Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 119–121 | Cite as

Ingestion of a RPE activation key: Why do these accidents still happen?

  • M. C. G. PantuzoEmail author
  • E. Nunes
  • L. R. Pires
  • L. S. da M. C. Pinto
  • D. D. Oliveira
Short Communication

Abstract

Aim

To draw attention and increase professional awareness about the potentially serious complications that may occur when these misfortunes happen and to what actions could be implemented to avoid such accidents.

Methods

The present case report is of an accidental ingestion of a rapid maxillary expander (RPE) activation key in a cardiac patient and the subsequent diagnostic confirmation with radiographs and the management of this accident thereafter.

Results

On the third day after the accidental ingestion of the RPE key, the patient’s parents reported that the key was expelled in the stools without further complication.

Conclusions

Ingestion of foreign bodies is a potential complication during orthodontic treatment. These types of accidents may cause serious consequences to the patient, especially if there is a pre-existing systemic condition, such as heart disease or respiratory problems.

Keywords

Ingestion Foreign bodies Orthodontic treatment Maxillary expansion Child 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Allwork JJ, Edwards IR, Welch IM. Ingestion of a quadhelix appliance requiring surgical removal: a case report. J Orthod. 2007;34:154–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashraf O. Foreign body in the esophagus: a review. São Paulo Med J. 2006;124:346–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng W, Tam PK. Foreign-body ingestion in children: experience with 1,265 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34:1472–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dibiase AT, Samuels RH, Ozdiler E, Akcam MO, Turkkahraman H. Hazards of orthodontics appliances and the oropharynx. J Orthod. 2000;27:295–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hass AJ. Long-term posttreatment evaluation of rapid palatal expasion. Angle Orthod. 1980;50(3):189–217.Google Scholar
  6. Keles A. Keles keyless expander: a new approach for rapid palatal expansion. World J Orthod. 2008;9:407–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Monini Ada C, Maia LG, Jacob HB, Gandini LG Jr. Accidental swallowing of orthodontic expansion appliance key. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;140(2):266–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Naragond A, Kenganal S, Rajasigamani K, Kumar NS. Accidental ingestion of molar band and its management: maintenance is better than management. Case Rep Dent. 2013;2013:891304.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Nazif MM, Ready MA. Accidental swallowing of orthodontic expansion appliance keys: report of two cases. ASDC J Dent Child. 1983;50:126–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith MO, Wong RKH. Foreign bodies. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007;17:361–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tiwana KK, Morton T, Tiwana PS. Aspirations and ingestion in dental practice: a 10-year institutional review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:1287–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. C. G. Pantuzo
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. Nunes
    • 1
  • L. R. Pires
    • 1
  • L. S. da M. C. Pinto
    • 1
  • D. D. Oliveira
    • 2
  1. 1.School of DentistryPontifical Catholic University of Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  2. 2.Department of OrthodonticsPontifical Catholic University of Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations