In vitro comparison between apex locators, direct and radiographic techniques for determining the root canal length in primary teeth
- 89 Downloads
To compare the accuracy of three electronic apex locators in the measurement of the root length of primary teeth with the radiographic and direct visual techniques.
The sample of the in vitro study was 102 root canals of primary molars. For the direct visual technique, the root canal file was introduced into the canal until its tip passed the apical foramen, then it was moved back to the limit of the foramen or root resorption and the measurement was made with a millimetre ruler. For the radiographic measurement, a calibrated and blinded researcher (κ > 0.87) measured the root canals using the same rule. Measurements with apex locators were performed by inserting the file into the canal until the word “Apex” or audible warning to indicate the foramen or resorption. For data analysis, one-way ANOVA for repeated measurements and the Sidak post hoc tests were performed.
The direct measurement (µ = 8.57) did not present statistical difference when compared to the Root ZX II measurement (µ = 8.45), as opposed to the radiographic measurements (µ = 8.12), the Endus (µ = 8.24) and iPex II (µ = 8.29).
The use of apex locators was superior to the radiographic method and the Root ZX II was the most effective.
KeywordsIn vitro techniques Endodontics Primary teeth Root canal therapy Root canal preparation
The authors are grateful to the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for financial support (finance code: 001).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this study.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Process no. 2572237) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Ahmed HM. Anatomical challenges, electronic working length determination and current developments in root canal preparation of primary molar teeth. Int Endod J. 2013;46(11):1011–22.Google Scholar
- Borges MMB, Guimarães BM, Alves JD, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of two apex locators in apical limit: an in vitro study. Rev Odontol Bras Central. 2016;25(74):126–9.Google Scholar
- Kumar LV, Sreelakshmi N, Reddy ER, et al. Clinical evaluation of conventional radiography, radiovisiography, and an electronic apex locator in determining the working length in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38(1):37–41.Google Scholar
- Navit S, Jaiswal N, Khan SA, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of contemporary obturating materials used in primary teeth—an in-vitro study. journal of clinical and diagnostic research. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(9):ZC09–12.Google Scholar
- Parisay I, Ghoddusi J, Forghanib M. A review on vital pulp therapy in primary teeth. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(1):6–15.Google Scholar
- Patiño-Marín N, Zavala-Alonso NV, Martínez-Castañón GA, et al. Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of conventional radiography and apex locators in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33(1):19–22.Google Scholar