Advertisement

Maintenance of hydroerosive grinding efficiency based on particle size distribution of abrasive fluid

  • Giuseppe PintaudeEmail author
  • Marina I. Grabarski
  • Pâmela P. Moreira
Technical Paper
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

The hydroerosive grinding is one of the processes to manufacture diesel injection nozzles, being responsible for finishing injection holes. The process made use of an abrasive fluid under high pressure into these channels. Its efficiency depends on the physical properties of the abrasive fluid. Based on a previous investigation, this study verified the possibility of using a different particle size distribution of boron carbide to improve the process efficiency. All experiments were carried out in an industrial environment. The variation in process efficiency was compared with the maintenance of the viscosity along the production, and at the same time, the concentration of solids was constantly monitored. The alteration of particle size distribution was not suitable, causing an increase in the average particle size. In addition, we have verified that the concentration of solids presented a major influence on the process efficiency, being the lower the concentration, the lower the efficiency.

Keywords

Hydroerosive grinding Boron carbide Injection nozzle Particle size distribution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Robert Bosch Ltda for providing funding as part of Project ACT 02/2013. G. Pintaude would like to thank CNPq for the financial support provided under Project 308416/2017-1.

References

  1. 1.
    Weickert M, Sommerfeld M, Teike G et al (2011) Experimental and numerical investigation of the hydroerosive grinding. Powder Technol 214:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diver C, Atkinson J, Befrui B et al (2007) Improving the geometry and quality of a micro-hole fuel injection nozzle by means of hydroerosive grinding. J Eng Manuf 221(Part B):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Potz D, Christ W, Dittus B (2000) Diesel Nozzle—the determining interface between injection system and combustion chamber. Thermo-and fluid-dynamic processes in diesel engines. Springer, Berlin, pp 133–143Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fang L, Sun K, Cen Q (2007) Particle movement patterns and their prediction in abrasive flow machining. Lubr Sci 13(4):195–206Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adachi K, Hutchings IM (2003) Wear-mode mapping for the micro-scale abrasion test. Wear 255(1–6):23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bulsara VH, Ahn Y, Chandrasekar S et al (1998) Mechanics of polishing. J Appl Mech 65:410–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coseglio MSDR, Moreira PP, Procopio HL et al (2016) Analysis of the efficiency of hydroerosive grinding without renewal of abrasive particles. J Manuf Sci Eng 138 paper 031007:1–9Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    BS EM 10084:2008, 2008, Case hardening steels—technical delivery conditions. BSI British Standards, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gao Y, Li K (2012) New models for calculating the viscosity of mixed oil. Fuel 95:431–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moreira PP, Grabarski MI, Pintaude G (2015) Maintenance of hydroerosive grinding process efficiency based on the abrasive fluid viscosity. In: VII Brazilian conference on rheology: paper BCR33Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Humphrey J (1990) Fundamentals of fluid motion in erosion by solid particle impact. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 11(3):170–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moreira PP (2015) Adjust of abrasive fluid viscosity for maintenance of hydroerosive grinding efficiency. Dissertation, Federal University of Technology, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clark HM (2002) Particle velocity and size effects in laboratory slurry erosion measurements OR… do you know what your particles are doing? Tribol Int 35(10):617–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Messa GV, Malavasi S (2018) A CFD-based method for slurry erosion prediction. Wear 398:127–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Tecnológica Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto Federal do ParanáParanaguáBrazil

Personalised recommendations