Advertisement

Dry sliding wear characterization of red mud reinforced aluminium composite

  • Amit SharmaEmail author
  • R. M. Belokar
  • Sanjeev Kumar
Technical Paper
  • 106 Downloads

Abstract

This paper reports the wear performance of the developed Al2024/red mud MMC under dry conditions using a pin-on-disc wear setup. The effect of process parameters such as reinforcement, applied load, sliding velocity, and sliding distance on the wear performance of composite was studied. Two-step stir casting process was employed to fabricate the MMC in the presence of argon gas. Response surface methodology was employed to study the influence of input parameters on the wear rate of the composite. Mathematical model was developed to predict the wear rate of the composite. It was observed from the results that sliding velocity was found to be the most dominant factor that affected the wear behaviour of the MMC followed by applied load and reinforcement content. Worn surface of the test pieces was analyzed by SEM and the surface morphology reveals that the wear rate reduced with the increase in reinforcement content. EDS results were evaluated to characterize the MML that forms on the worn surfaces of the test specimens.

Keywords

Aluminium alloy Red mud RSM Wear rate Worn surface 

References

  1. 1.
    Pramanik A (2016) Effect of reinforcement on wear resistance of aluminium matrix composites. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 26:348–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jones RM (1975) Mechanics of composite materials. Scripta Book Company, Washington, p 1Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McDaniels DL (1985) Analysis of stress–strain, fracture and ductility behaviour of aluminium matrix composites containing discontinuous silicon carbide reinforcement. Metall Mater Trans A 16A:1105–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ralph B, Yuen HC, Lee WB (1997) The processing of metal matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 63:339–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karl UK (2006) Basics of metal matrix composites. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Company, Weinheim, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rohatgi PK (1993) Metal matrix composite. Def Sci J 43(4):323–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaur K, Anant R, Pandey OP (2010) Tribological behaviour of SiC particle reinforced Al–Si alloy. Tribol Lett 44:41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Das S, Das S, Das K (2007) Abrasive wear of zircon sand and alumina reinforced Al–4.5 wt%Cu alloy matrix composites—a comparative study. Compos Sci Technol 67:746–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Das S, Mondal DP, Dixit G (2001) Correlation of abrasive wear with microstructure and mechanical properties of pressure die-cast aluminium hard-particle composite. Metall Mater Trans A 32:633–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaur K, Pandey OP (2010) Microstructural characteristics of spray formed zircon sand reinforced LM13 composite. J Alloys Compd 503:410–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hashim J, Looney L, Hashmi MSJ (1999) Metal matrix composites: production by the stir casting method. J Mater Process Technol 92–93:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prabhu SB, Karunamoorthy L, Kathiresan S, Mohan B (2006) Influence of stirring speed and stirring time on distribution of particles in cast metal matrix composite. J Mater Process Technol 171:268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kok M (2005) Production and mechanical properties of Al2O3 particle reinforced 2024 aluminium alloy composite. J Mater Process Technol 161:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singla M, Dwivedi D, Singh L, Chawla V (2009) Development of aluminium based silicon carbide particulate metal matrix composite. J Miner Mater Charact Eng 8(6):455–467Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suresha S, Sridhara BK (2010) Wear characteristics of hybrid aluminium matrix composites reinforced with graphite and silicon particulates. Compos Sci Technol 70:1652–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thangarasu A, Murugan N, Dinaharan I, Vijay SJ (2014) Synthesis and characterization of titanium carbide particulate reinforced AA6082 aluminium alloy composites via friction stir processing. Arch Civ Mech Eng 15:324–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Uvaraja VC, Natarajan N (2012) Optimization of friction and wear behaviour in hybrid metal matrix composites using Taguchi technique. J Miner Mater Charact Eng 11(8):757–768Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baradeswaran A, Perumal AE (2014) Study on mechanical and wear properties of Al7075/Al2O3/graphite hybrid composites. Compos B 56:464–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Radhika N, Raghu R (2015) Dry sliding wear behaviour of aluminium Al–Si12Cu/TiB2 metal matrix composite using response surface methodology. Tribol Lett 59:2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Premnath AA, Alwarsamy T, Rajmohan T, Prabhu R (2014) The influence of alumina on mechanical and tribological characteristics of graphite particle reinforced hybrid Al-MMC. J Mech Sci Technol 28(11):4737–4744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Akhlaghi F, Zare-Bidaki A (2009) Influence of graphite content on dry sliding and oil impregnated sliding wear behaviour of Al2024–graphite composites produced by in situ powder metallurgy method. Wear 266(1–2):37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perez-Bustamante R, Beuno-Escobedo JL, Jimenez-Lobato Estrada-Guel I, Miki-Yoshida M, Licea-Jimenez L, Martinez-Sanchez R (2012) Wear behaviour of Al2024–CNTs composites synthesized be mechanical alloying. Wear 292–293:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology. Wiley, New York (problem 2.21) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vettivel SC, Selvakumar N, Narayanswamy R, Leema N (2013) Numerical modelling, prediction of Cu–W nano powder composite in dry sliding wear condition using response surface methodology. Mater Des 50:977–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Box GEP, Wilson KB (1951) On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J R Stat Soc B 13:1–45MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aqida SN, Ghazali MI, Hashim J (2003) The effects of stirring speed and reinforcement particles on porosity formation in cast MMC. J Mech 16:22–30Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rio TG, Rico A, Garrido MA, Poza P, Rodriguez J (2010) Temperature and velocity transitions in dry sliding wear of Al–Li/SiC composites. Wear 268(5–6):700–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dwivedi DK (2004) Sliding temperature and wear behaviour of cast Al–Si–Mg alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 382:328–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rajmohan T, Palanikumar K, Ranganathan S (2013) Evaluation of mechanical and wear properties of hybrid aluminium matrix composites. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 23:2509–2517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Elango G, Raghunath BK (2013) Tribological behaviour of hybrid (LM25 + SiC + TiO2) metal matrix composite. Proc Eng 64:671–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang L, He XB, Qu XH, Duan BH, Lu X, Qin ML (2008) Dry sliding wear properties of high volume fraction SiCp/Cu composites produced by pressure less infiltration. Wear 265:1848–1856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kumar S, Panwar RS, Pandey OP (2013) Effect of dual reinforced ceramic particles on high temperature tribological properties of aluminium composites. Ceram Int 39(6):6333–6342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li XY, Tandon KN (2000) Microstructural characterization of mechanically mixed layer and wear debris in sliding wear of an Al-alloy and an Al-based composite. Wear 245(1–2):148–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Riahi AR, Alpas AT (2001) The role of tribo-layers on the sliding wear behaviour of graphitic aluminium matrix composites. Wear 251:1396–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kumar R, Dhiman S (2013) A study of sliding wear behaviours of Al7075 and Al7075 hybrid composite by response surface methodology analysis. Mater Des 50:351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rajeev VR, Dwivedi DK, Jain S (2009) Effect of experimental parameters on reciprocating wear behaviour of Al–Si–SiCp composites under dry conditions. Tribol Online 4(5):115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gongjun C, Muye N, Shengyu Z, Jun Y, Qinling B (2012) Dry-sliding tribological properties of bronze–graphite composites. Tribol Lett 48:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kumar VGB, Rao CSP, Selvaraj N (2011) Mechanical and tribological behaviour of particulate reinforced aluminium metal matrix composites—a review. J Miner Mater Charact Eng 10:59–91Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kok M (2006) Abrasive wear of Al2O3 particle reinforced 2024 aluminium alloy composites fabricated by vortex method. Compos A 37:457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ma ZY, Liang YN, Zhang YZ, Lu YX, Bi J (1996) Sliding wear behaviour of SiC particle reinforced 2024 aluminium alloy composites. Mater Sci Technol 12:751–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kok M, Ozdin K (2007) Wear resistance of aluminium alloy and its composites reinforced by Al2O3 particles. J Mater Process Technol 183:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Suh NP, Jahanmir S, Flemming JR, Pamies-Teixeira JJ, Saka N (1977) Overview of the delamination theory of wear. Wear 44(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rosenberger MR, Schvezov CE, Forlerer E (2005) Wear of different aluminium matrix composites under conditions that generate a mechanically mixed layer. Wear 259(1–6):590–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PEC University of TechnologyChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations