Journal of Arid Land

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 754–763 | Cite as

Effects of temperature on flowering phenological traits of Populus euphratica Oliv. and Populus pruinosa Schrenk populations, Xinjiang, China

  • Zhijun LiEmail author
  • Xiao Zhang
  • Yaqiong Zheng
  • Aijun Qiu
  • Ling Zhang


The aims of this study were to explore the interspecific differences of Populus euphratica Oliv. and Populus pruinosa Schrenk populations and the intraspecific differences of males and females within the same species in flowering phenological traits, and the effects of temperatures on flowering phenological traits in different growth years (2001–2003 and 2013–2015). The results showed that P. euphratica population flowered earlier than P. pruinosa population. Moreover, flowering phenological period of population, number of days of flowering phenological period per population, number of days of flowering phenological period per plant and average number of days of flowering period per plant of P. euphratica population were less than those of P. pruinosa population. The differences between male and female within the same species indicated that the flowering periods of males P. euphratica and P. pruinosa populations were earlier than those of female plants. For both species, flowering phenological traits were significantly and negatively correlated with the average temperatures in previous ten days, previous one month and previous three months of flowering. Both species are sensitive to temperature changes and adjust to the changes by advancing the start of flowering and prolonging the duration of flowering.


Populus euphratica Oliv Populus pruinosa Schrenk flowering phenology temperature flowering synchrony 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work was financially supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (30060007), the National Basic Research Program of China (2012CB723204) and the National Programs for Science and Technology Development of China (2013BAC10B01).


  1. Abe T. 2001. Flowering phenology, display size, and fruit set in an understory dioecious shrub, Aucuba japonica (Cornaceae). American Journal of Botany, 88(3): 455–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai J, Ge Q S, Dai J H. 2009. Response of woody plant phenophases to climate change for recent 30 years in Guiyang. Geographical Research, 28(6): 1606–1614. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. Bai J, Ge Q S, Dai J H. 2011. The response of first flowering dates to abrupt climate change in Beijing. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 28(3): 564–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell D R. 1989. Measurement of selection in a hermaphroditic plant: variation in male and female pollination success. Evolution, 43: 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang Z F, Han G F, Zhong S N. 2009. Relationships between phenology of 18 tree species and air temperature change in the Minqin desert area of china. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 33(2): 311–319. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Chmielewski F M, Rtzer T. 2001. Response of tree phenology to climate change across Europe. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 108: 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doi H. 2012. Response of the Morus bombycis growing season to temperature and its latitudinal pattern in Japan. International Journal of Biometeorology, 56(5): 895–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fan D Q, Zhao X S, Zhu W Q, et al. 2016. Review of influencing factors of accuracy of plant phenology monitoring based on remote sensing data. Progress in Geography, 35(3): 304–319. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitter A H, Fitter R S R. 2002. Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants. Science, 296: 165–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gonsamo A, Chen J M, Wu C Y. 2013. Citizen science: Linking the recent rapid advances of plant flowering in Canada with climate variability. Scientific Reports, 3: 2239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guitian J, Sanchez J M. 1992. Flowering phenology and fruit set of Petrocoptis grandiflora (Caryophyllaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences, 153: 409–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang W J, Ge Q S, Dai J H, et al. 2017. Sensitivity of first flowering dates to temperature change for typical woody plants in Guiyang City, China. Progress in Geography, 36(8): 1015–1024. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelly C A. 1992. Reproductive phenologies in Lobelia inflata (Lobeliaceae) and their environmental control. American Journal of Botany, 79: 1–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu J P, Zhou Z L, Li Z J, et al. 2004. A study on the spatial distribution and quantitive characteristic of Populus euphratica and Populus pruinosa flowers. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 24(3): 278–283. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Liu J P, Zhou Z L, Li Z J, et al. 2005. A study on the spatial distribution and quantative characteristic of Populus euphratica and Populis pruinosa fruits. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 25(3): 336–342. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Liu Z J, Yu J, Xu C Z, et al. 2002. Comparative studies on the chemical composition and vigour of pollens of Populus euphratica and Populus pruinosa. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 20(6): 453–456. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Lu P L, Yu Q, He Q T. 2006. Responses of plant phenology to climatic change. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26(3): 923–929. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Marquis R J. 1988. Phenological variation in the neotropical understory shrub Piper arieianum: causes and consequences. Ecology, 1552–1565.Google Scholar
  19. Maryamgul A, Alishir K, Umit H, et al. 2012. Phenological characteristics of female and male trees of Populus euphratica Oliv. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 26(10): 97–102. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Polgar C A, Primack R B. 2011. Leaf-out phenology of temperate woody plants: From trees to ecosystems. New Phytologist, 191(4): 926–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Primack R B. 1980. Variation in the phenology of natural populations of montane shrubs in New Zealand. Journal of Ecology, 68: 849–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rathcke B, Lacey E P. 1985. Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16: 179–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosenzweig C, Karoly D, Vicarelli M, et al. 2008. Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change. Nature, 453: 353–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Szabó B, Vincze E, Czúcz B. 2016. Flowering phonological changes in relation to climate change in Hungary. International Journal of Biometeorology, 60(9): 1347–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tarasjev A. 1997. Flowering phenology in natural populations of Iris pumila. Ecography, 20: 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tao Z X, Zhong S Y, Ge Q S, et al. 2017. Spatiotemporal variations in flowering duration of woody plants in China from 1963 to 2012. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(1): 53–63. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  27. Thomson J D. 1980. Skewed flowering distributions and pollinator attraction. Ecology, 61: 572–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang S J, Chen B H, Li H Q. 1995. Populus euphratica Forest. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 141–144. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Waser N M. 1978. Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wild flowers. Ecology, 59: 934–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Whitehead D R. 1983. Wind pollination: some ecological and evolutionary perspectives. In: Real L. Pollination Biology. Orlando: Academic Press, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xiao Y A, He P, Li X H. 2004. The flowering phenology and reproductive features of the endangered plant Disanthus cercidifolius var. Longipes H. T. Chang (Hamamelidaceae). Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24(1): 14–21. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  32. Xu Y J, Zhong S Y, Dai J H, et al. 2017. Changes in flowering phenology of plants and their model simulation in Mudanjiang, China. Geographical Research, 36(4): 779–789. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. Yang L T, Hou Q. 2008. Phenological changes of Populus simoniiand its relationship with meteorological conditions in the Eastern Inner Mongolia. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 24(6): 39–44. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  34. Zhang F C. 1995. Effects of global warming on plant phonological everts in china. Acta Geographica Sinica, 50(5): 403–408. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  35. Zhang H, Li J Q, Li J W, et al. 2007. The reproductive phonological rhythm characterisitics of Populus euphratica Oliv. population in the Ejina Oasis of inner Mongolia. Journal of Inner Momgolia Agricultural University, 28(2): 60–66. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  36. Zhang H X, Chen C M. 2001. Studies on flowering phenology of Clones in Pinus tabulaeformis seed orchard. Forest Research, 14(3): 288–296.Google Scholar
  37. Zhang X X, Ge Q S, Zheng J Y. 2004. Relationships between climate change and vegetation in Beijing using remote sensed data and phonological data. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 28(4): 499–506. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  38. Zheng J Y, Ge Q S, Hao Z X, et al. 2006. Spring phenophases in recent decades over eastern China and its possible link to climate changes. Climatic Change, 77: 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhou Z L, Li Z J, Gong W J, et al. 2005. Study on the flowering phenology in Populus euphratica and Populus pruinosa. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 23(2): 163–168. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhijun Li
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Xiao Zhang
    • 2
  • Yaqiong Zheng
    • 2
  • Aijun Qiu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ling Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Life SciencesTarim UniversityAralChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Biological Resource in Tarim BasinXinjiang Production & Construction GroupsAralChina

Personalised recommendations