent parameters of hydraulic engine mount given limited dynamic stiffness measurements. Noise Control Eng J 53(6):271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yoon JY, Singh R (2010) Indirect measurement of dynamic force transmitted by a nonlinear hydraulic mount under sinusoidal excitation with focus on super-harmonics. J Sound Vib 329(25):5249–5272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barszcz B, Dreyer JT, Singh R (2012) Experimental study of hydraulic engine mounts using multiple inertia tracks and orifices: narrow and broad band tuning concepts. J Sound Vib 331(24):5209–5223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hausberg F, Scheiblegger C, Pfeffer P (2015) Experimental and analytical study of secondary path variations in active engine mounts. J Sound Vib 340:22–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramachandran T, Padmanaban KP, Nesamani P (2012) Modeling and analysis of IC engine rubber mount using finite element method and RSM. Proc Eng 38:1683–1692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim WD, Lee HJ, Kim JY (2004) Fatigue life estimation of an engine rubber mount. Int J Fatigue 26(5):553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee BS, Rivin EI (1996) Finite element analysis of load-deflection and creep characteristics of compressed rubber components for vibration control devices. J Mech Des 118(3):328–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Christopherson J, Jazar GN (2006) Dynamic behavior comparison of passive hydraulic engine mounts. Part 2: finite element analysis. J Sound Vib 290(3):1071–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang LR, Lü ZH, Hagiwara I (2010) Integration of experiment and hydrostatic fluid–structure finite element analysis into dynamic characteristic prediction of a hydraulically damped rubber mount. Int J Autom Technol 11(2):245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shangguan WB, Lü ZH (2004) Modelling of a hydraulic engine mount with fluid–structure interaction finite element analysis. J Sound Vib 275(1–2):193–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shangguan WB, Lü ZH (2004) Experimental study and simulation of a hydraulic engine mount with fully coupled fluid–structure interaction finite element analysis model. Comput Struct 82(22):1751–1771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jahani K, Dehnad M (2014) Identifying the frequency dependent material property of a hydraulic engine mount through an iterative procedure using 3D finite element modeling. J Mech Sci Technol 28(6):2041–2047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Christopherson J, Mahinfalah M, Jazar RN (2011) Suspended decoupler: a new design of hydraulic engine mount. Adv Acoust Vib 2012:1–11Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang RL, Lü ZH, Hagiwara I (2010) Analytical analysis approach to nonlinear dynamic characteristics of hydraulically damped rubber mount for vehicle engine. Nonlinear Dyn 61(1–2):251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim B, Lee SB, Lee J (2012) A comparison among Neo-Hookean model, Mooney-Rivlin model, and Ogden model for chloroprene rubber. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(5):759–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marzbani H, Jazaar RN, Fard M (2014) Hydraulic engine mounts: a survey. J Vib Control 20(10):1439–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xin He
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yanan Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Chen Lian
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Qingfeng Li
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShandong UniversityJinanChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture of Ministry of EducationShandong UniversityJinanChina
  3. 3.National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical Engineering Education, Shandong UniversityJinanChina

Personalised recommendations