Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 9–13 | Cite as

Comparison of two computerised anaesthesia delivery systems: pain and pain-related behaviour in children during a dental injection

  • J. NieuwenhuizenEmail author
  • E. J. Hembrecht
  • I. H. A. Aartman
  • J. Krikken
  • J. S. J. Veerkamp
Original Scientific Article

Abstract

Aim

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is a difference in pain and distress response of the child when using two different computer-controlled local analgesic delivery systems, the Sleeper One® and the WAND®, and whether this was influenced by the anxiety level of the child.

Methods

This randomised controlled trial was conducted among 112 children (56 girls) aged 4–6 years (mean age 66 months, SD 9 months). All children needing at least one dental visit using local analgesia were randomly assigned to either the Sleeper One® or the WAND®.

Results

During the injection phase, children expressed the same amount of disruptive behaviour using the Sleeper One® or the WAND® (Mann–Whitney U test, p > 0.05). The average injection time of the Sleeper One® (mean 2.49 min, SD 0.56) was significantly shorter than that of the WAND® (mean 3.20 min, SD 0.61; Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

No significant difference was found in pain and distress reaction of the child between the WAND® and the Sleeper One®. The average delivery time of the Sleeper One® was shorter.

Keywords

Dental anxiety Local analgesia Computer-controlled local anaesthetic delivery system (CCLAD) Sleeper One® The WAND® 

References

  1. Baart JA, Brand HS. Local anaesthesia in dentistry. Hoboken: Wiley; 2008.Google Scholar
  2. Chapman HR, Kirby-Turner N. Visual/verbal analogue scale: examples of brief assessment method to aid management of child and adult patients in clinical practice. Br Dent J. 2002;193:447–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davey GC. Dental phobias and anxieties: evidence for conditioning process and modulation of a learned fear. Behav Res Ther. 1989;27:51–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA, van Korlaar I, Goodenough B. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain. 2001;93:173–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. International Association for the Study of Pain® (IASP®). Pain terms: a list with definitions and notes on usage. Pain. 1997;6:249–52.Google Scholar
  6. Locker D, Liddell A, Dempster L, Shapiro D. Age of onset of dental anxiety. J Dent Res. 1999;78:790–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Meechan J. Effective topical anesthetic agents and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2002;46:759–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Milestone scientific. The wand: computer controlled anesthesia delivery system (manual). 1998; 1–27.Google Scholar
  9. Roghani S, Duperon RF, Barochana N. Evaluating the efficacy of commonly used topical anesthetics. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21:197–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. ten Berge M, Veerkamp JSJ, Prins PJ. On the structure of childhood dental fear, using the dental subscale of the children’s fear survey schedule. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002a;3:73–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. ten Berge M, Veerkamp JS, Hoogstraten J, Prins PJ. Childhood dental fear in the Netherlands: prevalence and normative data. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002b;30:101–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Veerkamp JSJ, Gruythuysen RJM, van Amerongen WE, Hoogstraten J. Dentist’s ratings of child dental-patients’ anxiety. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1995;23:356–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Venham LL, Gaulin-Kremer E, Muster E, Bengston-Audia D, Cohan J. Interval rating scales for children’s dental anxiety and uncooperative behavior. Pediatr Dent. 1980;2:195–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Versloot J, Veerkamp JSJ, Hoogstraten J. Assessment of pain by the child, dentist, and independent observers. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26:445–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Versloot J, Veerkamp JSJ, Hoogstraten J. Computerized anaesthesia delivery systems versus traditional syringe: comparing pain and pain-related behaviour in children. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:488–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Versloot J, Veerkamp JSJ, Hoogstraten J. Children’s self-reported pain at the dentist. Pain. 2008;2:389–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Nieuwenhuizen
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • E. J. Hembrecht
    • 1
  • I. H. A. Aartman
    • 2
  • J. Krikken
    • 1
  • J. S. J. Veerkamp
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Paediatric DentistryAcademic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Social Dentistry and Behavioural SciencesAcademic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations