Effect of Al2O3 nanoparticles and strontium addition on structural, mechanical and tribological properties of Zn25Al3Si alloy

  • Aleksandar VenclEmail author
  • Biljana Bobić
  • Filip Vučetić
  • Petr Svoboda
  • Vladimir Popović
  • Ilija Bobić
Technical Paper


Nanocomposites were synthesized via compocasting using Zn25Al3Si and Zn25Al3Si0.03Sr alloys as the matrices and nanoparticles of Al2O3 (1 wt%) as the reinforcement. Structure of the nanocomposites was examined, and their basic mechanical and tribological properties were tested. Distribution of primary silicon particles in the structure of nanocomposites has been improved compared to their distribution in the Zn25Al3Si matrix alloy due to the presence of Al2O3 nanoparticles and strontium. The primary silicon particles in the structure of the nanocomposites were found to be more fine-grained compared to the same particles in the structure of the as-cast Zn25Al3Si alloy. Tested mechanical properties of the nanocomposite with Zn25Al3Si alloy matrix are improved, compared to the matrix alloy. The nanocomposite with Zn25Al3Si0.03Sr alloy matrix is characterized with slightly higher value of compressive yield strength and a slightly lower hardness value compared to the as-cast Zn25Al3Si alloy. Both nanocomposites showed lower wear rate and higher coefficient of friction, compared to the matrix alloy, in sliding under the boundary lubricating regime. However, the nanocomposite with Zn25Al3Si alloy matrix showed better tribological properties than the nanocomposite with Zn25Al3Si0.03Sr alloy matrix.


Zn–Al–Si alloys Strontium Al2O3 nanoparticles Microstructure Fractography Mechanical properties Boundary lubrication Friction Wear 



This work has been performed as a part of activities within the Projects OI 172005, TR 35021 and TR 35045. These projects are supported by the Republic of Serbia, Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, whose financial help is gratefully acknowledged. Petr Svoboda acknowledges the Project FSI-S-14-2336 from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of Czech Republic.


  1. 1.
    Prasad BK, Yegneswaran AH, Patwardhan AK (1996) Characterization of the wear response of a modified zinc-based alloy vis-à-vis a conventional zinc-based alloy and a bearing bronze at a high sliding speed. Metall Mater Trans A 27(11):3513–3523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gervais E, Barnhurst RJ, Loong CA (1985) An analysis of selected properties of ZA alloys. J Met (JOM) 37(11):43–47Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASTM B 86 Standard specification for zinc and zinc-aluminum (ZA) alloy foundry and die castingsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ninković R, Babić M, Rac A (2000) Yugoslav Zn–Al alloys as bearings material. Tribol Ind 22(1–2):14–18Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lyon R (1985) High strength zinc alloys for engineering applications in motor cars. Met Mater 1:55–57Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murphy S, Savaskan T (1987) Metallography of zinc–25% Al based alloys in the as-cast and aged conditions. Pract Metallogr 24(5):204–221Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee PP, Savaskan T, Laufer E (1987) Wear resistance and microstructure of Zn–Al–Si and Zn–Al–Cu alloys. Wear 117(1):79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Savaskan T, Murphy S (1987) Mechanical properties and lubricated wear of Zn–25Al-based alloys. Wear 116(2):211–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jian L, Laufer EE, Masounave J (1993) Wear in Zn–Al–Si alloys. Wear 165(1):51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Segawa T, Sato T, Kimura Y (1983) Effects of Al and Si of zinc alloys on the bearing performance under conditions of boundary lubrication. J Jpn Inst Met Mater 47(6):515–520 (in Japanese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zyska A, Konopka Z, Łągiewka M, Nadolski M (2011) Structure and selected properties of high-aluminium Zn alloy with silicon addition. Arch Foundry Eng 11(3):261–264Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prasad BK, Modi OP (2009) Slurry wear characteristics of zinc-based alloys: effects of sand content of slurry, silicon addition to alloy system and traversal distance. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 19(2):277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Savaşkan T, Pürçek G, Murphy S (2002) Sliding wear of cast zinc-based alloy bearings under static and dynamic loading conditions. Wear 252(9–10):693–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vencl A, Bobić I, Vučetić F, Bobić B, Ružić J (2014) Structural, mechanical and tribological characterization of Zn25Al alloys with Si and Sr addition. Mater Des 64:381–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berent K, Pstruś J, Gancarz T (2016) Thermal and microstructure characterization of Zn–Al–Si alloys and chemical reaction with Cu substrate during spreading. J Mater Eng Perform 25(8):3375–3383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Choi H, Konishi H, Li X (2012) Al2O3 nanoparticles induced simultaneous refinement and modification of primary and eutectic Si particles in hypereutectic Al–20Si alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 541:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Choi H, Li X (2012) Refinement of primary Si and modification of eutectic Si for enhanced ductility of hypereutectic Al–20Si–4.5Cu alloy with addition of Al2O3 nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 47(7):3096–3102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Cicco MP, Li X, Turng L-S (2009) Semi-solid casting (SSC) of zinc alloy nanocomposites. J Mater Process Technol 209(18–19):5881–5885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aćimović-Pavlović Z, Raić KT, Bobić I, Bobić B (2011) Synthesis of ZrO2 particles reinforced ZA25 alloy composites by compocasting process. Adv Compos Mater 20(4):375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lehuy H, Masounave J, Blain J (1985) Rheological behaviour and microstructure of stir-casting zinc-aluminium alloys. J Mater Sci 20(1):105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    ASTM G 77 Standard test method for ranking resistance of materials to sliding wear using block-on-ring wear testGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Flemings MC (1991) Behavior of metal alloys in the semisolid state. Metall Trans A 22(5):957–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rac A (1991) Basics of tribology. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade (in Serbian) Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hamrock BJ, Schmid SR, Jacobson BO (2004) Fundamental of fluid film lubrication. Marcel Dekker, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rohatgi PK, Schultz B (2007) Lightweight metal matrix nanocomposites—stretching the boundaries of metals. Mater Matters 2(4):16–20Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Casati R, Vedani M (2014) Metal matrix composites reinforced by nano-particles—a review. Metals 4(1):65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Casati R, Amadio M, Biffi CA, Dellasega D, Tuissi A, Vedani M (2013) Al/Al2O3 nano-composite produced by ECAP. Mater Sci Forum 762:457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rohatgi PK, Moghadam AD, Schultz BF, Ferguson JB (2013) Synthesis and properties of metal matrix nanocomposites (MMnCs), syntactic foams, self lubricating and self-healing metals. In: Proceedings of the 8th Pacific Rim international conference on advanced materials and processing. Wiley, Hoboken, p 1515–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kandeva-Ivanova M, Vencl A, Karastoyanov D (2016) Advanced tribological coatings for heavy-duty applications: case studies. Prof. Marin Drinov Publishing House of Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, SofiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of BelgradeBelgrade 35Serbia
  2. 2.Institute of Chemistry, Technology and MetallurgyUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  3. 3.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringBrno University of TechnologyBrnoCzech Republic
  4. 4.Institute of Nuclear Sciences “Vinca”University of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations