European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 293–299 | Cite as

Occlusion and occlusal characteristics of primary dentition in North Indian children of East Lucknow region

  • R. KhanEmail author
  • N. Singh
  • S. Govil
  • S. Tandon
Original Scientific Article



To determine occlusion and occlusal characteristics of the primary dentition in North Indian school-going children of East Lucknow region.

Study design

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 453 participants in the age group of 3–6 years.


Participants were selected randomly and occlusal relationship was assessed based on Baume’s classification. Various other occlusal characteristics were also recorded and assessed based on clinical and photographic evaluation. The data were then subjected to statistical analysis.


Out of 453 participants examined, results revealed 62.3 % had flush terminal plane; 31.3 % mesial step molar relationship and 6.4 % distal step molar relationship. It was also observed that 91.6 % had Class I canine relationship, 93.4 % primate spaces, 69.5 % physiologic spaces. Amongst other occlusal characteristics, increased overbite and crowding were prevalent. Association of various occlusal characteristics and oral habits with respect to primary molar relation was also assessed.


Chi-square test was performed to carry out statistical analysis. p value <0.05 was taken as statistically significant.


It was found that flush terminal plane relationship with spacing and Class I canine relationship predominated. Further prospective studies are required to provide an insight into patterns of occlusal relationship and its changes in Indian children.


Occlusion Occlusal characteristics Primary dentition 


  1. Abu Alhaija ES, Qudeimat MA. Occlusion and tooth/arch dimensions in the primary dentition of preschool Jordanian children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003;13(4):230–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adair SM, Milano M, Lorenzo I, Russell C. Effects of current and former pacifier use on the dentition of 24- to 59-month-old children. Pediatr Dent. 1995;17(7):437–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alamoudi N. The prevalence of crowding, attrition, midline discrepancies and premature tooth loss in the primary dentition of children in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1999;24(1):53–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baume LJ. Physiological tooth migration and its significance for the development of occlusion: I. The biogenetic course of deciduous dentition. J Dent Res. 1950;29:123–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishara SE, Hoppens BJ, Jakobsen JR, Kohout FJ. Changes in the molar relationship between the deciduous and permanent dentitions: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93(1):19–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bokyo DJ. The incidence of primate spaces in fifty 3 year old children of the Burlington Study. Am J Orthod. 1968;54(6):462–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carvalho JC, Vinker F, Declerck D. Malocclusion, dental injuries and dental anomalies in the primary dentition of Belgian children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1998;8(2):137–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Damle SG. Textbook of Pediatric Dentistry. 2nd edn; New Delhi: Arya 2002.Google Scholar
  9. Dutra ALT, Berto PM, Vieira LDS, de Toledo OA. Longitudinal changes in the molar relationship from primary to permanent dentition. ConScientiae Saude. 2009;8(2):171–6.Google Scholar
  10. Farsi NM, Salama FS. Characteristics of primary dentition occlusion in a group of Saudi children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1996;6(4):253–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farsi NM, Salama FS. Sucking habits in Saudi children: prevalence, contributing factors and effects on the primary dentition. Pediatr Dent. 1997;19(1):28–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster TD, Grundy MC. Occlusal changes from primary to permanent dentitions. Br J Orthod. 1986;13(4):187–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Foster TD, Hamilton MC. Occlusion in the primary dentition. Study of children at 21/2 to 3 years age. Br Dent J. 1969;126(2):76–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hegde S, Panwar S, Bolar DR, Sanghavi MB. Characteristics of occlusion in primary dentition of preschool children of Udaipur, India. Eur J Dent. 2012;6(1):51–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Infante PF. An epidemologic study of deciduous molar relations in preschool children. J Dent Res. 1975;54(4):723–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kabue MM, Moracha JK, Ng’ang’a PM. Malocclusion in children aged 3–6 years in Nairobi, Kenya. East Afr Med J. 1995;72(4):210–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaufman A, Koyoumdjisky E. Normal occlusal patterns in the deciduous dentition in preschool children in Israel. J Dent Res. 1967;46(3):478–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kerosuo H, Laine T, Nyyssonen V, Honkala E. Occlusal characteristics in groups of Tanzanian and Finnish urban school children. Angle Orthod. 1991;61(1):49–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Malandris M, Mahoney EK. Aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of posterior crossbites in the primary dentition. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2004;14(3):155–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moyers RE. Handbook of Orthodontics, 3rd edn. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers; 1972.Google Scholar
  21. Nanda RS, Khan I, Anand R. Age changes in the occlusal pattern of deciduous dentition. J Dent Res. 1973;52(2):221–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Otuyemi OD, Sote EO, Isiekwe MC, Jones SP. Occlusal relationships and spacing or crowding of teeth in the dentitions of 3–4-year-old Nigerian children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1997;7(3):155–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ravn JJ. Occlusion in the primary dentition in 3-year-old children. Scand J Dent Res. 1975;83(3):123–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Reddy BP, Rani MS, Santosh R, Shailaja AM. Incidence of malocclusion in deciduous dentition of Bangalore South population-India. IJCD. 2010;1(1):20–3.Google Scholar
  25. Romero CC, Scavone-Junior H, Garib DG, Cotrim-Ferreira FA, Ferriera RI. Breastfeeding and non-nutritive sucking patterns related to the prevalence of anterior open bite in primary dentition. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(2):161–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Suma G, Das UM. Crowding, spacing and closed dentition and its relationship with malocclusion in primary dentition. Int J Clin Dent Sci. 2010;1(1):16–9.Google Scholar
  27. Tandon S. Textbook of Pedodontics. 2nd edn. Hyderabad: Paras; 2008. p. 109.Google Scholar
  28. Tschill P, Bacon W, Sonko A. Malocclusion in the deciduous dentition of Caucasian children. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19(4):361–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Warren JJ, Bishara SE. Duration of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking behaviours and their effects on the dental arches in the primary dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121(4):347–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yemitan TA, daCosta OO, Sanu OO, Iseikwe MC. Effects of digit sucking on dental arch dimensions in the primary dentition. Afr J Med Sci. 2010;39(1):55–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pedodontics and Preventive DentistrySaraswati Dhanwantari Dental College and HospitalParbhaniIndia
  2. 2.Department of Pedodontics and Preventive DentistryBabu Banarasi Das College of Dental SciencesLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations