Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 57–62 | Cite as

Comparison of microtensile bond strength of a resin composite to enamel conditioned by acid etching and Er,Cr:YSGG laser in human primary teeth

  • B. Malekafzali
  • R. Fekrazad
  • A. Mirfasihi
  • S. SaediEmail author
Original Scientific Article

Abstract

Aim

This study was designed to compare the bond strength of composite resin restorations on the buccal surface of primary human canine after conditioning by conventional acid etching and Er,Cr:YSGG laser.

Methods

Twenty sound primary canines were cut buccolingually into two halves and each half was randomly placed in Er,Cr:YSGG laser or acid etch group. The samples in the acid etch group were etched with 37 % phosphoric acid for 30 s. The samples in the laser group were prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser. The G6-Tips and 600 µm diameter were used with a 1.5 W of power output, pulse duration of 140 µs and repetition rate of 20 Hz. The bonding agent was applied on the buccal surface of each sample and layers of resin composite were placed. The samples’ bond strengths were evaluated by a microtensile test instrument.

Results

The mean of microtensile bond strength was 18.55 ± 6.41 in the laser group and 24.62 ± 5.56 in acid etch group. Microtensile bond strength achieved by laser conditioning was significantly lower than microtensile bond strength achieved by the conventional acid etching. Statistics To compare the results between the acid etch and laser group, the paired t test was performed (p value < 0.001).

Conclusion

Conditioning enamel in primary teeth by Er,Cr:YSGG laser, cannot be used as an alternative method for acid etching and cannot substitute this conventional method.

Keywords

Er,Cr:YSGG laser Microtensile bond strength Enamel conditioning Primary tooth 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This manuscript was prepared based on a postdoctoral thesis (code number: 598), in Pediatric Department, Dental School of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences under supervision of Prof. Beheshteh Malekafzali.

References

  1. Agostini FG, Kaaden C, Powers JM. Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2001;23:481–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Batayneh OB, Seow WK, Walsh LJ. Assessment of Er:YAG Laser for cavity preparation in primary and permanent teeth: a scanning electron microscopy and thermographic study. Pediatr Dent. 2014;36:90–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Basaran G, Ozer T, Berk N, Hamamci O. Etching enamel for orthodontics with an erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser system. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:117–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Başaran EG, Ayna E, Başaran G, Beydemir K. Influence of different power outputs of erbium, chromium:yttrium–scandium–gallium-garnet laser and acid etching on shear bond strengths of a dual-cure resin cement to enamel. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26:13–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berk N, Başaran G, Ozer T. Comparison of sandblasting, laser irradiation, and conventional acid etching for orthodontic bonding of molar tubes. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:183–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borsatto MC, Corona SA, Ramos RP, et al. Microleakage at sealant/enamel interface of primary teeth: effect of Er:YAG laser ablation of pits and fissures. J Dent Child (Chic). 2004;71:143–7.Google Scholar
  7. Borsatto MC, Corona SA, de Araújo FP, et al. Effect of Er:YAG laser on tensile bond strength of sealants in primary teeth. J Dent Child (Chic). 2007;74:104–8.Google Scholar
  8. Burnett LH Jr, Shinkai RS, Eduardo Cde P. Tensile bond strength of a one-bottle adhesive system to indirect composites treated with Er:YAG laser, air abrasion, or fluoridric acid. Photomed Laser Surg. 2004;22:351–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Menezes Oliveira MA, Torres CP, Gomes-Silva JM, et al. Microstructure and mineral composition of dental enamel of permanent and deciduous teeth. Microsc Res Tech. 2010;2010(73):572–7.Google Scholar
  10. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yudhira R, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Micro-tensile bond strength of two adhesives to Erbium:YAG-lased vs. bur-cut enamel and dentin. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110:322–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Firat E, Gurgan S, Gutknecht N. Microtensile bond strength of an etch-and-rinse adhesive to enamel and dentin after Er:YAG laser pretreatment with different pulse durations. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27:15–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gonçalves M, Corona SA, Pécora JD, Dibb RG. Influence of the frequency of Er:YAG laser on the bond strength of dental enamel. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2003;21:105–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Murakami Y, Matsumoto K. Microleakage of composite resin restoration in cavities prepared by Er, Cr:YSGG laser irradiation and etched bur cavities in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2002;26:263–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hosseini MH, Namvar F, Chalipa J, et al. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel prepared By Er:YAG Laser and conventional acid-etching. J Dent (Tehran). 2012;9:20–6.Google Scholar
  15. Jaberi Ansari Z, Fekrazad R, Feizi S, et al. The effect of an Er, Cr:YSGG laser on the micro-shear bond strength of composite to the enamel and dentin of human permanent teeth. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;2012(27):761–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kohara EK, Hossain M, Kimura Y, et al. Morphological and microleakage studies of the cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser irradiation in primary teeth. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2002;20:141–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krifka S, Börzsönyi A, Koch A, et al. Bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin and enamel–human vs bovine primary teeth in vitro. Dent Mater. 2008;24:888–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krishnan K, Kumaran NK, Iyer VH, Rajasigamani K. Laser etched vs conventional etched enamel: effect on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Int J Laser Dent. 2013;3:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lorenzo MC, Portillo M, Albaladejo A, et al. Effect of ultrashort laser microstructuring of enamel and dentin surfaces on bond strengths in orthodontics and conservative dentistry. Photonics Laser Med. 2012;1:171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nordenvall KJ, Brännström M, Malmgren O. Etching of deciduous teeth and young and old permanent teeth a comparison between 15 and 60 seconds of etching. Am J Orthod. 1980;78:99–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Obeidi A, Liu PR, Ramp LC, Beck P, Gutknecht N. Acid-etch interval and shear bond strength of Er, Cr:YSGG laser-prepared enamel and dentin. Lasers Med Sci. 2010;25:363–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Olivi G, Genovese MD. Laser restorative dentistry in children and adolescents. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011;12:68–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sağır S, Usumez A, Ademci E, Usumez S. Effect of enamel laser irradiation at different pulse settings on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:973–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sasaki LH, Lobo PD, Moriyama Y, et al. Tensile bond strength and SEM analysis of enamel etched with Er:YAG laser and phosphoric acid: a comparative study in vitro. Braz Dent J. 2008;19:57–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, Hayes C. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings from the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:763–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sungurtekin E, Oztaş N. The effect of erbium, chromium:yttrium–scandium–gallium-garnet laser etching on marginal integrity of a resin-based fissure sealant in primary teeth. Lasers Med Sci. 2010;25:841–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Uşümez S, Orhan M, Uşümez A. Laser etching of enamel for direct bonding with an Er, Cr:YSGG hydrokinetic laser system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:649–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wanderley RL, Monghini EM, Pecora JD, Palma-Dibb RG, Borsatto MC. Shear bond strength to enamel of primary teeth irradiated with varying Er:YAG laser energies and SEM examination of the surface morphology: an in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005;23:260–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wen X, Zhang L, Liu R, et al. Effects of pulsed Nd:YAG laser on tensile bond strength and caries resistance of human enamel. Oper Dent. 2014;39:273–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yamada Y, Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Murakami Y, Matsumoto K. Microleakage of composite resin restoration in cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser irradiation in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002;3:39–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Malekafzali
    • 1
  • R. Fekrazad
    • 2
  • A. Mirfasihi
    • 3
  • S. Saedi
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Dental SchoolShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Laser Research Center in Medical Sciences (LRCMS), Periodontal Department, Dental FacultyAJA University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  3. 3.Dental SchoolShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations