European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 161–166 | Cite as

Evaluation of push-out bond strength of a new MTA-based sealer

  • I. Ş. Sönmez
  • D. Sönmez
  • M. E. AlmazEmail author
Original Scientific Article



To evaluate the push-out bond strength of MTA Fillapex (Angelus) and compare it with ProRoot MTA (Dentsply) and AH Plus (Dentsply).


Thirty extracted single-rooted teeth were selected and prepared using a rotary system. The samples were divided randomly into three groups (n = 10) and obturated, respectively, with: (1) AH Plus + gutta-percha (DiaDent); (2) MTA Fillapex + gutta-percha; (3) ProRoot MTA. Each root was sectioned into 1-mm-thick slices and 30 samples for each group were obtained. The samples were subjected to push-out test. Failure modes were examined under 30× magnification. The results were analysed statistically by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test.


Mean push-out bond strength values were ranked as follows: ProRoot MTA > AH Plus > MTA Fillapex. Statistically significant differences were found among all groups (p < 0.05).


ProRoot MTA had the highest bond strength, whilst MTA Fillapex displayed the lowest values among the groups.


Push-out bond strength MTA Fillapex AH Plus 


  1. Belli S, Ozcan E, Derinbay O, Eldeniz AU. A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of a new, self-etching, dual-curable sealer: hybrid root SEAL (MetaSEAL). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:e45–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogen G, Kuttler S. Mineral trioxide aggregate obturation: a review and case series. J Endod. 2009;35:777–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boussetta F, Bal S, Romeas A, et al. In vitro evaluation of apical microleakage following canal filling with a coated carrier system compared with lateral and thermomechanical gutta-percha condensation techniques. Int Endod J. 2003;36:367–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brackett MG, Martin R, Sword J, et al. Comparison of seal after obturation techniques using a polydimethylsiloxane-based root canal sealer. J Endod. 2006;32:1188–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brito-Júnior M, Quintino AF, Camilo CC, Normanha JA, Faria-e-Silva AL. Nonsurgical endodontic management using MTA for perforative defect of internal root resorption: report of a long term follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110:784–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandra N, Ghonem H. Interfacial mechanics of push-out tests: theory and experiments. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2001;32:575–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark-Holke D, Drake D, Walton R, Rivera E, Guthmiller JM. Bacterial penetration through canals of endodontically treated teeth in the presence or absence of the smear layer. J Dent. 2003;31:275–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cobankara FK, Adanir N, Belli S. Evaluation of the influence of smear layer on the apical and coronal sealing ability of two sealers. J Endod. 2004;30:406–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2002.Google Scholar
  10. Dammaschke T, Gerth HUV, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical and physical surface and bulk material characterization of white ProRoot MTA and two Portland cements. Dent Mater. 2005;21:731–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De-Deus G, Di Giorgi K, Fidel S, Fidel RA, Paciornik S. Push-out bond strength of Resilon/Epiphany and Resilon/Epiphany self-etch to root dentine. J Endod. 2009;35:1048–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farea M, Masudi S, Wan Bakar WZ. Apical microleakage evaluation of system B compared with cold lateral technique: in vitro study. Aust Endod J. 2010;36:48–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gandolfi MG, Iacono F, Agee K, et al. Setting time and expansion in different soaking media of experimental accelerated calcium-silicate cements and ProRoot MTA. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:e39–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jainaen A, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Push-out bond strengths of the dentine-sealer interface with and without a main cone. Int Endod J. 2007;40:882–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Material for evaluation: MTA FillapexTests performed according to International Standard (ISO) 6876, 2011. Accessed 18 Mar 2011.
  16. Nunes VH, Silva RG, Alfredo E, Sousa-Neto MD, Silva-Sousa YT. Adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentine treated with different solutions. Braz Dent J. 2008;19:46–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Onay EO, Ungor M, Ari H, Belli S, Ogus E. Push-out bond strength and SEM evaluation of new polymeric root canal fillings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:879–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Panzarini SR, Holland R, de Souza V, et al. Mineral trioxide aggregate as a root canal filling material in reimplanted teeth. Microscopic analysis in monkeys. Dent Traumatol. 2007;23:265–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Proroot (mineral trioxide aggregate) root canal repair material, 2011. Accessed 18 Mar 2011.
  20. Roberts HW, Toth JM, Berzins DW, Charlton DG. Mineral trioxide aggregate material use in endodontic treatment: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 2008;24:149–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saghiri MA, Shokouhinejad N, Lotfi M, Aminsobhani M, Saghiri AM. Push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate in the presence of alkaline pH. J Endod. 2010;36:1856–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schwartz R. Adhesive density and endodontics: part 2—bonding in the root canal system: the promise and the problems—a review. J Endod. 2006;32:125–34.Google Scholar
  23. Shokouhinejad N, Nekoofar MH, Iravani A, Kharrazifard MJ, Dummer PM. Effect of acidic environment on the push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2010;36:871–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skidmore LJ, Berzins DW, Bahcall JK. An in vitro comparison of the intraradicular dentine bond strength of Resilon and gutta-percha. J Endod. 2006;32:963–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sluyk SR, Moon PC, Hartwell GR. Evaluation of setting properties and retention characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a furcation perforation material. J Endod. 1998;24:768–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sousa-Neto MD, Marchesan MA, Pécora JD, et al. Effect of Er:YAG laser on adhesion of root canal sealers. J Endod. 2002;28:185–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stiegemeier D, Baumgartner JC, Ferracane J. Comparison of push-out bond strengths of Resilon with three different sealers. J Endod. 2010;36:318–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tagger M, Tagger E, Tjan AH, Bakland LK. Measurement of adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentine. J Endod. 2002;28:351–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ungor M, Onay EO, Orucoglu H. Push-out bond strengths: the Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha. Int Endod J. 2006;39:643–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vanderweele RA, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ. Effect of blood contamination on retention characteristics of MTA when mixed with different liquids. J Endod. 2006;32:421–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Paedodontics, Faculty of DentistryAdnan Menderes UniversityAydınTurkey
  2. 2.Private PracticeAydınTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Paedodontics, Faculty of DentistryKirikkale UniversityKirikkaleTurkey

Personalised recommendations