Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 51–54 | Cite as

Evaluation of the multifrequency electronic apex locator Joypex 5 in primary teeth

  • E. J. N. L. SilvaEmail author
  • D. R. Herrera
  • E. J. Souza-Júnior
  • T. P. Rosa
Original Scientific Article

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate ex vivo the accuracy of the multifrequency electronic apex locator (EAL) Joypex 5 in primary molars.

Methods

Fourteen primary molars were selected for a total of 25 root canals. Working length measurements were performed by direct observation (DO), using a 15 K-file into the root canal until its tip was visible at the apical foramen and electronically using the EALs Joypex 5. Data were analysed statistically using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). To assess whether a significant difference in accuracy of the electronic apex locator existed, the Student’s t test was performed at 5 % significance.

Results

No statistical difference was observed between the direct observation and the EAL measurement (p < 0.05). The ICC confirmed the agreement of different methods to measure canal length. The R 2 coefficient was close to 1, denoting a strong agreement between measures obtained with Joypex 5 and DO.

Conclusion

The multifrequency EALs Joypex 5 showed adequate accuracy in the root length determination of primary teeth.

Keywords

Endodontics Electronic apex locator Primary teeth 

References

  1. Angwaravong O, Panitvisai P. Accuracy of an electronic apex locator in primary teeth with root resorption. Int Endod J. 2009;42:115–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azar MR, Mokhtare M. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22:363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beltrame AP, Triches TC, Sartori N, Bolan M. Electronic determination of root canal working length in primary molar teeth: na in vivo and ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2011;44:402–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunton PA, Abdeen D, MacFarlane TV. The effect of an apex locator on exposure to radiation during endodontic therapy. J Endod. 2002;28:524–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Vardasca Oliveira PT, Chita JJ, Silva PG, De Vicente FS, Pereira KF. Accuracy of two apex locators made in China compared to Root ZX II. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr. 2010;10:83–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ElAyouti A, Weiger R, Lost C. Frequency of overinstrumentation with an acceptable radiographic working length. J Endod. 2001;27:49–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuks AB, Eidelman E. Pulp therapy in the primary dentition. Cur Opin Dent. 1991;1:556–63.Google Scholar
  8. Katz A, Mass E, Kaufman AY. Electronic apex locator: a useful tool for root canal treatment in the primary dentition. J Dent Child. 1996;63:414–7.Google Scholar
  9. Kielbassa AM, Muller U, Munz I, Monting JS. Clinical evaluation of the measuring accuracy of Root ZX in primary teeth. O Surg O Med O Pathol O Radiol Endod. 2003;95:94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leonardo MR, Silva LA, Nelson-Filho P, Silva RA, Raffaini MS. Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth. Int Endod J. 2008;41:317–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leonardo MR, da Silva LA, Nelson-Filho P, da Silva RA, Lucisano MP. Ex vivo accuracy of an apex locator using digital signal processing in primary teeth. Ped Dent. 2009;31:320–2.Google Scholar
  12. Majeed MA, Subhi AG. Assessment of the accuracy of a fifth generation apex locator (in vitro study). J Bagh Col Dent. 2011;23:12–7.Google Scholar
  13. Mello-Moura ACV, Moura-Netto C, Araki AT, Guedes-Pinto AC, Mendes FM. Ex vivo performance of five methods for root canal length determination in primary anterior teeth. Int Endod J. 2010;43:142–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nekoofar MH, Ghandi MM, Hayes SJ, Dummer PM. The fundamental operating principles of electronic root canal length measurement devices. Int Endod J. 2006;39:595–609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nelson-Filho P, Romualdo PC, Bonifácio KC, Leonardo MR, Silva RA, Silva LA. Accuracy of the iPex multi-frequency electronic apex locator in primary molars: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2011;44:303–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ricucci D. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation. Part 1. Int Endod J. 1998;31:384–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ruschel HC, Ligocki GD, Flaminghi DL, Fossati AC. Microstructure of mineralized tissues in human primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35:295–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Saritha S, Uloopi KS, Vinay C. Chandra Sekhar R, Rao VV. Clinical evaluation of Root ZX II electronic apex locator in primary teeth. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2012;13:32–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schaeffer MA, White RR, Walton RE. Determining the optimal obturation length: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod. 2005;31:271–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Soares RM, Silva EJ, Herrera DR, Krebs RL, Coutinho-Filho TS. Evaluation of Joypex 5 and Root ZX II: an in vivo and ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2013 [Epud ahead of print].Google Scholar
  21. Tosun G, Erdemir A, Eldeniz AU, Sermet U, Sener Y. Accuracy of two electronic apex locators in primary teeth with and without apical resorption: a laboratory study. Int Endod J. 2008;41:436–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. J. N. L. Silva
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • D. R. Herrera
    • 2
  • E. J. Souza-Júnior
    • 2
  • T. P. Rosa
    • 2
  1. 1.Endodontics DepartmentGrande Rio University-UNIGRANRIORio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Endodontics Department, Piracicaba Dentistry SchoolCampinas State University-UNICAMPCampinasBrazil
  3. 3.NiteróiBrazil

Personalised recommendations