- 64 Downloads
In principle, intellectual property right-holders should indemnify ISPs against their compliance costs when an injunction is obtained against them to prevent the use of their facilities by wrongdoers for unlawful purposes.
Such indemnity must be limited to reasonable compliance costs.
Furthermore, it is crucial that the intermediary in question is legally innocent – that it acts as a “mere conduit”.
Different considerations may apply to intermediaries engaging in caching or hosting governed by Arts. 13 and 14 of the E-Commerce Directive, because these operations involve a greater degree of participation in the infringement, which is more likely to infringe national laws protecting intellectual property rights if the conditions of immunity are not satisfied. That must, however, depend on the precise facts and on the relevant provisions of national law.