Advertisement

Building Assessments for Self-Efficacy in English Public Speaking in China

  • Xue ZhangEmail author
  • Yuliya Ardasheva
  • Joy Egbert
  • Sarah C. Ullrich-French
Regular Article

Abstract

Due to globalization, an increasing need for advanced speaking skills, and the interest aroused by English public speaking (EPS) competitions, EPS is increasingly important, especially among university students. Although self-efficacy is strongly associated with performance, no psychometrically sound instruments to measure EPS self-efficacy among college-level learners have been developed to date. Grounded in Bandura’s self-efficacy theory, the present study established validity (content and construct) and reliability (scale and item) evidence for two new instruments: the EPS Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES) and the Sources of EPS Self-Efficacy Scale (SSES). Results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in Sample A (n = 406) confirmed the hypothesized EPS competency-related self-efficacy gaged by ESES. Results in Sample B (n = 270) supported four sources of EPS self-efficacy as gaged by SSES. Correlation analyses in Sample C (n = 263) contributed to the refinement of self-efficacy theory within the EPS domain. The two new measures will help practitioners gage their students’ EPS self-efficacy and its development and enable future investigations of the role EPS self-efficacy plays in language learning.

Keywords

English public speaking Self-efficacy Factor analysis Correlational analysis English language learners 

Notes

References

  1. American Management Association. (2012). Critical skills surveys. https://playbook.amanet.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/2012-Critical-Skills-Survey-pdf.pdf.
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self- efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for creating self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: IAP-Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chao, C. N. G., Mclnerney, D. M., & Bai, B. (2018). Self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of language learning achievements in an Asian bilingual context. The Asia–Pacific Education Researcher.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0420-3 Google Scholar
  6. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  7. Derrick, D. J. (2016). Instrument reporting practices in second language research. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang, F. (2018). Ideology and identity debate of English in China: Past, present and future. Asian Englishes, 20(1), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finch, W. H., Immekus, J. C., & French, B. F. (2016). Applied psychometrics using SPSS and AMOS. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Fryer, L. K., & Ainley, M. (2017). Supporting interest in a study domain: A longitudinal test of the interplay between interest, utility-value, and competence beliefs. Learning and Instruction.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.11.002.Google Scholar
  11. Fryer, L. K., & Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q. (2017). One more reason to learn a new language: Testing academic self-efficacy transfer at junior high school. Frontline Learning Research, 5(4), 61–75.  https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i4.301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fryer, L. K., Ainley, M., & Thompson, A. (2016). Modelling the links between students’ interest in a domain, the tasks they experience and their interest in a course: Isn’ t interest what university is all about? Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 157–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, Y., & Wang, C. (2010). An empirical study of reading self-efficacy and the use of reading strategies in the Chinese EFL context. Asian EFL Journal, 12(2), 144–162.Google Scholar
  16. Li, Y., Gao, Y., & Zhang, D. (2016). To speak like a TED speaker: A case study of TED motivated English public speaking study in EFL teaching. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lucas, S. E. (2013). English public speaking and the cultivation of talents for Chinese college students. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 124–139.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reio, T. G., Jr., & Shuck, B. (2015). Exploratory factor analysis: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 17(1), 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schreiber, L. M., Paul, G. D., & Shibley, L. R. (2012). The development and test of the public speaking competence rubric. Communication Education, 61(3), 205–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shah, P. M., Mahmud, W. H., Din, R., Yusof, A., & Pardi, K. M. (2011). Self-efficacy in the writing of Malaysian ESL learners. World Applied Sciences Journal, 15, 8–11.Google Scholar
  22. Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2016). A questionnaire-based validation of multidimensional models of self-regulated learning strategies. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 674–701.  https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thompson, B., & Daniel, L. G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(2), 197–208.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056002001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vafaee, P., Suzuki, Y., & Kachisnke, I. (2017). Validating grammaticality judgment tests: Evidence from two new psycholinguistic measures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 59–95.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wei, R., & Su, J. (2015). Surveying the English language across China. World Englishes, 34(2), 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang, X., & Ardasheva, Y. (2019). Sources of college EFL learners’ self-efficacy in the English public speaking domain. English for Specific Purposes, 53, 47–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zheng, C., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Validating an instrument for EFL learners’ sources of self-efficacy, academic self-efficacy and the relation to English proficiency. The Asia–Pacific Education Researcher, 26(6), 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© De La Salle University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Teaching and LearningWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.Department of Teaching and LearningWashington State UniversityTricitiesUSA
  3. 3.Department of LeadershipSport Studies, and Educational/Counseling PsychologyPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations