Advertisement

E-sport and the EU: the view from the English Bridge Union

  • Cem Abanazir
Article

Abstract

The change that e-sport is going through and the ever-ascending trajectory of e-sport has led to certain states to regulate this mode of entertainment. States like South Korea and China have taken one-step further and recognised e-sport as sport. This article deals with the question of recognition of e-sport by the European Union as sport. In that, characteristics of e-sport vis-à-vis mainstream sports will be analysed alongside the relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The physical element and social function of sport which have come to the forefront in case law and academic debates are relevant to the question of e-sport’s status as a sport. Moving on from that premise, the article will conclude that while e-sport may satisfy the physical element in certain play modes, its currently weak social function would render it as just an economic activity in the eyes of the European Union. Nevertheless, particularities of e-sport due to its virtual element, intellectual property-based means of production and diversified means of playing should be taken into account when the time comes for a definite judgement on e-sport’s status as sport.

Keywords

E-sport Elements of sport Physical element Social function 

Notes

References

  1. Abanazir C (2018) Institutionalisation in e-sports. Sport Ethics Philos.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2018.1453538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams A, Piekarz M (2015) Sport events and human rights: positive promotion or negative erosion? J Policy Res Tour Leis Events 7(3):220–236.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2014.997864 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adamus T (2012) Playing computer games as electronic sport: in search of a theoretical framework for a new research field. In: Fromme J, Unger A (eds) Computer games and new media cultures: a handbook of digital games studies. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 477–490.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2777-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell JB (1987) To play the game: an analysis of sports. Transaction Books, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  5. Borowy M, Jin DY (2013) Pioneering eSport: the experience economy and the marketing of early 1980s arcade gaming contests. Int J Commun 7:2254–2274Google Scholar
  6. Boyle EA, Connoly TM, Hainey T, Boyle JM (2012) Engagement in digital entertainment games: a systematic review. Comput Hum Behav 28:771–780.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crogan P (2011) Gameplay mode: war, simulation, and technoculture. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dimitrakopoulos DG (2006) More than a market? The regulation of sport in the European Union. Gov Oppos 41(4):561–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forster J (2006) Global sports organisations and their governance. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc 6(1):72–83.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700610649481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Funk DC, Pizzo AD, Baker BJ (2018) eSport management: embracing eSport education and research opportunities. Sport Manag Rev 21:7–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gee JP (2004) What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Gleaves J, Llewellyn M (2014) Ethics, nationalism, and the imagined community: the case against inter-national sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 41(1):1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2013.785427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gunter B (2016) Does playing video games make players more violent?. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heere B (2018) Embracing the sportification of society: defining e-sports through a polymorphic view on sport. Sport Manag Rev 21:21–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hemphill D (2005) Cybersport. J Philos Sport 32(2):195–207.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2005.9714682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holden JT, Kaburakis A, Rodenberg R (2017) The future is now: eSports policy considerations and potential litigation. Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport 27:46–78.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jlas.2016-0018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holden JT, Kabourakis A, Tweedie JW (2018) Virtue(al) games—real drugs. Sport Ethics Philos.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2018.1459814 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holt J (2016) Virtual domains for sports and games. Sport Ethics Philos 10(1):5–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2016.1163729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hutchins B (2008) Signs of meta-change in second modernity: the growth of e-sport and the World Cyber Games. New Media Soc 10(6):851–869.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808096248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jenny SE, Manning RD, Kepier MC, Olrich TW (2016) Virtual(ly) athletes: where eSports fit within the definition of “sport”. Quest 69:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2016.1144517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jenny SE, Keiper MC, Taylor BJ, Williams DP, Gawrysiak J, Manning RD, Tutka PM (2018) eSports venues: a new sport business opportunity. J Appl Sport Manag 10:34–49.  https://doi.org/10.18666/JASM-2018-V10-I1-8469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jin DY (2010) Korea’s online gaming empire. MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson M (2016) Bullet hell: the globalized growth of Danmaku games and the digital culture of high scores and world records. In: Pulos A, Lee SA (eds) Transnational contexts of culture, gender, class, and colonialism in play: video games in East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, ChamGoogle Scholar
  24. Jonasson K, Thiborg J (2010) Electronic sport and its impact on future sport. Sport Soc 13:287–299.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17430430903522996 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karhulahti V-M (2017) Reconsidering eSport: economics and executive ownership. Phys Cult Sport 74:43–53.  https://doi.org/10.1515/pcssr-2017-0010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelly SM, Sigmon KA (2018) The key to key presses: eSports game input streaming and copyright protection. Interact Entertain Law Rev 1(1):2–16.  https://doi.org/10.4337/ielr.2018.01.01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klevjer R, Hovden JA (2017) The structure of videogame preference. Int J Comput Game Res 17(2). http://gamestudies.org/1702/articles/klevjer_hovden. Accessed 09 Sept 2018
  28. Koller D (2010) Introduction to the 2010 Amateur Sports Symposium. Univ Baltim Law Rev 40:573–574Google Scholar
  29. Lindholm J (2010) Case C -325/08, Olympique Lyonnais SASP v. Olivier Bernard and Newcastle United UFC, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 16 March 2010. Common Mark Law Rev 47:1187–1197Google Scholar
  30. Marcano B (2016) Características sociológicas de videojugadores online y el e-sport. El caso de Call of duty [Sociological characteristics of online video game players and e-sport. The case of Call of Duty] Pedagogía Social. Rev Interuniv 19:113–124Google Scholar
  31. Parrish R (2003) Sports law and policy in the European Union. Manchester University Press, ManchesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parrish R (2011) Social dialogue in European professional football. European Law Journal 17:213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parry J (2018) E-sports are not sports. Sport Ethics Philos.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2018.1489419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pijetlovic K (2017) EU sports law: a uniform algorithm for regulatory rules. Int Sports Law J 17:86–100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-017-0114-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosell M (2017) eSport gaming: the rise of a new sports practice. Sport Ethics Philos 11(4):464–476.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2017.1318947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rowe D (2004) Sport, media and culture: the unruly trinity, 2nd edn. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  37. Schauer F (1991) Playing by the rules: a philosophical examination of rule-based decision-making in law and in life. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Squire K (2011) Video games and learning: teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor TL (2012) Raising the stakes: E-sports and the professionalization of computer gaming. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Tong BAJW (2017) A new player has entered the game: immigration reform for esports players. Jeffrey S Moorad Sports Law J 24:351–386Google Scholar
  41. Trepte S, Reinecke L, Juechems K (2012) The social side of gaming: how playing online computer games creates online and offline social support. Comput Hum Behav 28:832–839.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Hilvoorde I, Pot N (2016) Embodiment and fundamental motor skills in eSports. Sport Ethics Philos 10:14–27.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2016.1159246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wagner MG (2006) On the scientific relevance of eSports. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220968200_On_the_Scientific_Relevance_of_eSports. Accessed 09 Sept 2018
  44. Weatherill S (2003) “Fair Play Please!”: recent developments in the application of EC law to sport. Common Mark Law Rev 40:51–93Google Scholar
  45. Weatherill S (2010) The Olivier Bernard case: how, if at all, to fix compensation for training young players? In: Weatherill S (2014) European Union Sports Law: collected papers, 2nd edn. TMC Asser Press, The Hague, pp 485–496Google Scholar
  46. Weatherill S (2017) Principles and practice in EU sports law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  47. Witkowski E (2012) On the digital playing field: how we ‘‘do sport’’ with networked computer games. Games Cult 7:349–374.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412012454222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Instituut 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LawUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations