Advertisement

Characterization of dry sliding wear mechanisms of AA5083/B4C metal matrix composite

  • Ram SinghEmail author
  • Malik Shadab
  • Aruntapan Dash
  • R. N. Rai
Technical Paper
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

Aluminium alloy is known to be a soft material with inadequate hardness, poor wear resistance and good castability; in order to improve its wear resistance, numerous researches have been conducted. This paper deals with the wear mechanisms of aluminium alloy (AA5083) composites reinforced with boron carbide (B4C) particles having 300 mesh size. The fabrication of aluminium metal matrix composite specimen by varying boron carbide in 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% of the weight of aluminium alloy was produced (composite-A, composite-B, composite-C and composite-D, respectively) by the stir-casting technique. The wear mechanisms of the developed metal matrix composites were studied at various parameters such as sliding distance (1000 m, 2000 m and 3000 m), load (30 N, 40 N and 50 N) and sliding velocity (1 m/s, 2 m/s and 3 m/s). The wear mechanisms of the prepared specimen (composites-A, B, C and D) were compared with each other under the same experimental condition on the pin-on-disc wear machine. The major findings in this paper are: the better wear resistance property of the developed metal matrix composites than that of the alloy used as matrix, the wear of composite has been linear and effortless prediction of the wear characteristics by the researchers.

Keywords

AA5083 MMC Composites Stir casting B4

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Peng HX, Fan Z, Mudher DS, Evans JR (2002) Microstructures and mechanical properties of engineered short fibre reinforced aluminium matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A 335:207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kok M (2005) Production and mechanical properties of Al2O3 particle-reinforced 2024 aluminium alloy composites. J Mater Process Technol 161:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yigezu BS, Jha PK, Mahapatra MM (2013) The key attributes of synthesizing ceramic particulate reinforced Al-based matrix composites through stir casting process: a review. Mater Manuf Process 28:969–979Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gladston JA, Dinaharan I, Sheriff NM, Selvam JD (2017) Dry sliding wear behavior of AA6061 aluminum alloy composites reinforced rice husk ash particulates produced using compocasting. J Asian Ceram Soc 5:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dou Y, Liu Y, Liu Y, Xiong Z, Xia Q (2014) Friction and wear behaviors of B4C/6061Al composite. Mater Des 60:669–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rao RN, Das S (2010) Effect of matrix alloy and influence of SiC particle on the sliding wear characteristics of aluminium alloy composites. Mater Des 31:1200–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sudarshan Surappa MK (2008) Dry sliding wear of fly ash particle reinforced A356 Al composites. Wear 265:349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang J, Alpas AT (1993) Wear regimes and transitions in Al2O3 particulate-reinforced aluminum alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 161:273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kumar GN, Narayanasamy R, Natarajan S, Babu SK, Sivaprasad K, Sivasankaran S (2010) Dry sliding wear behaviour of AA 6351-ZrB2 in situ composite at room temperature. Mater Des 31:1526–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kennedy AR, Brampton B (2001) The reactive wetting and incorporation of B 4 C particles into molten aluminium. Scripta Mater 7:1077–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu HM, Lavernia EJ, Harrigan WC, Kajuch J, Nutt SR (2001) Microstructural investigation on B4C/Al-7093 composite. Mater Sci Eng A 297:94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lillo TM (2005) Enhancing ductility of AL6061 + 10 wt% B4C through equal-channel angular extrusion processing. Mater Sci Eng A 410:443–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang H, Ramesh KT, Chin ES (2004) High strain rate response of aluminum 6092/B4C composites. Mater Sci Eng A 384:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shackelford JF, Han YH, Kim S, Kwon SH (2016) CRC materials science and engineering handbook. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Topcu I, Gulsoy HO, Kadioglu N, Gulluoglu AN (2009) Processing and mechanical properties of B4C reinforced Al matrix composites. J Alloys Compd 482:516–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baradeswaran A, Perumal AE (2013) Influence of B4C on the tribological and mechanical properties of Al 7075–B4C composites. Compos B 54:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deuis RL, Subramanian C, Yellup JM (1997) Dry sliding wear of aluminium composites—a review. Compos Sci Technol 57:415–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huang SX, Paxton K (1998) A macrocomposite Al brake rotor for reduced weight and improved performance. JOM 50:26–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Challen B, Baranescu R (1999) Diesel engine reference book. McFarland, JeffersonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mahdavi S, Akhlaghi F (2011) Effect of the graphite content on the tribological behavior of Al/Gr and Al/30SiC/Gr composites processed by in situ powder metallurgy (IPM) method. Tribol Lett 44:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mindivan H, Kayali ES, Cimenoglu H (2008) Tribological behavior of squeeze cast aluminum matrix composites. Wear 265:645–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mishra AK, Sheokand R, Srivastava RK (2012) Tribological behaviour of Al 6061/SiC metal matrix composite by Taguchi’s Techniques. IJSRP 2:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jiang L, Yang H, Yee JK, Mo X, Topping T, Lavernia EJ, Schoenung JM (2016) Toughening of aluminum matrix nanocomposites via spatial arrays of boron carbide spherical nanoparticles. Acta Mater 103:128–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karabulut Ş, Karakoc H, Çıtak R (2016) Influence of B4C particle reinforcement on mechanical and machining properties of Al6061/B4C composites. Compos B 101:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sharifi EM, Karimzadeh F, Enayati MH (2011) Fabrication and evaluation of mechanical and tribological properties of boron carbide reinforced aluminum matrix nanocomposites. Mater Des 32:3263–3271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moazami-Goudarzi M, Akhlaghi F (2016) Wear behavior of Al 5252 alloy reinforced with micrometric and nanometric SiC particles. Tribol Int 102:28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Singh J (2016) Fabrication characteristics and tribological behavior of Al/SiC/Gr hybrid aluminum matrix composites: a review. Friction 4:191–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tang F, Wu X, Ge S, Ye J, Zhu H, Hagiwara M, Schoenung JM (2008) Dry sliding friction and wear properties of B4C particulate-reinforced Al-5083 matrix composites. Wear 264:555–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Singh R, Rai RN (2018) Characterization of B4C-composite-reinforced aluminum alloy composites. AIP Conf Proc 1943:020073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hariprasad T, Varatharajan K, Ravi S (2014) Wear characteristics of B4C and Al2O3 reinforced with Al 5083 metal matrix based hybrid composite. Procedia Eng 97:925–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang Z, Topping T, Li Y, Vogt R, Zhou Y, Haines C, Paras J, Kapoor D, Schoenung JM, Lavernia EJ (2011) Mechanical behavior of ultrafine-grained Al composites reinforced with B4C nanoparticles. Scripta Mater 65:652–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Alizadeh A, Abdollahi A, Biukani H (2015) Creep behavior and wear resistance of Al 5083 based hybrid composites reinforced with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and boron carbide (B4C). J Alloys Compd 650:783–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhao Q, Liang Y, Zhang Z, Li X, Ren L (2016) Microstructure and dry-Sliding wear behavior of B4C ceramic particulate reinforced Al 5083 matrix composite. Metals 6:227–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kumar BA, Murugan N, Dinaharan I (2014) Dry sliding wear behavior of stir cast AA6061-T6/AlNp composite. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 24:2785–2795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Van Thuong N, Zuhailawati H, Seman AA, Huy TD, Dhindaw BK (2015) Microstructural evolution and wear characteristics of equal channel angular pressing processed semi-solid-cast hypoeutectic aluminum alloys. Mater Des 67:448–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Anasyida AS, Daud AR, Ghazali MJ (2010) Dry sliding wear behaviour of Al–12Si–4 Mg alloy with cerium addition. Mater Des 31:365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bhushan B (1990) Tribology and mechanics of magnetic storage devices, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 231–265Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kori SA, Chandrashekharaiah TM (2007) Studies on the dry sliding wear behaviour of hypoeutectic and eutectic Al–Si alloys. Wear 263:745–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dwivedi DK, Arjun TS, Thakur P, Vaidya H, Singh K (2004) Sliding wear and friction behaviour of Al–18% Si–0.5% Mg alloy. J Mater Process Technol 152:323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vencl A, Bobic I, Stojanovic B (2014) Tribological properties of A356 Al-Si alloy composites under dry sliding conditions. Ind Lubr Tribol 66:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Production EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyAgartalaIndia

Personalised recommendations