Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 175–181 | Cite as

The effects of fruit smoothies on enamel erosion

  • J. F. TahmassebiEmail author
  • P. Kandiah
  • S. Sukeri
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

This prospective, randomised in vitro study was to investigate the pH and titratable acidity of fruit smoothie drinks and to assess the effect of these drinks on enamel erosion.

Method

Fifty enamel slabs were divided into five groups which were allocated to the sample solutions groups: Innocent® smoothie strawberries and bananas (SB), Innocent® smoothie mangoes and passion fruit (MP) and Diet Coke. Distilled deionised water (DD) was used as negative control and citric acid 0.3 % as positive control. All the slabs were subjected to a 21-day pH cycling regime involving 2 min of immersions, five times a day with appropriate remineralization periods in between. Measurement of surface loss was assessed using profilometry. Independent sample t tests were used to compare mean.

Results

The titratable acidity for both test smoothies were 3.5–4 times more than that needed to neutralise Diet Coke and citric acid 0.3 %. The pH of SB, MP smoothie and Diet Coke was found to be 3.73, 3.59 and 2.95, respectively. MP smoothie caused the greatest amount of surface loss followed by Diet Coke. Both smoothies were found to cause significant surface loss. MP smoothie resulted in significantly higher surface loss compared with MB smoothie and citric acid 3 %.

Conclusion

The smoothies tested were acidic and had high titratable acidity. They produced a significant erosion of enamel in vitro. The results of this study suggest that there should be increased awareness of the erosive effects of smoothies especially as their consumption seems to be on the increase.

Keywords

Smoothies Enamel erosion Citric acid 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was conducted as part of a master’s project and acknowledgement goes to those that helped in the lab and support from staff from the University of Leeds including statistical help provided.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

References

  1. Abdullah AZ. In vitro and in situ studies to investigate the erosion of human dental tissue. PhD Thesis, Leeds Dental Institute. Leeds, University of Leeds, 2009.Google Scholar
  2. Amaechi BT, Higham SM, Edgar WM. Techniques for the production of dental eroded lesions in vitro. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:97–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bashir E, Lagerlof F. Effects of citric acid clearance on the saturation with respect to hydroxyapatite in saliva. Caries Res. 1996;30:213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beighton D, Brailsford SR, Gilbert S. Intra-oral acid production associated with eating whole or pulped raw fruits. Caries Resc. 2004;38:341–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blacker SM, Creanor SL, Creanor S. An in vitro investigation of the initial pH and titratable acidity of a selection of fruit smoothies. Dent Update. 2011;38:604–6, 608–9.Google Scholar
  6. Blacker SM, Chadwick RG. An in vitro investigation of the erosive potential of smoothies. Br Dent J. 2013;214(4):E9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulton R. The relationship between total acidity, titratable acidity and pH in wine. Am Enol Viticul. 1980;31:76–80.Google Scholar
  8. Cairns AM, Watson M, Creanor SL, Foye RH. The pH and titratable acidity of a range of diluting drinks and their potential effect on dental erosion. J Dent. 2002;30:313–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dugmore CR, Rock WP. A multifactorial analysis of factors associated with dental erosion. Br Dent J. 2004;196:283–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards M, Creanor SL, Foye RH, Gilmour WH. Buffering capacity of soft drinks: the potential influence on dental erosion. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:923–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hannig C, Hamkens A, Becker K, Attin R, Attin T. Erosive effects of different acids on bovine enamel: release of calcium and phosphate in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. 2005;50:541–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hooper SM, Newcombe RG, Faller R, et al. The protective effects of toothpaste against erosion by orang juice: studies in situ and in vitro. J Dent. 2007;35:476–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hussein I, Pollard MA, Curzon ME. A comparison of the effects of some extrinsic and intrinsic sugars on dental plaque pH. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1996;6:81–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jensdottir T, Holbrook P, Nauntofte B, Buchwald C, Bardow A. Immediate erosive potential of cola drinks and orange juices. JDent Resh. 2006;85:226–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koulourides T, Chien MC. The ICT in situ experimental model in dental research. J Dent Res. 1992;71:822–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lussi A, Jaegger T, Zero D. The role of diet in the aetiology of tooth erosion. Caries Res. 2004;38(suppl):34–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mercer C. Smoothie operators lead UK health binge. Beveragedaily.com 2007. Online article available at http://www.beveragedaily.com/Markets/Smoothie-operators-lead-UK-health-binge (Accessed May 2013).
  18. Mintel Smoothies, Market Intelligence—UK. In: Mintel International group Limited (ed.) London, 2008.Google Scholar
  19. Ruxton CHS, Gardner EJ, Walker A. Can pure fruit and vegetable juices protect against cancer and cardiovascular disease too?A review of the evidence. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2006;57:249–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ruxton CHS. Smoothies: one portion or two? Nut Bull. 2008;33:129–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tahmassebi JF, Duggal MS, Malik-Kotru G, Curzon ME. Soft drinks and dental health: a review of the current literature. J Dent. 2006;34:2–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ten Cate JM. In vitro studies on the effects of fluoride on de- and remineralization. J Dent Res. 1990;69:614–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. ten Cate JM. In situ models, physico-chemical aspects. Adv Dent Res. 1994;8:125–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. White DJ. The comparative sensitivity of intra-oral, in vitro, and animal models in the ‘profile’ evaluation of topical fluorides. J Dent Res. 1992;71:884–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. YouGov. Survey of smoothie consumption. 2008. For further information: http://www.yougov.com.

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Paediatric DentistryLeeds Dental InstituteLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations