Advertisement

Ectopic eruption of the second premolar: an analysis of four different treatment approaches

  • M. Q. Ismail
  • E. Lauridsen
  • J. O. Andreasen
  • N. V. HermannEmail author
Original Scientific Article

Abstract

Purpose

Ectopic second premolars may lead to impaction and loss of space in the jaws, and in rare cases even to resorption of the first permanent molar. The aim of this study was to analyse different treatment strategies of ectopic second premolars and if possible give guidelines on when to favour different treatment approaches.

Materials and methods

The study was a retrospective, non-randomised, outcome analysis of treatment on 41 ectopic second premolars in 37 patients (24 females and 13 males). In all cases oral examination, radiographs (pre-, peri-, and post) and full medical history were obtained. The treatment options included: (a) spontaneous eruption, (b) spontaneous eruption + extraction of primary tooth, (c) surgical exposure, (d) surgical uprighting, and (e) surgical uprighting + orthodontic extrusion. For evaluation each tooth was scored according to: (1) stage of root development, (2) distance between edges of the premolar and first permanent molar, (3) depth of impaction, (4) inclination, (5) horizontal position of the tooth. The level of significance was set to 5%.

Results

Only mild cases of ectopic second premolars are self-correcting. Based on the position of the tooth in the jaw different treatment options may be chosen, these may include: extraction of primary predecessor (impaction depth < 5 mm, inclination < 55°), surgical exposure of tooth germ (impaction depth < 5.5 mm, inclination < 95°) or surgical uprighting (impaction depth > 5.5 mm with no inclination limit).

Conclusion

If there is no sign of self-correction after a short observation period, it is important to consider active treatment to help guiding the tooth into the correct eruption pathway.

Keywords

Ectopy Impaction Eruption Second premolar Surgical exposure Surgical uprighting 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no disclosures.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Andreasen JO. Atlas of replantation and transplantation of teeth. Fribourg: Mediglobe; 1992.Google Scholar
  2. Andreasen JO, Kølsen Petersen J, Laskin DM. Textbook and color atlas of tooth impactions: diagnosis, treatment, prevention. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1997.Google Scholar
  3. Andreasen JO, Paulsen HU, Yu Z, et al. A long-term study of 370 autotransplanted premolars. Part I. Surgical procedures and standardized techniques for monitoring healing. Eur J Orthod. 1990a;12:3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreasen JO, Paulsen HU, Yu Z, et al. A long-term study of 370 autotransplanted premolars. Part IV. Root development subsequent to transplantation. Eur J Orthod. 1990b;12:38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andreasen JO, Paulsen HU, Yu Z, et al. A long-term study of 370 autotransplanted premolars. Part II. Tooth survival and pulp healing subsequent to transplantation. Eur J Orthod. 1990c;12:14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andreasen JO, Paulsen HU, Yu Z, et al. A long-term study of 370 autotransplanted premolars. Part III. Periodontal healing subsequent to transplantation. Eur J Orthod. 1990d;12:25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azaz B, Steiman Z, Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E, et al. The sequelae of surgical exposure of unerupted teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980;38:121–7.Google Scholar
  8. Becker A. Orthodontic treatment of impacted teeth. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burch J, Ngan P, Hackman A. Diagnosis and treatment planning for unerupted premolars. Pediatr Dent. 1994;16:89–95.Google Scholar
  10. Cahill DR, Marks SC Jr. Tooth eruption: evidence for the central role of the dental follicle. J Oral Pathol. 1980;9:189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferreira DCA, Fumes AC, Consolaro A, et al. Gubernacular cord and canal: does these anatomical structures play a role in dental eruption? RSBO. 2013;10:167–71.Google Scholar
  12. Frank CA. Treatment options for impacted teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:623–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu JR, Nakasima A, Takahama Y. Familial similarity in dental arch form and tooth position. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1992;12:33–40.Google Scholar
  14. Kjaer I. Mechanism of human tooth eruption: review article including a new theory for future studies on the eruption process. Scientifica. 2014;2014:341905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marks SC Jr, Schroeder HE. Tooth eruption: theories and facts. Anat Record. 1996;245:374–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moorrees CF, Fanning EA, Hunt EE Jr. Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res. 1963;42:1490–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mossey PA. The heritability of malocclusion: part 2. The influence of genetics in malocclusion. Br J Orthod. 1999;26:195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mugonzibwa EA, Eskeli R, Laine-Alava MT, et al. Spacing and crowding among African and Caucasian children. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11:82–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ten Nanci A. Cate’s oral histology: development, structure, and function. 9th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2017.Google Scholar
  20. Nordenram A, Stromberg C. Positional relationships of the retained premolar. A clinical-radiological study of an oral surgical case material. Acta Odontol Scand. 1968;26:177–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Öhman I, Öhman A. The eruption tendency and changes of direction of impacted teeth following surgical exposure. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980;49:383–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Omnell L, Sipher D. Root resorption in association with ectopic eruption: report of case. ASDC J Dent Child. 1987;54:361–2.Google Scholar
  23. Pocock SJ. The simplest statistical test: how to check for a difference between treatments. Br Med J. 2006;332:1256–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raghoebar GM, Boering G, Vissink A, et al. Eruption disturbances of permanent molars: a review. J Oral Pathol Med. 1991;20:159–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shah RM, Boyd MA, Vakil TF. Studies of permanent tooth anomalies in 7886 Canadian individuals. I: impacted teeth. Dent J. 1978;44:262–4.Google Scholar
  26. Shifman A, Chanannel I. Prevalence of taurodontism found in radiographic dental examination of 1200 young adult Israeli patients. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1978;6:200–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Spyropoulos ND. Orientation and eruptive patterns of the mandibular second premolar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;69:642–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Decker E, Meyer-Marcotty P, et al. Primary Failure of Eruption (PFE)—Clinical and Molecular Genetics Analysis. J Orofac Orthop Fortschritte Kieferorthopädie. 2010;71:6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stemm RM. The frequency of malposed unerupted lower premolar teeth. Angle Orthodon. 1971;41:157–8.Google Scholar
  30. Thilander B, Myrberg N. The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren. Scand J Dent Res. 1973;81:12–21.Google Scholar
  31. Thilander H, Thilander B, Persson G. Treatment of impacted teeth by surgical exposure. A survey study. Swed Dent J. 1973;66:519–25.Google Scholar
  32. Tracey C, Lee RT. Root resorption: the aggressive, unerupted second premolar. Br J Orthod. 1985;12:97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wasserstein A, Brezniak N, Shalish M, et al. Angular changes and their rates in concurrence to developmental stages of the mandibular second premolar. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:332–6.Google Scholar
  34. Wise GE. Cellular and molecular basis of tooth eruption. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009;12:67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Clinical Genetics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen NDenmark
  2. 2.Resource Centre for Rare Oral DiseasesCopenhagen University Hospital RigshospitaletCopenhagen ØDenmark

Personalised recommendations