Advertisement

Effects of variable-volume Helmholtz resonator on air mass flow rate of intake manifold

  • Sérgio de Morais HanriotEmail author
  • Jaqueline Mendes Queiroz
  • Cristiana Brasil Maia
Review
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

The application of geometric modifications to the intake manifold to improve engine breathing provides positive results using different strategies. Helmholtz resonators (HR) are one of the most basic acoustic models and are widely used in engineering applications. Most of the works presented in the literature focus on the use of HR in the fields of acoustics. The present work experimentally investigates pulsating flow characteristics of the engine intake manifold and the effects of a Helmholtz resonator with variable internal volume. In this paper, acoustic studies were used to model the intake manifold and to develop a complex expression to determine the natural frequency of the system. The model included the primary and secondary intake pipes and the resonator. Experiments were conducted on a straight intake pipe connected to an engine cylinder head mounted on a test flow bench, especially designed for fluid dynamic studies of engine intake systems with unsteady flow conditions. Using electronic controls, the internal volume of the resonator was varied and adjusted according to the frequency of the valves as well as the natural frequency of the intake manifold. The natural frequency of the system was determined from a numerical model of the intake manifold. The results showed the internal volume of the resonator and frequency tuning affect the intake air mass flow rate at a wide range of camshaft velocities. For a fixed volume, the average increase of the mass flow rate was 17.8%, and when the volume was adjusted according to valve frequency, the average increase was 24.7%. The highest intake air mass flow rate was increased 31.5% when the resonator was tuned to the frequency of the system.

Keywords

Internal combustion engine Variable Helmholtz resonator Intake system Pulsating flow Gas dynamics 

List of symbols

Ap

Cross-sectional area of the straight section of the neck (m2)

At

Cross-sectional area of the straight section of tube (m2)

c

Speed of sound (m/s)

Car

Acoustic capacitance of the resonator (m4 s2/kg)

f

Frequency of resonance (Hz)

fr

Frequency of resonator (Hz)

HR

Helmholtz resonator

H1L

1 L internal volume resonator

HFV

Helmholtz resonator tuned to the valve frequency

HSF

Helmholtz resonator tuned to the system frequency

L

Length of the pipe (m)

L1

Partial length of the pipe between resonator and reference point (m)

L2

Partial length of the intake pipe before resonator (m)

lp

Length of the neck (m)

ρ

Air density (kg/m3)

Mr

Inertia of the neck of the resonator (kg/m4)

Rar

Acoustic resistance of the resonator (kg/m4 s)

rt

Radius of the tube (m)

V

Volume of the resonator chamber (m3)

Zar

Acoustic impedance of the resonator (kg/m4 s)

ZL1

Impedance of the closed-end pipe (kg/m4 s)

ZL2

Impedance of the open-end pipe (kg/m4 s)

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank FIAT CHRYSLER, PUC Minas, CAPES, CNPq and FAPEMIG for the financial support of this project.

References

  1. 1.
    Song HS, Cho HM (2017) A study on duct integrated resonator of automobile intake system. Int J Appl Eng Res 12(18):7696–7699Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alves LOF, dos Santos MGD, Urquiza AB, Guerrero JH, de Lira JC, Abramchuk V (2017) Design of a new intake manifold of a single cylinder engine with three stages. SAE technical paper 2017-36-0172Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aradhye O, Bari S (2017) Continuously varying exhaust pipe length and diameter to improve the performance of a naturally aspirated SI engine. In: ASME 2017 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. American Society of Mechanical EngineersGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ceviz MA (2007) Intake plenum volume and its influence on the engine performance, cyclic variability and emissions. Energy Convers Manag 48:961–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ceviz MA, Akın M (2010) Design of a new SI engine intake manifold with variable length plenum. Energy Convers Manag 51:2239–2244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Costa RC, Hanriot SM, Sodré JR (2014) Influence of intake pipe length and diameter on the performance of a spark ignition engine. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 36(1):29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bortoluzzi D, Cossalter V, Doria A (1998) The effect of tuneable resonators on the volumetric efficiency of an engine. SAE paper 983045Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghodke S, Bari S (2018) Effect of integrating variable intake runner diameter and variable intake valve timing on an SI engine’s performance. SAE technical paper 2018-01-0380Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kassim MN, Idres M, Ahmad MI, Rizman ZI (2015) Computational analysis of air intake system for internal combustion engine in presence of acoustic resonator. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 10:9468–9475Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kastner LJ (1947) An investigation of the airbox method of measuring the air consumption of internal combustion engines. Proc IMechE 157:387–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dupère IDJ, Dowling AP (2005) The use of Helmholtz resonators in a practical combustor. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 127(2):268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brads MC (1979) Helmholtz tuned induction system for turbocharged diesel engine. SAE Paper 790069Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ih JG, Kim H-J, Lee S-H, Shinoda K (2009) Prediction of intake noise of an automotive engine in run-up condition. Appl Acoust 70:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pogorevc P, Kegl B (2006) Intake system design procedure for engines with special requirements. J Automob Eng 220(2):241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nair SU, Shete CD, Subramoniam A, Handoo KL, Padmanabhan C (2010) Experimental and computational investigation of coupled resonator–cavity systems. Appl Acoust 71:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Selamet A, Kothamasu V, Novak JM (2001) Insertion loss of a Helmholtz resonator in the intake system of internal combustion engines: an experimental and computational investigation. Appl Acoust 62:381–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bortoluzzi D, Doria A, Cossalter V (1998) The effect of tunable resonators on the volumetric efficiency of an Engine. SAE paper no 983045. SAE International, DearbornGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kostun JD, Lin JS (1994) Effect of resonator location on resonator effectiveness using NASTRAN mode shape prediction analysis and LAMPS acoustic model. SAE paper no 940614Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Selamet A, Lee I (2003) Helmholtz resonator with extended neck. J Acoust Soc Am 113:1975–1985.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1558379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hanriot SM, Valle RM, Sodré JR, Queiroz JM (2013) Helmholtz resonator effects on engine intake air mass flow rate. In: 22nd international congress of mechanical engineering, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil, 3–7 November 2013Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Queiroz JM, Hanriot SM, Maia CB (2014) Influence of transient phenomena in the discharge coefficient through the intake valve in an internal combustion engine. In: 10th international conference on heat transfer, fluid mechanics and thermodynamics, Orlando, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Corá R, Martins CA, Lacava PT (2014) Acoustic instabilities control using Helmholtz resonators. Appl Acoust 77:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang Z, Zhao D, Han N, Wang S, Li J (2015) Control of combustion instability with a tunable Helmholtz resonator. Aerosp Sci Technol 41:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coulon JM, Atalla N, Desrochers A (2016) Optimization of concentric array resonators for wide band noise reduction. Appl Acoust 113:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cai C, Mak CM, Shi X (2017) An extended neck versus a spiral neck of the Helmholtz resonator. Appl Acoust 115:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manmadhacharya A, Kumara MS, Kumara YR (2017) Design and manufacturing of spiral intake manifold to improve Volumetric efficiency of injection diesel engine by AM process. Mater Today Proc 4:1084–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li L, Liu Y, Zhang F, Sun Z (2017) Several explanations on the theoretical formula of Helmholtz resonator. Adv Eng Softw 114:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cai C, Mak CM (2018) Acoustic performance of different Helmholtz resonator array configurations. Appl Acoust 130:204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Queiroz JM (2015) Influência de ressonador de Helmholtz e da geometria do sistema de admissão na vazão de ar de um motor de combustão interna. Tese de Doutorado, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, PUC, Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Benajes J, Reyes E, Galindo J, Peidro J (1997) Pre-design model for intake manifolds in internal combustion engines. SAE paper No 970055Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Winterbone DE, Pearson RJ (1999) Design techniques for engine manifolds: wave action methods for IC engines. SAE, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hanriot SM (2001) Study of transient phenomena in intake manifolds. Ph.D. thesis (in Portuguese), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kinsler LE et al (1999) Fundamentals of acoustics, 4th edn. Wiley, New York, p 560. ISBN 0-471-84789-5Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hall DE, Hall DE (1987) Basic acoustics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dorf RC, Bishop RH (2001) Sistemas de controle modernos, 8th edn. LTC – Livros Técnicos e Científicos, Rio de Janeiro (In Portuguese) Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gerges SNY (1992) Ruído: fundamentos e controle. Florianopolis. ISBN 8590004601X (broch.)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPontifical Catholic University of Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations