Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 397–403 | Cite as

Gender differences in patterns of second premolar agenesis observed in 4,756 individuals

  • Jacob Breum Kenrad
  • Ib Jarle Christensen
  • Inger KjærEmail author
Original Scientific Article

Abstract

Aim

To elucidate intra- and inter-maxillary patterns of second premolar agenesis in the mandible and maxilla—including unilateral and/or bilateral occurrence and gender differences.

Study design

The study comprised panoramic radiographs from 4,756 children with and without orthodontic treatment needs.

Methods

All radiographs were screened twice. 251 individuals had agenesis of one or more mandibular and/or maxillary second premolars; 37 had agenesis of both mandibular and maxillary second premolars.

Statistics

Gender differences were analysed using χ² and Fisher’s exact test.

Results

193 individuals had agenesis of one or both mandibular second premolars, while 95 had agenesis of one or both maxillary second premolars. In females, agenesis of left and right second premolars was significantly associated in both the mandible and in maxilla (p < 0.0001). In males, this association was only significant in the maxilla (p < 0.0001). Bilateral agenesis occurred almost twice as frequently in females. Unilateral agenesis in the maxilla occurred almost twice as frequently in females. The probability of finding second premolar agenesis in the maxilla was significantly greater in females than in males (p = 0.03). A significant association was seen between agenesis of tooth 25 and 35 in females and males combined (p = 0.03) and in males alone (p = 0.01). No significance was found between agenesis of tooth 15 and 45 in either females or males.

Conclusions

The study confirms some previous findings of second premolar agenesis and presents new observations on gender differences, especially concerning associations in agenesis occurrence within and between the jaws.

Keywords

Tooth Agenesis Radiography Gender Trigeminal ganglia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Maria Kvetny, MA, is acknowledged for linguistic support and manuscript preparation. The IMK Foundation is acknowledged for funding.

References

  1. Baccetti T. A controlled study of associated dental anomalies. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:267–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chavéz-Lomelí ME, Mansilla LJ, Pompa JA, Kjær I. The human mandibular canal arises from three separate canals innervating different tooth groups. J Dent Res. 1996;75:1540–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Daugaard S, Christensen IJ, Kjær I. Delayed dental maturity in dentitions with agenesis of mandibular second premolars. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2010;13:191–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973;45:211–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Garib DG, Peck S, Gomes SC. Increased occurrence of dental anomalies associated with second-premolar agenesis. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:436–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Haavikko K. The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth. An orthopantomographic study. Suom Hammaslääk Toim. 1970;66:103–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jernvall J, Thesleff I. Reiterative signaling and patterning during mammalian tooth morphogenesis. Mech Dev. 2000;92:19–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kelly KA, Wei Y, Mikawa T. Cell death along the embryo midline regulates left-right sidedness. Dev Dyn. 2002;224:238–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kenrad AB, Christensen IJ, Kjær I. Craniofacial morphology of the frontonasal segment in patients with one or two macrodontic central incisors. Eur J Orthod. 2012 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  10. Kjær I. Neuro-osteology. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1998a;9:224–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kjær I. Prenatal traces of aberrant neurofacial growth. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998b;56:326–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kjær I. New diagnostics of the dentition on panoramic radiographs-Focusing on the peripheral nervous system as an important aetiological factor behind dental anomalies. Orthodontic Waves. 2012;71:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kjær I, Nolting D. Immunohistochemical PGP 9.5 positivity in human osteoblasts may indicate that compensatory and dysplastic craniofacial growth are under control by peripheral nerves. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11:196–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kjær I, Kocsis G, Nodal M, Christensen LR. Aetiological aspects of mandibular tooth agenesis—focusing on the role of nerve, oral mucosa, and supporting tissues. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:371–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Levin M. The embryonic origins of left-right asymmetry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15:197–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Luukko K, Kvinnsland IH, Kettunen P. Tissue interactions in the regulation of axon pathfinding during tooth morphogenesis. Dev Dyn. 2005;234:482–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Luukko K, Moe K, Sijaona A, Furmanek T, Hals KI, Midtbø M, Kettunen P. Secondary induction and the development of tooth nerve supply. Ann Anat. 2008;190:178–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. McSherry PF. The ectopic maxillary canine: a review. Br J Orthod. 1998;25:209–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Peck L, Peck S, Attia Y. Maxillary canine-first premolar transposition, associated dental anomalies and genetic basis. Angle Orthod. 1993;63:99–109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The palatally displaced canine as a dental anomaly of genetic origin. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:249–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Prevalence of tooth agenesis and peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisor associated with palatally displaced canine (PDC) anomaly. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;110:441–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004;32:217–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ringqvist M, Thilander B. The frequency of hypodontia in an orthodontic material. Sven Tandläk Tidskr. 1969;62:535–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rune B, Sarnäs KV. Tooth size and tooth formation in children with advanced hypodontia. Angle Orthod. 1974;44:316–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rølling S. Hypodontia of permanent teeth in Danish schoolchildren. Scand J Dent Res. 1980;88:365–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rølling S, Poulsen S. Agenesis of permanent teeth in 8138 Danish schoolchildren: prevalence and intra-oral distribution according to gender. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009;19:172–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sørensen HB, Artmann L, Larsen HJ, Kjær I. Radiographic assessment of dental anomalies in patients with ectopic maxillary canines. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009;19:108–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tabatabaie F, Sonnesen L, Kjær I. The neurocranial and craniofacial morphology in children with solitary medianmaxially central incisor (SMMCI). Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11:96–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Uslenghi S, Liversidge HM, Wong FS. A radiographic study of tooth development in hypodontia. Arch Oral Biol. 2006;51:129–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob Breum Kenrad
    • 1
  • Ib Jarle Christensen
    • 1
  • Inger Kjær
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Orthodontic Section, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen NDenmark

Personalised recommendations