Advertisement

Journal of Arid Land

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 43–57 | Cite as

Interaction between climate and management on beta diversity components of vegetation in relation to soil properties in arid and semi-arid oak forests, Iran

  • Heydari MehdiEmail author
  • Aazami Fatemeh
  • Faramarzi Marzban
  • Omidipour Reza
  • Bazgir Masoud
  • Pothier David
  • Prévosto Bernard
Article
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the interaction between regions with different climatic conditions (arid vs. semi-arid) and management (protected vs. unprotected) on the turnover and nestedness of vegetation in relation to physical, chemical and biological properties of soils in the Ilam Province of Iran. In each of the two regions, we sampled 8 sites (4 managed and 4 unmanaged sites) within each of which we established 4 circular plots (1000 m2) that were used to investigate woody species, while two micro-plots (1 m×1 m) were established in each 1000-m2 plot to analyze herbaceous species. In each sample unit, we also extracted three soil samples (0–20 cm depth) for measuring soil properties. The results indicated that the interaction between region and conservational management significantly affected the percent of canopy cover of Persian oak (Quercus brantii Linddl), soil respiration, substrate-induced respiration, as well as beta and gamma diversities and turnover of plant species. The percent of oak canopy cover was positively correlated with soil silt, electrical conductivity, available potassium, and alpha diversity, whereas it was negatively correlated with plant turnover. In addition, plant turnover was positively related to available phosphorus, while nestedness of species was positively related to organic carbon and total nitrogen. According to these results, we concluded that physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of limited ecological niche generally influenced plant diversity. Also, this study demonstrated the major contribution of the beta diversity on gamma diversity, especially in semi-arid region, because of the higher heterogeneity of vegetation in this area.

Keywords

climatic conditions conservation management beta diversity oak forests physical-chemical property semi-arid region 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Ilam University is kindly acknowledged for its financial support for this research work. We would like to thank Mr. Masoud HAMIDI for his guidance in soil analysis.

References

  1. Adler P B, Levine J M. 2007. Contrasting relationships between precipitation and species richness in space and time. Oikos, 116(2): 221–232.Google Scholar
  2. Alef K, Nannipieri P. 1995. Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. London: Academic Press, 576.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson J P E, Domsch K H. 1978. A Physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 10(3): 215–221.Google Scholar
  4. Arriaga L, Mercado C. 2004. Seed bank dynamics and tree-fall gaps in a northwestern Mexican Quercus-Pinus forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 15(5): 661–668.Google Scholar
  5. Auyeung D S N, Suseela V, Dukes J S. 2013. Warming and drought reduce temperature sensitivity of nitrogen transformations. Global Change Biology, 19(2): 662–676.Google Scholar
  6. Barnes B V, Zak D R, Spurr S H, et al. 1997. Forest Ecology. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc., 792.Google Scholar
  7. Baselga A. 2010. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19(1): 134–143.Google Scholar
  8. Baselga A, Orme C D L. 2012. Betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3(5): 808–812.Google Scholar
  9. Bationo A, Kihara J, Vanlauwe B, et al. 2007. Soil organic carbon dynamics, functions and management in West African agro-ecosystems. Agricultural Systems, 94(1): 13–25.Google Scholar
  10. Behbahani S M, Moradi M, Basiri R, et al. 2017. Sand mining disturbances and their effects on the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a riparian forest of Iran. Journal of Arid Land, 9(6): 837–849.Google Scholar
  11. Benítez A R, Prieto M, Aragón G. 2015. Large trees and dense canopies: key factors for maintaining high epiphytic diversity on trunk bases (bryophytes and lichens) in tropical montane forests. Forestry, 88(5): 521–527.Google Scholar
  12. Binkley D, Fisher R F. 2012. Ecology and Management of Forest Soils (4th ed.). New York: Wiley, 362.Google Scholar
  13. Black C A. 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part l. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, 545–566.Google Scholar
  14. Blake G R, Hartge K H. 1986. Bulk density. In: Klute A. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1—Physical and Mineralogy Methods (2nd ed.). Madison: Soil Science Society of America, 363–376.Google Scholar
  15. Bouyoucos G J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. American Society of Agronomy Journal, 54(5): 44–46.Google Scholar
  16. Brady N C, Weil R R. 2008. The Nature and Properties of Soils (14th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 975.Google Scholar
  17. Bray R H, Kurtz L T. 1945. Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science, 59(1): 39–45.Google Scholar
  18. Bremner J M. 1996. Nitrogen—Total. In: In: Sparks D L, Page A L, Helmke P A, et al. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3—Chemical Methods. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, 1085–1122.Google Scholar
  19. Caldeira M C, Ibáñez I, Nogueira C, et al. 2014. Direct and indirect effects of tree canopy facilitation in the recruitment of Mediterranean oaks. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(2): 349–35.Google Scholar
  20. Calderón-Patrón J M, Moreno C E, Pineda-López R, et al. 2013. Vertebrate dissimilarity due to turnover and richness differences in a highly beta-diverse region: the role of spatial grain size, dispersal ability and distance. PLoS ONE, 8(12): e82905.Google Scholar
  21. Celik I. 2005. Land-use effects on organic matter and physical properties of soil in a southern mediterranean highland of Turkey. Soil and Tillage Research, 83(2): 270–277.Google Scholar
  22. Chase J M, Leibold M A. 2002. Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship. Nature, 416(6879): 427–430.Google Scholar
  23. Chaudhari P R, Ahire D V, Ahire V D, et al. 2013. Soil bulk density as related to soil texture, organic matter content and available total nutrients of coimbatore soil. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(2): 1–8.Google Scholar
  24. Chávez V, Macdonald S E. 2012. Partitioning vascular understory diversity in mixed wood boreal forests: The importance of mixed canopies for diversity conservation. Forest Ecology and Management, 271: 19–26.Google Scholar
  25. Cheng F, Peng X, Zhao P, et al. 2013. Soil microbial biomass, basal respiration and enzyme activity of main forest types in the Qinling Mountains. PLoS ONE, 8(6): e67353.Google Scholar
  26. Coetzee B W T, Gaston K J, Chown S L. 2014. Local scale comparisons of biodiversity as a test for global protected area ecological performance: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 9(8): e105824.Google Scholar
  27. Cox R L, Underwood E C. 2011. The importance of conserving biodiversity outside of protected areas in Mediterranean ecosystems. PLoS ONE, 6(1): e14508.Google Scholar
  28. Crist T O, Veech J A, Gering J C, et al. 2003. Partitioning species diversity across landscapes and regions: a hierarchical analysis of α, β, and γ diversity. The American Naturalist, 162(6): 734–743.Google Scholar
  29. Dahlgren R A, Horwath W R, Tate K W, et al. 2003. Blue oak enhance soil quality in California oak woodlands. California Agriculture, 57(2): 42–47.Google Scholar
  30. Erfanzadeh R, Omidipour R, Faramarzi M. 2015. Variation of plant diversity components in different scales in relation to grazing and climatic conditions. Plant Ecology & Diversity, 8(4): 537–545.Google Scholar
  31. Eycott A E, Watkinson A R, Dolman P M. 2006. Ecological patterns of plant diversity in a plantation forest managed by clearfelling. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43(6): 1160–1171.Google Scholar
  32. Famiglietti J, Rudnicki J, Rodell M. 1998. Variability in surface moisture content along a hillslope transect: rattlesnake Hill, Texas. Journal of Hydrology, 210(1–4): 259–281.Google Scholar
  33. Fathizadeh O, Hosseini S M, Zimmermann A, et al. 2017. Estimating linkages between forest structural variables and rainfall interception parameters in semi-arid deciduous oak forest stands. Science of the Total Environment, 601–602: 1824–1837.Google Scholar
  34. Feng C, Ma Y, Fu S, et al. 2017. Soil carbon and nutrient dynamics following cessation of anthropogenic disturbances in degraded subtropical forests. Land Degradation & Development, 28(8): 2457–2467.Google Scholar
  35. Frossard E, Condorn L M, Oberson A, et al. 2000. Processes governing phosphorus availability in temperate soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29(1): 15–23.Google Scholar
  36. Harrison S, Davies K F, Saford H D, et al. 2006. Beta diversity and the scale-dependence of the productivity–diversity relationship: a test in the Californian serpentine flora. Journal of Ecology, 94(1): 110–117.Google Scholar
  37. Hermy M, Verheyen K. 2007. Legacies of the past in the present-day forest biodiversity: a review of past land-use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity. Ecological Research, 22(3): 361–371.Google Scholar
  38. Heydari M, Poorbabaei H, Esmaelzade O, et al. 2013a. Germination characteristics and diversity of soil seed banks and above-ground vegetation in disturbed and undisturbed oak forests. Forest Ecosystems (Forest Science and Practice), 15(4): 286–301.Google Scholar
  39. Heydari M, Poorbabaei H, Salehi A, et al. 2013b. Application of two-step clustering methods to investigate effects of oak forests conservative management of Ilam city on soil properties. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 21(2): 329–343.Google Scholar
  40. Heydari M, Poorbabaei H, Bazgir M, et al. 2014. Earthworms as indicators for different forest management types and human disturbance in llam oak forest, Iran. Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A, 56(3): 121–134.Google Scholar
  41. Heydari M, Pourbabaei H, Esmailzadeh O. 2015. The effects of habitat characteristics and human destructions on understory plant species biodiversity and soil in Zagros forest ecosystem. Journal of Plant Researches, 28(3): 535–548.Google Scholar
  42. Heydari M, Faramarzi M, Pothier D. 2016. Post-fire recovery of herbaceous species composition and diversity, and soil quality indicators one year after wildfire in a semi-arid oak woodland. Ecological Engineering, 94: 688–697.Google Scholar
  43. Heydari M, Omidipour R, Abedi M, et al. 2017. Effects of fire disturbance on alpha and beta diversity and on beta diversity components of soil seed banks and aboveground vegetation. Plant Ecology and Evolution, 150(3): 247–256.Google Scholar
  44. Kalra Y P, Maynard D G. 1991. Methods manual for forest soil and plant analysis. Forestery Canada, Northwest Region, Northern Forgery Centre. Edmonton, Alberta. Information Report. NOR-X-311.Google Scholar
  45. Kardol P, Cregger M A, Campany C E, et al. 2010. Soil ecosystem functioning under climate change: plant species and community effects. Ecology, 91(3): 767–781.Google Scholar
  46. Kidron G J, Gutschick V P. 2013. Soil moisture correlates with shrub-grass association in the Chihuahuan Desert. Catena, 107: 71–79.Google Scholar
  47. Kooch Y, Jalilvand H, Bahmanyar M A, et al. 2007. Ecological distribution of Indicator species and effective edaphical factors on the northern Iran lowland forests. Journal of Applied Science, 7(11): 1475–1483.Google Scholar
  48. Lafage D, Maugenest S, Bouzille J B, et al. 2015. Disentangling the influence of local and landscape factors on alpha and beta diversities: opposite response of plants and ground-dwelling arthropods in wet meadows. Ecological Research, 30(6): 1025–1035.Google Scholar
  49. LaManna J A, Blote R T, Burkle L A, et al. 2017. Negative density dependence mediates biodiversity–productivity relationships across scales. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1: 1107–1115.Google Scholar
  50. Lande R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos, 76(1): 5–13.Google Scholar
  51. Li Y, Zhao H, Zhao X, et al. 2011. Effects of grazing and livestock exclusion on soil physical and chemical properties in desertified sandy grassland, Inner Mongolia, northern China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 63(4): 771–783.Google Scholar
  52. Mekuria W, Aynekulu E. 2013. Exclosure land management for restoration of the soils in degraded communal grazing lands in northern Ethiopia. Land Degradation & Development, 24(6): 528–538.Google Scholar
  53. Mirzaei J, Moradi M. 2017. Relationships between flora biodiversity, soil physiochemical properties, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) diversity in a semi-arid forest. Plant Ecology and Evolution, 150(2): 151–159.Google Scholar
  54. Miura S, Yoshinaga S, Yamada T. 2003. Protective effect of floor cover against soil erosion on steep slopes forested with Chamaecyparis obtusa (hinoki) and other species. Journal of Forest Research, 8(1): 27–35.Google Scholar
  55. Mohadjer M M. 2005. Silviculture. Tehran: Tehran University Press, 387.Google Scholar
  56. Moradi M, Imani F, Naji H R, et al. 2017. Variation in soil carbon stock and nutrient content in sand dunes after afforestation by prosopis juliflora in the Khuzestan province (Iran). Forest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 10(3): 585–589.Google Scholar
  57. Moreno G, Obrador J J, Garcia A. 2007. Impact of evergreen oaks on soil fertility and crop production in intercropped dehesas. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 119(3–4): 270–280.Google Scholar
  58. Nelson D W, Sommers L E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Sparks D L, Page A L, Helmke P A, et al. Methods of Soil Analysis: part 3—Chemical Methods. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, 961–1010.Google Scholar
  59. Onyekwelu J C, Mosandl R, Stimm B. 2006. Productivity, site evaluation and state of nutrition of Gmelina arborea plantations in Oluwa and Omo forest reserves. Forest Ecology and Management, 229(1–3): 214–227.Google Scholar
  60. Pan Y X, Wang X P, Li X R, et al. 2014. The influence of Caragana korshinskii shrub on soil and hydrological properties in a revegetation-tabilized desert ecosystem. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59(10): 1925–1934.Google Scholar
  61. Parma R, Jouybari S S. 2010. Impact of physiographic and human factors on crown cover and diversity of woody species in the Zagros forests (Case study: Ghalajeh forests, Kermanshah province). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 18(4): 539–555.Google Scholar
  62. Qiu S, McComb A J, Bell R W, et al. 2005. Response of soil microbial activity to temperature, moisture, and litter leaching on a wetland transect during seasonal refilling. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 13(1): 43–54.Google Scholar
  63. R Core Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  64. Raunkiaer C. 1934. The Life Forms of Plant and Statistical Plant Geography. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 721.Google Scholar
  65. Sabatini F M, Burrascano S, Tuomisto H, et al. 2014. Ground layer plant species turnover and beta diversity in Southern-European Old-Growth Forests. PLoS ONE, 9(4): e95244.Google Scholar
  66. Sagheb-Talebi K S, Sajedi T, Pourhashemi M. 2014. Forests of Iran. New York: Springer Netherlands, 149.Google Scholar
  67. Salehi A, Söderberg U, Eriksson L O, et al. 2013. Impacts of forest-based activities on woodland characteristics. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11(2): 161–176.Google Scholar
  68. Sardans J, Peñuelas J. 2005. Drought decreases soil enzyme activity in a Mediterranean Quercus ilex L. forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37(3): 455–461.Google Scholar
  69. Sardans J, Peñuelas J. 2007. Drought changes phosphorus and potassium accumulation patterns in an evergreen Mediterranean forest. Functional Ecology, 21(2): 191–201.Google Scholar
  70. Savadogo P, Sawadogo L, Tiveau T. 2007. Effects of grazing intensity and prescribed fire on soil physical and hydrological properties and pasture yield in the savanna woodlands of Burkina Faso. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environments, 118(1–4): 80–92.Google Scholar
  71. Schulze E D, Aas D, Grimm G W, et al. 2016. A review on plant diversity and forest management of European beech forests. European Journal of Forest Research, 135(1): 51–67.Google Scholar
  72. Sheklabadi M, Khademi H, Eghbal M K, et al. 2007. Effects of climate and long-term grazing exclusion on selected soil biological quality indicators rangelands of Central Zagros. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 11(41): 103–116.Google Scholar
  73. Stegen J C, Freestone A L, Crist T O, et al. 2013. Stochastic and deterministic drivers of spatial and temporal turnover in breeding bird communities. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 22(2): 202–212.Google Scholar
  74. Steinweg J M, Dukes J S, Paul E A, et al. 2013. Microbial responses to multi-factor climate change: effects on soil enzymes. Frontier in Microbiology, 146: 1–11.Google Scholar
  75. Strandberg B, Kristiansen S M, Tybirk K. 2005. Dynamic oak-scrub to forest succession: effects of management on understorey vegetation, humus forms and soils. Forest Ecology and Management, 211(3): 318–328.Google Scholar
  76. Sumner M E, Miller W P. 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In: Sparks D L. Methods of Soil Analysis: part 3—Chemical Properties. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, 1201–1230.Google Scholar
  77. Tang Z, Fang J, Sun J, et al. 2011. Effectiveness of protected areas in maintaining plant production. PLoS ONE, 6: e19116.Google Scholar
  78. Tárrega R, Calvo L, Taboada Á, et al. 2009. Abandonment and management in spanish dehesa systems: Effects on soil features and plant species richness and composition. Forest Ecology and Management, 257(2): 731–738.Google Scholar
  79. Tessema Z K, de Boer W F, Baars R M T, et al. 2011. Changes in soil nutrients, vegetation structure and herbaceous biomass in response to grazing in a semi-arid savanna of Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Environments, 75(7): 662–670.Google Scholar
  80. Tilman D, Lehman C. 2001. Human-caused environmental change: impacts on plant diversity and evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(10): 5433–5440.Google Scholar
  81. Toure T, Ge J W, Zhou J W. 2015. Interactions between soil characteristics, environmental factors, and plant species abundance: A case study in the Karst Mountains of Longhushan Nature Reserve, southwest China. Journal of Mountain Science, 12(4): 943–960.Google Scholar
  82. van der Putten W H, Bardgett R D, Bever J D, et al. 2013. Plant-soil feedbacks: the past, the present and future challenges. Journal of Ecology, 101(2): 265–276.Google Scholar
  83. Veech J A, Crist T O. 2007. Habitat and climate heterogeneity maintain beta-diversity of birds among landscapes within ecoregions. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16(5): 650–656.Google Scholar
  84. von Lützow M, Kögel-Knabner I. 2009. Temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition-What do we know? Biology and Fertility of Soils, 46(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  85. Wang G, Zhou Y, Xu X, et al. 2013. Temperature sensitivity of soil organic carbon mineralization along an elevation gradient in the Wuyi Mountains, China. PLoS ONE, 8(1): e53914.Google Scholar
  86. Wang P, Sun R, Hu J, et al. 2007. Measurements and simulation of forest leaf area index and net primary productivity in Northern china. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(3): 607–615.Google Scholar
  87. Wilson S, Tilman D D. 2002. Quadratic variation in old-field species richness along gradients of disturbance and nitrogen. Ecology, 83(2): 492–504.Google Scholar
  88. Yacht A L V, Barrioz S A, Keyser P D, et al. 2017. Vegetation response to canopy disturbance and season of burn during oak woodland and savanna restoration in Tennessee. Forest Ecology and Management, 390: 187–202.Google Scholar
  89. Zemunik G, Turner B L, Lambers H, et al. 2016. Increasing plant species diversity and extreme species turnover accompany declining soil fertility along a long-term chronosequence in a biodiversity hotspot. Journal of Ecology, 104(3): 792–805.Google Scholar
  90. Zhang Y, Zhang S, Ma K, et al. 2014. Woody species diversity in forest plantations in a mountainous region of Beijing, China: effects of sampling scale and species selection. PLoS ONE, 9(12): e115038.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© China Science Publishing Media Ltd. (Science Press) and Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heydari Mehdi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aazami Fatemeh
    • 1
  • Faramarzi Marzban
    • 2
  • Omidipour Reza
    • 3
  • Bazgir Masoud
    • 4
  • Pothier David
    • 5
  • Prévosto Bernard
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Forest Science, College of AgricultureIlam UniversityIlamIran
  2. 2.Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, College of AgricultureIlam UniversityIlamIran
  3. 3.Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, College of Natural Resources and Earth SciencesShahrekord UniversityShahrekordIran
  4. 4.Department of Soil Science, College of AgricultureIlam UniversityIlamIran
  5. 5.Department of Wood and Forest Sciences, Centre for Forest ResearchLaval UniversityQuebecCanada
  6. 6.Irstea-National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and AgricultureAix-en-ProvenceFrance

Personalised recommendations