Advertisement

Machining of fluidic channels on borosilicate glass using grinding-aided electrochemical discharge engraving (G-ECDE) and process optimization

  • V. G. LadeeshEmail author
  • R. Manu
Technical Paper

Abstract

Electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM) has already been identified as a novel process for machining advanced ceramics and glass. The major limitations of this process are high overcut of the machined channels and the difficulty in controlling the roughness of the channel. This paper presents a novel technique which uses diamond-impregnated engraving tool as the tool electrode for machining accurate and smooth channels on borosilicate glass using ECDM. This technique can be called as grinding-aided electrochemical discharge engraving (G-ECDE). The new method utilizes both the grinding action of diamond grits and the thermal and chemical effects of ECDM for material removal. Preliminary experiments are performed using Placket–Burman design with center points to study the effect of machining parameters like voltage, electrolyte concentration, pulse-on time, tool rotational speed and tool feed rate on channel overcut and surface roughness of the channel. With the significant factors identified from the preliminary experiment, the main experiment was performed using a widely used response surface design called Box–Behnken design to develop second-order response models for surface roughness and channel overcut. Response surface plots are used to identify the effect of parameters and their interactions on the responses. Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is used to optimize this multi-response problem. The optimum factor levels obtained from TOPSIS are a medium feed of 2 mm/min, a low voltage of 80 V, a medium pulse-on time of 0.0011 s and a low concentration of 2 M which produced channels with a surface roughness of 0.872 μm and overcut of 0.293 mm. From the microscopic images of machined channels, material removal mechanisms of G-ECDE are confirmed to be a combination of thermal melting due to electrochemical discharges, grinding action of diamond grits and high-temperature chemical etching action of the electrolyte. The performance of G-ECDE is compared with die-sinking ECDM and electrochemical discharge milling for producing channels and found that G-ECDE is the most suitable process to produce fluidic channel on glass which is free from recast layer and heat-affected zone. The results obtained from this study proved the potential of G-ECDE in producing smooth, accurate and complex fluidic channels on the glass.

Keywords

Grinding-aided electrochemical discharge engraving Placket–Burman design Box–Behnken design TOPSIS Response surface Fluidic channels Die-sinking ECDM Electrochemical discharge milling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by Kerala State Council for Science Technology and Environment (KSCSTE) under Technology Development and Adaptation Programme (TDAP) for the project titled “Development of a Hybrid Electrochemical Discharge Machine and its Performance Analysis” (Grant No. 935/2015/KSCSTE).

References

  1. 1.
    Wuthrich R, Hof LA (2006) The gas film in spark assisted chemical engraving (SACE)—a key element for micro-machining applications. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:828–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fascio V, Langen HH, Bleuler H, Comninellis Ch (2003) Investigations of the spark assisted chemical engraving. Electrochem Commun 5:203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yerokhin AL, Nie X, Leyland A, Maetthews A, Dowey SJ (1999) Plasma electrolysis for surface engineering. Surf Coat Technol 122:73–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    AbouZiki JD, Didar TF, Wuthrich R (2012) Micro-texturing channel surfaces on glass with spark assisted chemical engraving. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 57:66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jalali M, Maillard P, Wuthrich R (2009) Toward a better understanding of glass gravity-feed micro-hole drilling with electrochemical discharges. J Micromech Microeng 19(4):045001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kudla L (2009) Investigation into electrochemical discharge machining of microholes. J Autom Mob Robot Intell Syst 3:21–24Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jain VK, Adhikary S (2008) On the mechanism of material removal in electrochemical spark machining of quartz under different polarity conditions. J Mater Process Technol 200:460–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gautam N, Jain VK (1998) Experimental investigations into ECSD process using various tool kinematics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee ES, Howard D, Liang E, Collins SD, Smith RL (2004) Removable tubing interconnects for glass-based micro-fluidic systems made using ECDM. J Micromech Microeng 14:535–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang CK, Wu K-L, Hung J-C, Lee S-M, Lin J-C, Yan B-H (2011) Enhancement of ECDM efficiency and accuracy by spherical tool electrode. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(6):528–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chak SK, Rao PV (2007) Trepanning of Al2O3 by electro-chemical discharge machining (ECDM). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:2061–2070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu JW, Yue TM, Guo ZN (2013) Grinding-aided electrochemical discharge machining of particulate reinforced metal matrix composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:2349–2357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chak SK, Rao PV (2008) The drilling of Al2O3 using a pulsed DC supply with a rotary abrasive electrode by the electrochemical discharge process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39:633–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jain VK, Choudhury SK, Ramesh KM (2002) On the machining of alumina and glass. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:1269–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wuthrich R, Fascio V, Didier V, Langen H (1999) In situ measurement and micromachining of glass. In: International symposium on micromechatronics and human science (MHS'99)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cao XD, Kim BH, Chu CN (2013) Hybrid micromachining of glass using ECDM and micro grinding. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14(1):5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Han M-S, Chae KW, Min B-K (2017) Fabrication of high-aspect-ratio microgrooves using an electrochemical discharge micromilling process. J Micromech Microeng 27(5):055004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Behzadian M, Otaghsara SK, Yazdani M, Ignatius J (2012) A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst Appl 39(17):13051–13069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hwang CL, Yoon KP (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, New YorkzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, BerlinzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yoon KP, Hwang CL (1995) Multiple attribute decision making. Sage Publication, Thousand OaksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pratyush S, Yang J-B (1998) Multiple criteria decision support in engineering design. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nayak BB, Mahapatra SS (2013) Multi-response optimization of WEDM Process Parameters using the AHP and TOPSIS method. Int J Theor Appl Res Mech Eng 2(3):109–115Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Santhanam SKV, Rathinaraj L, Chandran R, Ramaiyan S (2015) Multi response optimization of submerged friction stir welding process parameters using topsis approach. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2015 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition (IMECE2015), Houston, Texas, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Manivannan R, Kumar MP (2016) Multi-response optimization of Micro-EDM process parameters on AISI304 steel using TOPSIS. J Mech Sci Technol 30(1):137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chakladar ND, Chakraborty S (2008) A combined TOPSIS-AHP-method-based approach for non-traditional machining processes selection. Proc IMechE B J Eng Manuf 222:1613–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paneerselvam R (2012) Design and analysis of experiments, 1st edn. PHI Learning Private Limited, Delhi, pp 22–27Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Krishnaiah K, Shahabudeen P (2012) applied design of experiments and taguchi methods, 2nd edn. PHI Learning Private Limited, New Delhi, pp 169–184Google Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Mathews Paul (2010) Design of experiments with minitab. New Age International (P) Limited Publishers, Chennai, pp 145–189Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tripathy S, Tripathy DK (2016) Multi-attribute optimization of machining process parameters in powder mixed electro-discharge machining using TOPSIS and grey relational analysis. Eng Sci Technol Int J 19:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rao RV (2013) Decision making in the manufacturing environment using graph theory and fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. Springer Ser Adv Manuf 2:10–12Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peng C, Du H, Liao TW (2017) A research on the cutting database system based on machining features and TOPSIS. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 43:96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gok A (2015) A new approach to minimization of the surface roughness and cutting force via fuzzy TOPSIS, multi-objective grey design and RSA. Measurement 70:100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ramesh S, Viswanathan R, Ambika S (2016) Measurement and optimization of surface roughness and tool wear via grey relational analysis, TOPSIS and RSA techniques. Measurement 78:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ladeesh VG, Manu R (2016) Development of fluidic channels using die sinking electrochemical discharge machining—a performance study and mathematical modelling. In: Proceedings of the 6th international and 27th all India manufacturing technology, design and research conference (AIMTDR-2016). College of Engineering Pune, India, pp 505–510Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Singh T, Dvivedi A (2016) Developments in electrochemical discharge machining: a review on electrochemical discharge machining, process variants and their hybrid methods. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 105:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology CalicutKozhikodeIndia

Personalised recommendations