A study of parental presence/absence technique for child dental behaviour management
- 269 Downloads
To examine the effectiveness of parental presence/absence (PPA) technique on the dental behaviour management of children.
Materials and methods
This randomised control study recruited 61 child dental patients with uncooperative behaviour (Frankl 1 or 2) managed with AAPD-endorsed non-pharmacological techniques at a post-graduate university clinic. PPA was only used in the test group (31 children). Using a mini video-tape device, recording commenced at the onset of uncooperative behaviour and this was later rated, minute by minute, by a blinded experienced paediatric dentist.
Data were analysed with SPSS v.13.0. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used for normality analysis. The Mann–Whitney U-test and Log Rank analysis were also performed.
The mean point in time, after behavioural problems commenced that PPA or alternatives were applied was 1.82 ± 1.04 min. Behaviour improvement (technique success) was shown by 65.6% of all children. There was no statistically significant difference between the study and control groups in age, gender, mean Frankl score, in Frankl score 2 min before/after technique application or regarding the time point at which the technique was first applied. Behaviour improvement was seen in 17 patients (54.8%) in the PPA group and in 23 patients (76.7%) in the control group.
PPA applied to various dental sessions as a behaviour management technique showed no advantage over other basic, non-pharmacological techniques.
KeywordsDental fear Child behaviour Management technique Parental presence
I would like to thank Dr. Angelos V. Vasiliadis for his contribution to the statistical analysis.
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was not funded.
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Ethics Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
- Frankl SN, Shiere FR, Fogels HR. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory. J Dent Child. 1962;29(1):150–63.Google Scholar
- Goepferd SJ, Garcia-Godoy F. Preventive oral health in early childhood. In: Harris NO, Garcia-Godoy F, editors. Primary preventive dentistry. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson; 2004. p. 501–16.Google Scholar
- Guideline on Behavior Guidance for the Pediatric Dental Patient. Clinical Guidelines, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. www.aapd.org. Accessed at 06 Nov 2016.
- Klingberg G, Berggren U, Noren JG. Dental fear in an urban Swedish population: prevalence and concomitant factors. Commun Dent Health. 1994;11:208–14.Google Scholar
- Kotsanos N, Arhakis A, Coolidge T. Parental presence versus absence in the dental operatory: a technique to manage the uncooperative child dental patient. Eur J Paed Dent. 2005;3:144–8.Google Scholar
- Rayman MS. Parent observation. Calif Dent Assoc J. 1987;15:20–4.Google Scholar
- Townsend JA. Behavior guidance of the pediatric dental patient. In: Casamassimo PS, Fields HW, McTigue DJ, Nowak AJ, editors. Pediatric dentistry. Infancy through adolescence, Ch. 23. 5th ed. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2013.Google Scholar