Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 121–126 | Cite as

Mandibular block success rate in relation to needle insertion and position: a self-report survey

  • M. AshkenaziEmail author
  • I. Sher
  • M. Rackoz
  • D. Schwartz-Arad
Original Article
  • 134 Downloads

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate possible associations between successful mandibular block injection and location of penetrating the oral mucosa, location of injection on the ramus and the needle insertion length.

Study design

The study consisted of 101 dentists, of whom, 33 were oral surgeons, 33 certified paediatric dentists and 35 general dental practitioners. The dentists were asked to estimate their rate of success in mandibular block injections, defined as the proportion of their patients for whom only a single carpule was necessary, and to indicate the needle insertion length and the location of the injection on a photograph of a ramus and on a photograph of the oral mucosa.

Results

Injecting a single carpule for achieving full anaesthesia in 90 % or more of their patients was reported by 79.3 and 57.8 % of the dentists treating children and adults, respectively. Of practitioners treating children, experienced dentists (>5 years in occupation) reported higher success rates than did inexperienced ones (p = 0.05). A positive correlation was found between failure rate reported in children, shorter length of the inserted needle (R = 0.356, p = 0.001) and injecting at the central (superior inferior dimension) most anterior quarters of the ramus (p = 0.006; odd ratio = 3.9375). Routine waiting period of more than 5 min after the injection and before operative treatment was associated with higher rates of failure (p = 0.042, χ2 = 6.335).

No correlation was found between the success rates of mandibular block injection and the location of penetrating the oral mucosa in children (p = 0.94), adults (p = 0.57), or between success rates and the target location on the ramus in adults (p = 0.42).

Statistics

χ2 test was used to determine the significance of differences among proportions and t test for continuous variables. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to analyse the correlation between the length of the needle inserted in children and adults by the same dentist.

Conclusions

Shorter needle insertion lengths and targeting the injecting to the most anterior quarters of the ramus were positively correlated with failure of anaesthesia in children, according to dentists’ reports. A routine waiting period of over 5 min did not increase the success rates of mandibular block injection.

Keywords

Inferior alveolar nerve Injection Local analgesia 

References

  1. Ashkenazi M, Taubman L, Gavish A. Age-associated changes of the mandibular foramen position in anteroposterior dimension and of the mandibular angle in dry human mandibles. Anat Rec. 2011;294:1319–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benham NR. The cephalometric position of the mandibular foramen with age. ASDC J Dent Child. 1976;43:233–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Childers M, Reader A, Nist R, Beck M, Meyers WJ. Anesthetic efficacy of the periodontal ligament injection after an inferior alveolar nerve block. J Endod. 1996;22:317–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. da Fontoura RA, Vasconcellos HA, Campos AE. Morphologic basis for the intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: anatomic and radiographic localization of the mandibular foramen. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60: 660–5 (discussion 665–6).Google Scholar
  5. Fujimura K, Segami N, Kobayashi S. Anatomical study of the complications of intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:384–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hayward J, Richardson ER, Malhotra SK. The mandibular foramen: its anteroposterior position. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977;44:837–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harrison SM. Regional anesthesia for children. Dent Rec. 1948;68:146–55.Google Scholar
  8. Hetson G, Share J, Frommer J, Kronman JH. Statistical evaluation of the position of the mandibular foramen. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988;65:32–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jorgensen NB, Hayden JJ. Sedation, local and general anesthesia in dentistry, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1980. p. 98.Google Scholar
  10. Kaufman E, Weinstein P, Milgrom P. Difficulties in achieving local anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984;108:205–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia, 5th ed. California: Elsevier Mosby; 2004. p. 231, 274–5.Google Scholar
  12. McDonald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA. Local anesthesia and pain control for the child and adolescent. In: McDonald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA, editors. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004. p. 273.Google Scholar
  13. Monheim LM. Local anesthesia and pain control in dental practice. 4th ed. St. Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company; 1969. p. 47.Google Scholar
  14. Nicholson ML. A study of the position of the mandibular foramen in the adult human mandible. Anat Rec. 1985;212:110–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, McTigue DJ, Fields HW, Nowak AJ, editors. Paediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 452–3.Google Scholar
  16. Ricketts RM. Mechanisms of mandibular growth: a series of inquiries on the growth of the mandible, determinants of mandibular form and growth. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan. 1975. p. 77–100.Google Scholar
  17. Sweet APS. Canals and foramina of maxilla and mandible. Dent Radiogr Photogr. 1943;16:13–6.Google Scholar
  18. Tsai HH. Panoramic radiographic findings of the mandibular growth from deciduous dentition to early permanent dentition. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2002;26:279–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tsai HH. Panoramic radiographic findings of the mandibular foramen from deciduous to early permanent dentition. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2004;28:215–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Weiss KM. On the systematic bias in skeletal sexing. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1972;37:239–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Ashkenazi
    • 1
    Email author
  • I. Sher
    • 2
  • M. Rackoz
    • 3
  • D. Schwartz-Arad
    • 4
  1. 1.Pediatric Dentistry Dental ClinicPetach-TikvaIsrael
  2. 2.The Hebrew University, Hadassah School of Dental MedicineJerusalemIsrael
  3. 3.Division of Pediatric and Hospital DentistryThe Chaim Sheba Medical CenterTel HashomerIsrael
  4. 4.The Day-Care Surgical Center, Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryAdvanced Implantology, Periodontology and EndodontologyRamat HasharonIsrael

Personalised recommendations