Advertisement

Invasion of Egeria densa Planch. in semiarid reservoirs

  • Julia Brito Lacet
  • Ariadne do Nascimento Moura
  • Ênio Wocyli DantasEmail author
Original Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to relate the vegetation cover of Egeria densa to climatic, limnological and diversity variables to gain an understanding of how they affect occurrence and colonization of the macrophyte. This study was conducted in six reservoirs of the Paraíba do Norte River Basin. Six sampling units were established in each reservoir, and the occurrence of vegetation cover of the aquatic plant was verified at three-month intervals. The occurrence was evaluated based on the occurrence of E. densa, and the establishment phase was evaluated based on vegetation cover. The macrophyte was found in three reservoirs and exhibited invasive behavior in two of them. PERMANOVA and logistic regression analyses were performed to understand the occurrence of the species. Precipitation, total dissolved solids and richness were evidenced as the significant variables. PERMANOVA and generalized linear models were used to evaluate the colonization, indicating that precipitation and temperature were determinant factors of the invasion of E. densa. The model generated for occurrence was robust and had a 4.3-fold higher explanatory power than the model of colonization. Results revealed that occurrence is the most important aspect for the successful invasion of E. densa and, once present in an environment, its colonization is probable.

Keywords

Aquatic macrophytes Colonization Invasive species Occurrence Plant cover 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding for this work was provided by FINEP—Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos, through the Project REHISA—Rede Hidrográfica do Semiárido, coordinated by José Etham de Lucena Barbosa (Grant No. 1107/13). We also thank the support of CNPQ—Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, and the Postgraduate Program in Botany of UFRPE—Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco.

Author contributions

JBL was responsible for collecting, processing and analyzing data, as well as writing the text. ANM worked on data analysis and revision of the text. EWD participated in the project planning, data analysis and review of the text.

References

  1. Alpert P, Bone E, Holzapel C (2000) Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspect Plant Ecol 3:52–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Gonçalves JLM, Sparovek G (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Z 22:711–728.  https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APG IV (2016) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot J Linn Soc 181:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. APHA, Awwa, WPCF (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste-water. APHA/AWWA/WPCF, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Azevêdo DJS, Barbosa JEL, Porto DE, Gomes WIA, Molozzi J (2015) Diversity measures in macroinvertebrate and zooplankton communities related to the trophic status of subtropical reservoirs: contradictory or complementary responses? Ecol Indic 50:135–149.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S2179-975X2914 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azzurro E, Golani D, Bucciarelli G, Bernardi G (2006) Genetics of the early stages of invasion of the Lessepsian rabbitfish Siganus luridus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 333:190–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2005.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bezerra TP, Silva CP, Lopes JP (2007) Utilização da macrófita aquática Egeria densa Planchon, 1849 (Hydrocharitacea) na produção de tijolos para construção civil. Rev Bras Eng Pesca 2:114–127Google Scholar
  8. Braun-Blanquet J (1979) Fitossociologia: bases para el estúdio de las comunidades vegetales. Blume, MadridGoogle Scholar
  9. Canfield DE, Shireman JV Jr, Colle DE, Haller WT, Watkins IICE, Maceina MJ (1984) Prediction of chlorophylla concentrations in Florida lakes: importance of aquatic macrophytes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 41:497–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casati P, Lara MV, Andreo CS (2002) Regulation of enzymes involved in C4 photosynthesis and the antioxidant metabolism by UV-B radiation in Egeria densa, a submersed aquatic species. Photosynth Res 71:251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costa DF, Barbosa JEL, Dantas EW (2016) Productivity-diversity relationships in reservoir phytoplankton communities in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil. J Arid Environ 129:64–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Durand J, Fleenor W, McElreath R, Santos MJ, Moyle P (2016) Physical Controls on the Distribution of the Submersed Aquatic Weed Egeria densa in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Implications for Habitat Restoration. San Franc Estuary Watershed Sci 14:2–20.  https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2016v14iss1art4 Google Scholar
  13. Fominykh AS, Mukhutdinov VF, Kipriyanov LM (2016) Findings of Brazilian Elodea in Cooling Ponds of the Verkhnii Tagil Power Plant (Middle Urals). Russ J Biol Invasions 7:189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gillard M, Grewell BJ, Deleu C, Thiébaut G (2017) Climate warming and water primroses: germination responses of populations from two invaded ranges. Aquat Bot 136:155–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2016.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horst JL, Kimball S, Becerra JX, Noge K, Venable DL (2014) Documenting the early stages of invasion of Matthiola parviflora and predicting its spread in North America. Southwest Nat 59:47–55.  https://doi.org/10.1894/F07-FMO-13.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kosten S, Jeppesen E, Huszar VLM, Mazzeo V, Nes E, Peeters ETHM, Scheffer M (2011) Ambiguous climate impacts on competition between submerged macrophytes and phytoplankton in shallow lakes. Freshw Biol 56:1540–1553.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02593.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Medeiros PRP, Cavalcante Segundo GH, Magalhães EMM (2015) Comportamento da turbidez e material em suspensão, em um rio com vazão regularizada por sistema de barragens em cascata: Rio São Francisco (NE, Brasil). Geochim Bras 29:35–44.  https://doi.org/10.5327/Z0102-9800201500010004 Google Scholar
  18. Mori ES, Martins D, Velini ED, Marino CL, Gouvêa CF, Leite SMM, Camacho E, Guries RP (2012) Genetic diversity in Egeria densa and E. najas in Jupiá Reservoir, Brazil. Cien Inv Agric 39:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moro MF, Sousa DJL, Matias LQ (2014) Rarefaction, richness estimation and extrapolation methods in the evaluation of unseen plant diversity in aquatic ecosystems. Aquat Bot 117:44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nascimento PRF, Pereira SMB, Sampaio EVSB (2008) Biomassa de Egeria Densa nos Reservatórios da Hidroelétrica de Paulo Afonso-Bahia. Planta Daninha 26:481–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oliveira NMB, Sampaio EVSB, Pereira SMB, Moura-Júnior AM (2005) Capacidade de regeneração de Egeria densa nos reservatórios de Paulo Afonso, BA. Planta Daninha 23:363–369Google Scholar
  22. Pereira SMB, Nascimento PRF, Sampaio EVSB, Carvalho MFO, Moura-Júnior AM (2008) Monitoramento e manejo da macrófita aquática Egeria densa Planchon no nordeste brasileiro. Estudo de Caso. In: Moura AN, Araújo EL, Albuquerque UP (eds) Biodiversidade, Potencial econômico e Processos Eco-fisiológicos em Ecossistemas Nordestinos. Nupeea, Recife, pp 209–234Google Scholar
  23. Rai PK (2015) Concept of plant invasion Ecology as Prime Factor for Biodiversity Crisis: introductory review. Int Res J Environ Sci 4:85–90Google Scholar
  24. Redekop P, Hofstra D, Hussner A (2016) Elodea canadensis shows a higher dispersal capacity via fragmentation than Egeria densa and Lagarosiphon major. Aquat Bot 130:45–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2016.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ribas LGs, Cássia-Silva C, Petsch DK, Silveira MJ, Lima-Ribeiro MS (2018) The potential invasiveness of an aquatic macrophyte reflects founder effects from native niche. Biol Invasions 20:3347–3355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1780-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Riis T, Lambertini C, Olesen B, Clayton JS, Brix H, Sorrel BK (2010) Invasion strategies in clonal aquatic plants: are phenotypic differences caused by phenotypic plasticity or local adaptation? Ann Bot 106:813–822.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sabino JHF, Araújo ES, Cotarelli VM, Siqueira Filho JA, Campelo MJA (2015) Riqueza, composição florística, estrutura e formas biológicas de macrófitas aquáticas em reservatórios do semiárido nordestino, Brasil. Nat Online 13:184–194Google Scholar
  28. Santos E, Gomes SO, Lopes JP (2006) Contribuição de elódea Egeria Densa à piscicultura através da colonização do camarão-canela Macrobrachium Amazonicum no Sub-Médio Rio São Francisco, no nordeste do Brasil. Rev Bras Eng Pesca 1:102–118Google Scholar
  29. Silva AEP, Angelis CF, Machado LAT, Waichaman AV (2008) Influência da precipitação na qualidade da água do Rio Purus. Acta Amazon 38:733–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stiers I, Crohain N, Josens G, Triest L (2011) Impact of three aquatic invasive species on native plants and macroinvertebrates in temperate ponds. Biol Invasions 13:2715–2726.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-9942-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tanner CC, Clayton JS, Wells RDS (1993) Effects of suspended solids on the establishment and growth of Egeria densa. Aquat Bot 45:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Theoharides KA, Dukes JS (2007) Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol 176:256–273.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02207.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thiébaut G, Martinez L (2015) An exotic macrophyte bed may facilitate the anchorage of exotic propagules during the first stage of invasion. Hydrobiologia 746:183–196.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-1982-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thiébaut G, Gillard M, Deleu C (2016) Growth, regeneration and colonization of Egeria densa fragments: the effect of autumn temperature increases. Aquat Ecol 50:175–185.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-016-9566-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wetzel RG, Likens GE (2000) Limnological analyses. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Williamson M (2006) Explaining and predicting the success of invading species at different stages of invasion. Biol Invasions 8:1561–1568.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-5849-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yarrow M, Marín VH, Finlayson M, Tironi A, Delgado LE, Fischer F (2009) The ecology of Egeria densa Planchon (Liliopsida: Alismatales): A wetland ecosystem engineer? Rev Chil Hist Nat 82:299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Botanical Society of Sao Paulo 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Programa de Pós-graduação em BotânicaUniversidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco-UFRPERecifeBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Biologia, BotânicaUniversidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco-UFRPERecifeBrazil
  3. 3.Centro de Ciências Biológicas e Sociais Aplicadas-CCBSA, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Campus VUniversidade Estadual da Paraíba-UEPBJoão PessoaBrazil

Personalised recommendations