Advertisement

Current Addiction Reports

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 266–272 | Cite as

Brain Stimulation as a Method for Understanding, Treating, and Preventing Disorders of Indulgent Food Consumption

  • Peter A. HallEmail author
Food Addiction (A Meule, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Food Addiction

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review is intended to describe the role of brain stimulation in knowledge generation, treatment, and prevention of clinical disorders of indulgent eating (e.g., obesity, bulimia, binge eating).

Recent Findings

Although both invasive and non-invasive variants of brain stimulation have been evaluated as treatments for disorders of indulgent eating, only non-invasive variants have been studied extensively. Among these, both repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) have been evaluated in randomized trials; recent findings for both have been promising, but particularly so for a highly efficient variant of rTMS called theta burst stimulation. Laboratory experimental use of brain stimulation continues to provide important foundational knowledge to guide refinements of clinical treatments and—perhaps less intuitively—preventative efforts on the population level.

Summary

Brain stimulation methods show promise in treating several disorders of indulgent eating, although more randomized trials are required. Continued refinements to stimulation methods will yield important new knowledge in the service of both healthcare system-friendly treatment options and population-level preventative efforts.

Keywords

Brain rTMS Obesity Bulimia Eating disorders Binge eating 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Breslin PAS. An evolutionary perspective on food and human taste. Curr Biol CB. 2013;23:R409–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hall PA. Executive-control processes in high-calorie food consumption. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2016;25:91–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mennella JA. Ontogeny of taste preferences: basic biology and implications for health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99:704S–11S.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miyamoto T, Wright G, Amrein H. Nutrient sensors. Curr Biol. 2013;23:R369–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bures J, Bermudez-Rattoni F, Yamamoto T. Conditioned taste aversion: memory of a special kind [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1998 [cited 2018 Dec 11]. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198523475.001.0001/acprof-9780198523475
  6. 6.
    Logue AW. Taste aversion and the generality of the laws of learning. Psychol Bull 19790101. 1979;86:276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wise RA. Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:483–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burke CJ, Tobler PN, Baddeley M, Schultz W. Neural mechanisms of observational learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:14431–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, Danaei G, Lin JK, Paciorek CJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9·1 million participants. Lancet. 2011;377:557–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rouhani MH, Haghighatdoost F, Surkan PJ, Azadbakht L. Associations between dietary energy density and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutrition. 2016;32:1037–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Locke AE, Kahali B, Berndt SI, Justice AE, Pers TH, Day FR, et al. Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature. 2015;518:197–206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Castro DC, Berridge KC. Advances in the neurobiological bases for food “liking” versus “wanting”. Physiol Behav. 2014;136:22–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stice E, Yokum S. Neural vulnerability factors that increase risk for future weight gain. Psychol Bull. 2016;142:447–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nangunoori RK, Tomycz ND, Oh MY, Whiting DM. Deep brain stimulation for obesity: from a theoretical framework to practical application. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:7971460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doucette WT, Khokhar JY, Green AI. Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation in a rat model of binge eating. Transl Psychiatry. 2015;5:e695.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Halpern CH, Tekriwal A, Santollo J, Keating JG, Wolf JA, Daniels D, et al. Amelioration of binge eating by nucleus accumbens shell deep brain stimulation in mice involves D2 receptor modulation. J Neurosci. 2013;33:7122–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van der Plasse G, Schrama R, van SSP, Vanderschuren LJMJ, Westenberg HGM. Deep brain stimulation reveals a dissociation of consummatory and motivated behaviour in the medial and lateral nucleus accumbens shell of the rat. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33455.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang C, Wei N-L, Wang Y, Wang X, Zhang J-G, Zhang K. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell induces anti-obesity effects in obese rats with alteration of dopamine neurotransmission. Neurosci Lett. 2015;589:1–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wei N, Wang Y, Wang X, He Z, Zhang M, Zhang X, et al. The different effects of high-frequency stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell and core on food consumption are possibly associated with different neural responses in the lateral hypothalamic area. Neuroscience. 2015;301:312–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Denys D, Mantione M, Figee M, van den Munckhof P, Koerselman F, Westenberg H, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67:1061–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harat M, Rudaś M, Zieliński P, Birska J, Sokal P. Nucleus accumbens stimulation in pathological obesity. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2016;50:207–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tronnier VM, Rasche D, Thorns V, Alvarez-Fischer D, Münte TF, Zurowski B. Massive weight loss following deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens in a depressed woman. Neurocase. 2018;24:49–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Whiting DM, Tomycz ND, Bailes J, de Jonge L, Lecoultre V, Wilent B, et al. Lateral hypothalamic area deep brain stimulation for refractory obesity: a pilot study with preliminary data on safety, body weight, and energy metabolism. J Neurosurg. 2013;119:56–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oterdoom DLM, van Dijk G, Verhagen MHP, Jiawan VCR, Drost G, Emous M, et al. Therapeutic potential of deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens in morbid obesity. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;45:E10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grossman N, Bono D, Dedic N, Kodandaramaiah SB, Rudenko A, Suk H-J, et al. Noninvasive deep brain stimulation via temporally interfering electric fields. Cell. 2017;169:1029–1041.e16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gunduz A, Okun MS. A new non-surgical approach for deep-brain stimulation. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:e1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hall PA, Lowe CJ. Cravings, currents and cadavers: what is the magnitude of tDCS effects on food craving outcomes? Nutr Neurosci. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2018.1513678.
  28. 28.
    Berlim MT, van den Eynde F, Tovar-Perdomo S, Daskalakis ZJ. Response, remission and drop-out rates following high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials. Psychol Med. 2014;44:225–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    • Dunlop K, Hanlon CA, Downar J. Noninvasive brain stimulation treatments for addiction and major depression. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017;1394:31–54 Describes the primary clinical research applications of non-invasive brain stimulation protocols in psychiatric populations.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hall PA, Vincent CM, Burhan AM. Non-invasive brain stimulation for food cravings, consumption, and disorders of eating: a review of methods, findings and controversies. Appetite. 2018;124:78–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jansen JM, Daams JG, Koeter MWJ, Veltman DJ, van den Brink W, Goudriaan AE. Effects of non-invasive neurostimulation on craving: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:2472–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    • Kim S-H, Chung J-H, Kim T-H, Lim SH, Kim Y, Lee Y-A, et al. The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on eating behaviors and body weight in obesity: a randomized controlled study. Brain Stimulat. 2018;11:528–35 This paper describes the findings of a randomized trial examining the effects of rTMS on eating and weight outcomes in overweight adults. It is the first study to examine theta burst variant of rTMS for this purpose. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Baczynski TP, de Aquino Chaim CH, Nazar BP, Carta MG, Arias-Carrion O, Silva AC, et al. High-frequency rTMS to treat refractory binge eating disorder and comorbid depression: a case report. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2014;13:771–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Guillaume S, Gay A, Jaussent I, Sigaud T, Billard S, Attal J, et al. Improving decision-making and cognitive impulse control in bulimia nervosa by rTMS: an ancillary randomized controlled study. Int J Eat Disord. 2018;51:1103–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Uher R, Yoganathan D, Mogg A, Eranti SV, Treasure J, Campbell IC, et al. Effect of left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on food craving. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;58:840–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Van den Eynde F, Claudino AM, Mogg A, Horrell L, Stahl D, Ribeiro W, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces cue-induced food craving in bulimic disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;67:793–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    • Hanlon CA, Philip NS, Price RB, Bickel WK, Downar J. A case for the frontal pole as an empirically derived neuromodulation treatment target. 2019;85(3):e13–14. Describes the rationale for the frontal pole as a novel stimulation target for rTMS protocols. Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hanlon CA, Dowdle LT, Correia B, Mithoefer O, Kearney-Ramos T, Lench D, et al. Left frontal pole theta burst stimulation decreases orbitofrontal and insula activity in cocaine users and alcohol users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;178:310–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cooper Z, Doll HA, Hawker DM, Byrne S, Bonner G, Eeley E, et al. Testing a new cognitive behavioural treatment for obesity: a randomized controlled trial with three-year follow-up. Behav Res Ther. 2010;48:706–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stillman CM, Erickson KI. Physical activity as a model for health neuroscience. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1428:103–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Miyake A, Friedman NP. The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: four general conclusions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21:8–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yuan P, Raz N. Prefrontal cortex and executive functions in healthy adults: a meta-analysis of structural neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;42:180–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lowe CJ, Kolev D, Hall PA. An exploration of exercise-induced cognitive enhancement and transfer effects to dietary self-control. Brain Cogn. 2016;110:102–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Huang Y-Z, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 2005;45:201–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Huang Y-Z, Rothwell JC, Chen R-S, Lu C-S, Chuang W-L. The theoretical model of theta burst form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122:1011–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lowe CJ, Manocchio F, Safati AB, Hall PA. The effects of theta burst stimulation (TBS) targeting the prefrontal cortex on executive functioning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia. 2018;111:344–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Suppa A, Huang Y-Z, Funke K, Ridding MC, Cheeran B, Di Lazzaro V, et al. Ten years of Theta burst stimulation in humans: established knowledge, unknowns and prospects. Brain Stimulat. 2016;9:323–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    • Lowe CJ, Staines WR, Manocchio F, Hall PA. The neurocognitive mechanisms underlying food cravings and snack food consumption. A combined continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) and EEG study. NeuroImage. 2018;177:45–58 Identifies the dlPFC as an important node in modulation of food craving and consumption, and provides mediational analyses for observed effects. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lowe CJ, Hall PA, Staines WR. The effects of continuous Theta burst stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on executive function, food cravings, and snack food consumption. Psychosom Med. 2014;76:503–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Miller EK, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gollwitzer PM. The goal concept: a helpful tool for theory development and testing in motivation science. Motiv Sci. 2018;4:185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Prestwich A, Sheeran P, Webb T, Gollwitzer P. Implementation intentions. Predict Chang Health Behav Res Pract Soc Cogn Models. New York: McGraw Hill Education; 2015. p. 321–57.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Stadler G, Oettingen G, Gollwitzer PM. Intervention effects of information and self-regulation on eating fruits and vegetables over two years. Health Psychol Off J Div Health Psychol Am Psychol Assoc. 2010;29:274–83.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hall PA, Zehr CE, Ng M, Zanna MP. Implementation intentions for physical activity in supportive and unsupportive environmental conditions: an experimental examination of intention–behavior consistency. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2012;48:432–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Loy LS, Wieber F, Gollwitzer PM, Oettingen G. Supporting Sustainable Food Consumption: Mental Contrasting with Implementation Intentions (MCII) aligns intentions and behavior. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Dec 11];7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850472/
  56. 56.
    Schweiger Gallo I, Cohen A-L, Gollwitzer PM, Oettingen G. Neurophysiological correlates of the self-regulation of goal pursuit. In: Hall PA, editor. Soc Neurosci Public Health Found Sci Chronic Dis Prev [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2013. p. 19–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6852-3_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lowe CJ, Safati A, Hall PA. The neurocognitive consequences of sleep restriction: a meta-analytic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;80:586–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    McEwen BS, Bowles NP, Gray JD, Hill MN, Hunter RG, Karatsoreos IN, et al. Mechanisms of stress in the brain. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:1353–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lowe CJ, Reichelt AC, Hall PA. The Prefrontal Cortex and Obesity: A Health Neuroscience Perspective. Trends in Cog Sci. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.005.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Prevention Neuroscience Laboratory, School of Public Health and Health SystemsUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations