Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 489–494 | Cite as

Immediate and mediate furcal perforation treatment in primary molars: 24-month follow-up

  • N. C. T. Marques
  • N. Lourenço Neto
  • T. M. OliveiraEmail author
Case Report

Abstract

Background

Furcal perforation consists of a communication between the pulp cavity and the periodontal tissues that can occur accidentally during cavity preparation or root canal instrumentation. This complication may lead to inflammatory reactions and compromise adjacent tissues irreversibly, resulting in the early loss of primary teeth. Perforation sealing with a biocompatible material is necessary to ensure a favourable prognosis. Among different materials, MTA has been employed due to its excellent healing and physical properties.

Case report

The purpose of these case reports was to describe immediate and mediate cases of furcal perforation treatment using MTA in primary molars. In both the cases, after accidental perforation detection, the pulp chamber was cleaned with saline solution to clear off the debris. The wound surface was continuously irrigated with saline solution and a dry sterile cotton pellet was placed on the radicular pulp stumps and perforation area with slight pressure until the bleeding was controlled. The MTA was applied into the perforation and pulp chamber area with the aid of a sterile amalgam carrier. The teeth were restored with resin-modified glass ionomer cement.

Follow-up

Clinical and radiographic follow-up examinations were carried out at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after perforation sealing. Both the cases remained asymptomatic, presenting no discomfort, mobility, swelling, or fistula after 24-months follow-up. Radiographically, the radiolucent area disappeared as a result of bone formation in the inter-radicular space, showing adjacent tissue preservation.

Conclusion

Thus, MTA may be considered as an ideal option for conservative treatment of immediate and mediate furcal perforation in primary teeth, once it promoted repair with tooth maintenance in both the cases.

Keywords

Furcation Mineral trioxide aggregate Tooth Wound healing 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from the parents or guardians of the children participants in this case report.

References

  1. De Menezes Oliveira MA, Torres CP, Gomes-Silva JM, et al. Microstructure and mineral composition of dental enamel of permanent and deciduous teeth. Microsc Res Tech. 2010;73:572–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fuss Z, Trope M. Root perforations: classification and treatment choices based on prognostic factors. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1996;12:255–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Haghgoo R, Niyakan M, Nazari Moghaddam K, Asgary S, Mostafaloo N. An in vitro comparison of furcal perforation repaired with pro-root mta and new endodontic cement in primary molar teeth—a microleakage study. J Dent (Shiraz). 2014;15:28–32.Google Scholar
  4. Hashem AA, Hassanien EE. ProRoot MTA, MTA-Angelus and IRM used to repair large furcation perforations: sealability study. J Endod. 2008;34:59–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Holland R, Bisco Ferreira L, de Souza V, et al. Reaction of the lateral periodontium of dogs’ teeth to contaminated and noncontaminated perforations filled with mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2007;33:1192–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ibarrola JL, Biggs SG, Beeson TJ. Repair of a large furcation perforation: a four-year follow-up. J Endod. 2008;34:617–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Krupp C, Bargholz C, Brusehaber M, Hulsmann M. Treatment outcome after repair of root perforations with mineral trioxide aggregate: a retrospective evaluation of 90 teeth. J Endod. 2013;39:1364–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lourenço Neto N, Marques NC, Fernandes AP, et al. Immunolocalization of dentin matrix protein-1 in human primary teeth treated with different pulp capping materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2016;104:165–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Masuda K, Nakano K, Okawa R, et al. Successful application of atelocollagen for treatment of perforated teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;36:1–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mente J, Hage N, Pfefferle T, et al. Treatment outcome of mineral trioxide aggregate: repair of root perforations. J Endod. 2010;36:208–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nazari Moghadam K, Aghili H, Rashed Mohassel A, Zahedpasha S, Moghadamnia AA. A comparative study on sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium enriched cement and bone cement in furcal perforations. Minerva Stomatol. 2014;63:203–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Oliveira TM, Sakai VT, Silva TC, et al. Repair of furcal perforation treated with mineral trioxide aggregate in a primary molar tooth: 20-month follow-up. J Dent Child (Chic). 2008;75:188–91.Google Scholar
  13. Oliveira TM, Moretti AB, Sakai VT, et al. Clinical, radiographic and histologic analysis of the effects of pulp capping materials used in pulpotomies of human primary teeth. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013;14:65–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pace R, Giuliani V, Pagavino G. Mineral trioxide aggregate as repair material for furcal perforation: case series. J Endod. 2008;34:1130–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review-part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod. 2010a;36:16–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review-part III: clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod. 2010b;36:400–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pontius V, Pontius O, Braun A, Frankenberger R, Roggendorf MJ. Retrospective evaluation of perforation repairs in 6 private practices. J Endod. 2013;39:1346–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Selvakumar H, Kavitha S, Vijayakumar R, Eapen T, Bharathan R. Study of pulp chamber morphology of primary mandibular molars using spiral computed tomography. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014;15:726–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Siew K, Lee AH, Cheung GS. Treatment outcome of repaired root perforation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2015;41:1795–804.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Silveira CM, Sánchez-Ayala A, Lagravère MO, Pilatti GL, Gomes OM. Repair of furcal perforation with mineral trioxide aggregate: long-term follow-up of 2 cases. J Can Dent Assoc. 2008;74:729–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tavassoli-Hojjati S, Kameli S, Rahimian-Emam S, Ahmadyar M, Asgary S. Calcium enriched mixture cement for primary molars exhibiting root perforations and extensive root resorption: report of three cases. Pediatr Dent. 2014;36:23E–7E.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Torabinejad M, Chivian N. Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 1999;25:197–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Torabinejad M, Parirokh M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review–part II: leakage and biocompatibility investigations. J Endod. 2010;36:190–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsesis I, Fuss Z. Diagnosis and treatment of accidental root perforations. Endod Top. 2006;13:95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Unal GC, Maden M, Isidan T. Repair of furcal iatrogenic perforation with mineral trioxide aggregate: two years follow-up of two cases. Eur J Dent. 2010;4:475–81.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. C. T. Marques
    • 1
  • N. Lourenço Neto
    • 1
  • T. M. Oliveira
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Public Health, Bauru School of DentistryUSP-University of São PauloBauruBrazil

Personalised recommendations