Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 159–165 | Cite as

Enamel defects on the maxillary premolars in patients with cleft lip and/or palate: a retrospective case-control study

  • S. Carpentier
  • E. Ghijselings
  • J. Schoenaers
  • C. Carels
  • A. VerdonckEmail author
Original Scientific Article

Abstract

Aim

The purpose of this study was to investigate the presence of developmental defects of enamel on maxillary premolars in patients with cleft lip and/or palate. In addition, the relationship with the surgical technique of soft palate closure was studied. Such a relationship could be suspected since formation of enamel occurs around the same time period as soft palate closure.

Materials and methods

The study consisted of three groups. Patients from the first group (n = 123) were recruited from the Cleft Lip and Palate Team of the University Hospitals Leuven (CLPT-UHL). The second group (n = 81) consisted of patients consulting the Cleft Lip and Palate Team of the Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen (CLPT-UMCN). Healthy non-cleft lip and/or palate patients (n = 100) recruited from a private orthodontic practice were enrolled in group 3. All maxillary premolars were examined.

Results

Out of the total sample, 43 patients showed developmental defects on one or more premolars. All defects occurred in patients of group 1 who received surgical closure by the CLPT-UHL. None of the patients from group 2 and 3 showed defects.

Conclusions

It can be suggested that the surgical technique, used by the CLPT-UHL for soft palate closure, causes these defects. It is postulated that the technique used by the CLPT-UHL leads to interference with the blood supply of the developing premolar at a critical stage of tooth enamel development. More research is needed to confirm these findings.

Keywords

Enamel defects Maxillary premolars Cleft patients 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. Em. F. Ostyn, ENT surgeon, Prof. Dr. G. Hens, ENT surgeon, Prof. Dr. V. Van der Poorten, ENT surgeon, and Mrs. C. Vergalle, paediatric dentist, of the Cleft Lip and Palate Team, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; W. Coucke, statisticus; and Prof. Dr. A.M. Kuijpers-Jagtman, orthodontist, and Prof. Dr. Em. P.H.M. Spauwen, plastic surgeon, both of the Cleft Palate Craniofacial Unit Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands for their contribution to this article.

References

  1. Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Uslu O, Memikoglu UT. Dental anomalies in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:207–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Jamal GA, Hazza’a A, Rawashdeh MA. Prevalence of dental anomalies in a population of cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010;47:413–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Camporesi M, Baccetti T, Marinelli A, Defraia E, Franchi L. Maxillary dental anomalies in children with cleft lip and palate: a controlled study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010;20:442–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Commission on Oral Health, Research and Epidemiology. An epidemiological index of developmental defects of dental enamal (DDE Index). Int Dent J. 1982;32:159–67.Google Scholar
  5. Derijcke A, Eerens A, Carels C. The incidence of oral clefts: a review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;34:488–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dixon MJ, Marazita ML, Beaty TH, Murray JC. Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:167–78.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eerens K, Vlietinck R, Heidbuchel K, et al. Hypodontia and tooth formation in groups of children with cleft, siblings without cleft, and nonrelated controls. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38:374–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fraser FC. The genetics of cleft lip and palate. Am J Hum Genet. 1970;22:336–52.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Galante JM, Costa B, de Carvalho Carrara CF, Gomide MR. Prevalence of enamel hypoplasia in deciduous canines of patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42:675–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Vicinus JH. Third molar polymorphism and its significance to dental genetics. J Dent Res. 1963;42:1344–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gomes AC, Neves LT, Gomide MR. Enamel defects in maxillary central incisors of infants with unilateral cleft lip. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46:420–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kotsomitis N, Dunne MP, Freer TJ. A genetic aetiology for some common dental anomalies: a pilot twin study. Aust Orthod J. 1996;14:172–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lekkas C, Latief BS, Ter Rahe SPN, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. The adult unoperated cleft patient: absence of maxillary teeth outside the cleft area. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:17–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leow AM, Lo LJ. Palatoplasty: evolution and controversies. Chang Gung Med J. 2008;31:335–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lucas VS, Gupta R, Ololade O, Gelbier M, Roberts GJ. Dental health indices and caries associated microflora in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:447–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mangold E, Ludwig KU, Nöthen MM. Breakthroughs in the genetics of orofacial clefting. Trends Mol Med. 2011;17:725–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Needleman HL, Leviton A, Allred E. Macroscopic enamel defects of primary anterior teeth-types, prevalence, and distribution. Pediatr Dent. 1991;13:208–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ranta R. A review of tooth formation in children with cleft lip/palate. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1986;90:11–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ribeiro LL, DasNeves LT, Costa B, Gomide MR. Dental anomalies of the permanent lateral incisors and prevalence of hypodontia outside the cleft area in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003;40:172–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ruiz LA, Maya RR, D’Alpino PH, Atta MT, Svizero NR. Prevalence of enamel defects in permanent teeth of patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012; Epub ahead of print.Google Scholar
  21. Slayton RL, Warren JJ, Kannellis MJ, Levy SM, Islam M. Prevalence of enamel hypoplasia and isolated opacities in the primary dentition. Pediatr Dent. 2001;23:32–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sofaer JA. Human tooth-size asymmetry in cleft lip with of without cleft palate. Arch Oral Biol. 1979;24:141–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ten Cate AR. Oral Histology: development, structure and function. In: ten Cate AR, editor. Amelogenesis. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2001. p. 186–204.Google Scholar
  24. Van der Poorten V, Ostyn F, Van Kerckhoven W, et al. The Leuven staged supraperiosteal retropositioning repair: long-term velopharyngeal function in non-syndromic cleft palate. B-ENT. 2006;2:35–43.Google Scholar
  25. Via WF Jr, Churchill JA. Relationship of enamel hypoplasia to abnormal events of gestation and birth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1959;59:702–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Carpentier
    • 1
  • E. Ghijselings
    • 1
  • J. Schoenaers
    • 2
  • C. Carels
    • 3
    • 4
  • A. Verdonck
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Oral Health Sciences-OrthodonticsKatholieke Universiteit Leuven and Dentistry, University Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Maxillofacial SurgeryKatholieke Universiteit Leuven, University Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Oral Health Sciences-OrthodonticsKatholieke Universiteit Leuven, University Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  4. 4.Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial ResearchRadboud University Nijmegen Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations