Advertisement

The influence of tool geometry and process parameters on joined sheets by clinching

  • Marcio Brandani Tenorio
  • Sergio Fernando Lajarin
  • Manolo Lutero Gipiela
  • Paulo Victor Prestes MarcondesEmail author
Technical Paper
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

In this work, the process of clinching was studied through practical experiments and also by computer simulation using finite element method (FEM). The influence of different joint geometries and process parameters on the strength of joints joined by clinching was studied. Subsequently, a practical study with the aim of comparing its results with FEM results was carried out. It was possible to observe that the geometry of the clinching tool and the choice of process parameters influence the interlocking strength. FEM simulations showed similar results to the practical experiments and also avoided the manufacture of different tools and the accomplishment of several experiments.

Keywords

Joining Clinching Computational simulation Manufacturing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank ArcelorMittal company for supplying the steels used in this study and also to CNPQ for the financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Groche P, Wohletz S, Brenneis M, Pabst C, Resch F (2014) Joining by forming—a review on joint mechanisms, applications and future trends. J Mater Process Technol 214(10):1972–1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Varis J (2006) Economics of clinched joint compared to riveted joint and example of applying calculations to a volume product. J Mater Process Technol 172(1):130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mori KI, Bay N, Fratini L, Micari F, Tekkaya AE (2013) Joining by plastic deformation. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(2):673–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    He X (2017) Clinching for sheet materials. Sci Technol Adv Mater 18(1):381–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Paula A, Aguilar M, Pertence A, Cetlin PR (2007) Finite element simulations of the clinch joining of metallic sheets. J Mater Process Technol 82(1):352–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lajarin SF, Tenorio MB (2015) Simulação por elementos finitos da infuência da geometria de ferramenta na união por clinching, 8° COBEF Salvador, Bahia, Brasil (Portuguese) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lambiase F, DiIlio A (2014) An experimental study on clinched joints realized with different dies. Thin Walled Struct 85:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mori K, Abe Y, Kato T (2012) Mechanism of superiority of fatigue strength for aluminium alloy sheets joined by mechanical clinching and self-pierce riveting. J Mater Process Technol 212:1900–1905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim H (2013) Fatigue strength evaluation of the clinched lap joints of a cold rolled mild steel sheet. J Mater Eng Perform 22:294–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Su Z, Lin P, Lai W, Pan J (2015) Fatigue analyses of self-piercing rivets and clinch joints in lap-shear specimens of aluminum sheets. Int J Fatigue 72:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang Y, He X, Wang Y, Lu Y, Gu F, Ball A (2018) Study on failure mechanism of mechanical clinching in aluminium sheet materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(9–12):3057–3068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen C, Zhao S, Han X, Cui M, Fan S (2016) Optimization of a reshaping rivet to reduce the protrusion height and increase the strength of clinched joints. J Mater Process Technol 234:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen C, Zhao S, Han X, Cui M, Fan S (2016) Investigation of the height-reducing method for clinched joint with Al5052 and Al6061. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(5–8):1–8Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen C, Zhao S, Han X, Cui M, Zhao X, Ishida T (2017) Experimental investigation of the mechanical reshaping process for joining aluminum alloy sheets with different thicknesses. J Manuf Process 26:105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen C, Zhao S, Han X, Cui M, Fan S (2016) Investigation of mechanical behavior of the reshaped joints realized with different reshaping forces. Thin Walled Struct 107:266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen C, Han X, Zhao S, Xu F, Zhao X (2017) Comparative study on two compressing methods of clinched joints with dissimilar aluminum alloy sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5–8):1929–1937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen C, Zhao S, Cui M, Han X, Fan S, Ishida T (2016) An experimental study on the compressing process for joining Al6061 sheets. Thin Walled Struct 108:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eshtayeh MM, Hrairi M, Mohiuddin AKM (2016) Clinching process for joining dissimilar materials: state of the art. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82:179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang CC, Kam HK, Cheong WC (2014) Effect of tool eccentricity on the joint strength in mechanical clinching process. Procedia Eng 81:2062–2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mucha J (2011) The analysis of lock forming mechanism in the clinching joint. J Mater Des 32(10):4943–4954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Abe Y, Mori K, Kato T (2012) Joining of high strength steel and aluminium alloy sheets by mechanical clinching with dies for control of metal flow. J Mater Process Technol 212(4):884–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee C-J, Kim J-Y, Lee S-K, Ko D-C, Kim B-M (2010) Parametric study on mechanical clinching process for joining aluminum alloy and high-strength steel sheets. J Mater Process Technol 24(1):123–126Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oudjene M, Ben-Ayed L (2008) On the parametrical study of clinch joining of metallic sheets using the Taguchi method. Eng Struct 30(6):1782–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Caron FAZ, Rocha DR, Tenorio MB, Lajarin SF, Marcondes PVP (2014) Influencia dos parâmetros de processo e ferramenta na união de chapas metálicas por abotoamento (clinching). In: 1° Congresso Brazilian Deep Drawing Research Group, 2014, Porto Alegre. (In Portuguese) Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    ABAQUS (2012) Theory manuals version 6.12, Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen Inc., RI, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcio Brandani Tenorio
    • 1
  • Sergio Fernando Lajarin
    • 1
  • Manolo Lutero Gipiela
    • 2
  • Paulo Victor Prestes Marcondes
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Mechanical EngineeringFederal University of ParanaCuritibaBrazil
  2. 2.Faculty of Technology SENAI CICNational Service for Industrial Apprenticeship in ParanáCuritibaBrazil

Personalised recommendations