Advertisement

The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 543–562 | Cite as

Development and Validation of a Self-regulated Language Learning Inventory

  • Myunghwan Hwang
  • Hee-Kyung LeeEmail author
Regular Article

Abstract

This study aims to develop and validate the Scale of Self-Regulated Language Learning (S2RLL), intended to measure high school students’ self-regulated language learning skills such as grit, self-efficacy, goal orientations, and language learning strategies. A total of 1281 Korean high school students participated in this study. Various evidence for S2RLL validity was collected from these participants. Results from a field expert panel rating agreement and the Rasch analysis offered evidence for content validity. The Rasch analysis also provided evidence for response validity. Internal structure-related evidence for validity was obtained by applying both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and calculating various reliability indices. Lastly, evidence for criterion validity was gained by comparing results from S2RLL with those of other instruments that measure constructs similar to S2RLL. We found that S2RLL items appropriately reflected self-regulated language learning skills. From a psychometric perspective, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of shared item variance supported the valid internal structure of S2RLL. Moreover, the Rasch analysis offered evidence for the appropriateness of the 5-point Likert scale used by respondents to respond to S2RLL items. Finally, the sub-scales of S2RLL showed moderate to high correlations with those of other scales related to self-regulation. Thus, S2RLL has the potential to help evaluate applicants’ SRL for second language learning. In addition, we make several suggestions for future research in this area.

Keywords

Self-regulated language learning Grit Self-efficacy Goal orientations Language learning strategies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by the Yonsei University Future-leading Research Initiative of 2015 (2016-22-0094).

References

  1. Afifi, A., May, S. A., & Clark, V. A. (2012). Practical multivariate analysis. NW: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and function. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Brain and Motivation Research Institute. (2012). Student motivation in the learning environment scales. Retrieved from https://bmri.korea.ac.kr/korean/research/assessment_scales/list.html?id=assessment.
  6. Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  7. Cho, S. W., & Kim, A. Y. (1998). The relationship between goal orientations, the use of self-regulated learning strategies and self-efficacy of elementary school children. Journal of Educational Studies, 27, 71–88.Google Scholar
  8. Crowley, S. L., & Fan, X. (1997). Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applicants in personality assessment research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(3), 508–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dornyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the short grit scale (Grit-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(3), 166–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gore, P. A., Jr. (2006). Academic self-efficacy as a predictor of college outcomes: Two incremental validity studies. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 92–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffiths, C. (2008). Strategies and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 83–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Han, J. H., & Ihm, H. J. (2011). Effects of digital English textbook-based blended learning on reading achievement and self-directed learning ability. Modern English Education, 12(3), 384–405.Google Scholar
  19. Hong, S. H. (2008). The effects of self-regulated learning strategy training on middle school students' attitude of learning and English academic achievement. Secondary Education Research, 56(2), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.Google Scholar
  21. Hwang, M. H. (2017). A study on the relations between grit, self-efficacy, and language proficiency among Korean high school students. English Language Teaching, 29(2), 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hwang, M. H., Lee, H. K. (2018). Grit factor structure and the impact of goal-specific grit on Korean high school students’ English achievement. English Language Teaching, 30(3), 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jang, S. Y., Kim, H. J., & Choi, S. (2013). Validating an English reading motivation scale using the Rasch measurement model. English Language Teaching, 25(3), 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jang, S. Y., & Lee, S. Y. (2013). Validation of a survey instrument for grammar learning strategy of college students. Studies on English Language and Literature, 39(4), 253–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jeon, J. Y. (2011). The effect of self-regulated learning ability components on English performance. Journal of Language Sciences, 18(4), 145–168.Google Scholar
  26. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kim, Y. S. (2011). The prediction of language assessment and relationship with achievement goal, motivation, and foreign language anxiety in the classroom. The New Korean Journal of English Language and Literature, 53(2), 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim, A. Y., & Park, I. Y. (2001). Construction and validation of academic self-efficacy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 39(1), 95–123.Google Scholar
  29. Kim, D. H., Wang, C., Ahn, H. S., & Bong, M. M. (2015). English language learners' self-efficacy profiles and relationship with self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 136–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim, M. S., & Seol, H. S. (2007). A study for validation of critical thinking disposition test using rasch measurement model. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 20(2), 101–124.Google Scholar
  31. Lee, I. S., Hong, S. H., & Shin, E. K. (2007). Rasch rating scale modeling of the disability identity scale. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 59(4), 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, M. B. (2008). Students' differences in self-regulated learning: EFL achievement and gender. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 123–140.Google Scholar
  33. Lee, S. D. (2011). Analysis of English major college students' self-regulated learning and learning flow. Journal of Language Sciences, 18(2), 133–149.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, S. J. (2012). The relationship of academic self-efficacy, task value, achievement goal, academic efforts and cognitive strategies to English academic achievement between middle and high school students in Korea. The Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 103–124.Google Scholar
  35. Lim, H. J., & Lee, J. E. (2014). Structural relationships among self-determination, goal orientations, and English learning outcomes in college students. The Journal of Education, 34(2), 91–114.Google Scholar
  36. Linacre, J. M. (2009). A user’s guide to winstep Rasch model computer programs. Retrieved from https://www.winsteps.com/winman/copyright.htm.
  37. Magno, C. (2009). Developing and assessing self-regulated learners. The Assessment Handbook: Continuing Education Program, 1, 26–41.Google Scholar
  38. Martirossian, A., & Hartoonian, A. (2015). Lowering foreign language anxiety through self-regulated learning strategy use. English Language Teaching, 8(12), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moon, E. S., Lee, J. H., & Kim, M. H. (2012). The relationship between self-regulated learning and English academic achievement of high school students. Modern Studies in English Language and Literature, 56(1), 109–126.Google Scholar
  40. Oh, S. N., & Shin, G. G. (2006). A case study of the effect of portfolio assessment on self-regulated English learning. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 6(4), 961–983.Google Scholar
  41. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ryu, J. Y. (2017). The effects of digital textbooks on college EFL learners' self-regulated learning. Multimedia-assisted language learning, 20(4), 99–126.Google Scholar
  47. Sahin Kizil, A., & Savran, Z. (2016). Self-regulated learning in the digital age: An EFL perspective. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 10(2), 147–158.Google Scholar
  48. Seol, H. S. (2007). A study for validation of scores for instruction evaluation questionnaires using rasch measurement model. Journal of Educational evaluation, 20(4), 31–51.Google Scholar
  49. Strayhorn, T. L. (2014). What role does grit play in the academic success of black male collegians at predominantly white institutions? Journal of African American Studies, 18(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tseng, W.-T., Drnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 78–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tseng, W.-T., Liu, H., & Nix, J.-M. (2017). Self-regulation in language learning: scale validation and gender effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 124(2), 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang, C., Hu, J., Zhang, G., Chang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2012). Chinese college students' self-regulated learning strategies and self-efficacy beliefs in learning English as a foreign language. Journal of Research in Education, 22(2), 103–135.Google Scholar
  53. Wang, C., & Pape, S. (2005). Self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulated learning strategies in learning English as a second language: Four case studies. The CATESOL Journal, 17(1), 76–90.Google Scholar
  54. Wang, C., Schwab, G., Fenn, P., & Chang, M. (2013). Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies for English language learners: Comparison between Chinese and German college students. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 173–191.Google Scholar
  55. Weinstein, C. E., Schulte, A., & Palmer, D. R. (1987). The learning and study strategies inventory. Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.Google Scholar
  56. Yang, M. H., & Cheong, Y. S. (2013). Development of self-regulated learning scale: integrated with motivational and emotional regulation. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 20(12), 239–266.Google Scholar
  57. Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9, 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yonsei UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations