Advertisement

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the efficacy of sodium hypochlorite as a haemostatic agent compared with physiologic saline on the success of calcium hydroxide pulpotomies in primary molars: an in vivo study

  • Hemavathi
  • J. Nagarathna
  • S. K. Srinath
  • M. C. Hiremath
Original Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate, via clinical and radiographic assessment; the success of calcium hydroxide pulpotomies with the application of 5% sodium hypochlorite as a haemostatic agent compared with physiologic saline in primary molars and to evaluate if there is improved efficacy of increased concentration of sodium hypochlorite application in calcium hydroxide pulpotomies.

Methods

Thirty children aged between 3 and 8 years, having at least two vital primary molars (split mouth design) with deep carious lesions with probable exposure of the pulp, were selected. The 60 teeth were randomly allocated to two groups and conventional calcium hydroxide pulpotomies were performed on all selected primary molars in both the groups. A cotton pellet saturated with 5% sodium hypochlorite was applied to teeth as a haemostatic agent in group A (experimental) for 30 s while physiologic saline was used to manage haemorrhage in group B (control). Teeth were restored with preformed metal crowns (PMC) in both the groups after the procedure. Evaluation for clinical and radiological success of calcium hydroxide pulpotomies was performed at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up.

Results

Statistical analysis did not show (p > 0.05) significant differences in the clinical and radiological success rates of calcium hydroxide pulpotomies in both the groups at 12 months follow-up.

Conclusion

The increased concentration of sodium hypochlorite showed lower success rate in calcium hydroxide pulpotomies when compared to physiologic saline, although this difference was not statistically significant.

Keywords

Sodium hypochlorite Calcium hydroxide Saline Haemorrhage Pulpotomy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special regards to participated children in this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and /or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

References

  1. Accorinte MLR, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Muench A, Araujo VC. Response of human pulp capped with a bonding agent after bleeding control with haemostatic agents. Oper Dent. 2005;30(2):147–55.Google Scholar
  2. Accorinte MLR, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Holland R. Effects of hemostatic agents on the histomorphologic response of human dental pulp capped with calcium hydroxide. Quintessence Int. 2007;38(10):843–52.Google Scholar
  3. Akcay M. Sari S. The effect of sodium hypochlorite application on the success of calcium hydroxide and mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomies in primary teeth. Paediatr Dent. 2014;36(4):316–21.Google Scholar
  4. Andersen M, Lund A, Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. In vitro solubility of human pulp tissue in calcium hydroxide and sodium hypochlorite. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1992;8:104–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox CF, Subay RK, Ostro E, Suzuki S, Suzuki SH. Tunnel defects in dentin bridges: their formation following direct pulp capping. Oper Dent. 1996;21(1):4–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Doyle WA, McDonald RE, Mitchell DF. Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide in pulpotomy. J Dent Child. 1962;29:86–97.Google Scholar
  7. Fava LRG, Saunders WP. Calcium hydroxide pastes: classification and clinical indications. Int Endod J. 1999;32:257–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gruythuysen RJ, Weerheijim KL. Calcium hydroxide pulpotomy with a light-cured cavity sealing material after two years. ASDC J Dent Child. 1997;64(4):251–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hafez AA, Charles F. Cox CF, et al. An in vivo evaluation of hemorrhage control using sodium hypochlorite and direct capping with a one-or-two-component adhesive system in exposed non-human primate pulps. Quintessence Int. 2002;33(4):261–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Heggers JP, Sazy JA, Stenberg BD. Bactericidal and wound healing properties of sodium hypochlorite solutions. J Burn Care Rehab. 1991;12:420–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heilig J, Yates J, Siskin M, McKnight J, Turner J. Calcium hydroxide pulpotomy for primary teeth: a clinical study. J Amdent Assoc. 1984;108:775–8.  https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archieve.1984.0049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holan C, Fuks AB, Ketlz N. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalgam. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:212–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Huth KC, Paschos E. Folwaczny M, Hajek-Al-Khatar N. Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques—randomized control trial. J Dent Res. 2005;84(12):1144–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar PNH, Nayak R, Bhaskar VK, Mopkar PP. Pulpotomy medicaments: continued search for new alternatives—a review. OHDM. 2014;13(4):883–90.Google Scholar
  15. Li T-Y, Chuang L-C, Tsai AI. A retrospective study of sodium hypochlorite pulpotomies in primary molars. J Dent Sci 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1016/i.jds.2016.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu H, Zhou Q, Qin M. Mineral trioxide aggregate versus calcium hydroxide for pulpotomy in primary molars. Chin J Dent Res. 2011;14(2):121–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Magnusson B (1970) Therapeutic pulpotomy in primary molars—clinical and histological follow-up. I. Calcium hydroxide paste as a wound dressing. Odontol Revy 21:415–431PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Markovic D, Zivojinovic V, Vucetic M. Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2005;6(3):133–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mohammadi Z, Dummer PMH. Properties and applications of calcium hydroxide in endodontics and dental traumatology. Int Endod J. 2011;44(8):697–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Percinoto C, de Castro AM, Pinto LM (2006) Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies employing calcium hydroxide and trioxide mineral aggregate. Gen Dent 54(4):258–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ranly DM. Pulpotomy therapy in primary teeth: New modalities for old rationales. Pediatr Dent. 1994;16:403–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ravi GR, Subramanyam RV. Calcium hydroxide-induced resorption of deciduous teeth: a possible explanation. Dent Hypotheses. 2012;3(3):90–4.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2155-8213.103910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosenfeld EF, James GA, Burch BS. Vital pulp tissue response to sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 1978;5:140-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/50099-2399(78)80129-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ruby JD, Cox CF, Mitchell SC et al. A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013;23:145–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schroder U (1978) A 2-year follow-up of primary molars, pulpotomized with a gentle technique and capped with calcium hydroxide. Eur J Oral Sci 86:273–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Silva AF, Tarquinio SBC, Demarco FF, Piva E, Rivero ERC. The influence of haemostatic agents on healing of healthy human dental pulp tissue capped with calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J. 2006;39(4):309–16.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tunc ES, Saroglu I, Sari S, Gunhan O. The effect of sodium hypochlorite application on the success of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102(2):22–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vargas KG, Packham B, Lowman D. Preliminary evaluation of sodium hypochlorite for pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2006;28(6):511–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vostatek SF, Kanellis MJ, Weber-Gasparoni K, Gregorsok RL. Sodium hypochlorite pulpotomies in primary teeth: a retrospective assessment. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33(4):327–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Waterhouse PJ, Nunn JH, Whitworth JM. An investigation of the relative efficacy of Buckley’s Formocresol and calcium hydroxide in primary molar vital pulp therapy. Br Dent J. 2000;188(1):32–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Yildiz E, Tosun G. Evaluation of formocresol, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulphate, and MTA primary molar pulpotomies. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(2):234–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hemavathi
    • 1
  • J. Nagarathna
    • 1
  • S. K. Srinath
    • 1
  • M. C. Hiremath
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Paedodontics and Preventive DentistryGovernment Dental College and Research InstituteBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations