Young Children’s Conceptions of Learning: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Early Years of Schooling
This cross-sectional research was conducted to probe how 626 Taiwanese children’s conceptions of learning differ by age and gender via drawing. Participants were from the kindergarten, the first grade, and the third grade. A coding scheme categorizing the people, learning domain, and place in the drawings was developed. Chi-square tests were then performed to examine the associations among the children’s three grade levels, gender, and three categories: people, learning domain, and place. The findings showed that the kindergarteners tended to draw more family members as well as family and outdoor scenes, while the third graders tended to draw more school figures as well as classroom and school outdoor scenes. The first graders drew more peers than the third graders did. The kindergarteners drew significantly more social, informal, and playful activities than the other two groups did. The place for literacy learning switched from school (kindergarteners and first graders) to home (third graders). No gender difference was identified. This study provides insight into developing curricula that smooth children’s transition from kindergarten to elementary school.
KeywordsLearning conceptions Early childhood education Gender Cross-sectional study Transition
This work was, in part, financially supported by the Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences of National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.
- Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental process. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 993–1027). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Brooker, L. (2018). Learning to play, or playing to learn? Children’s participation in the cultures of homes and settings. In G. Goodliff, N. Canning, J. Parry, & L. Miller (Eds.), Young children’s play and creativity: Multiple voices (pp. 14–25). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Costa, H. J. T., Barcala-Furelos, R., Abelairas-Gomez, C., & Arufe-Giraldez, V. (2015). The influence of a structured physical education plan on preschool children’s psychomotor development profiles. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(2), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03176190.Google Scholar
- Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Howard, J., & McInnes, K. (2010). Thinking through the challenge of a play-based curriculum: Increasing playfulness via co-construction. In J. Moyles (Ed.), Thinking about play: Developing a reflective approach (pp. 30–44). Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Moll, L. C., Soto-Santiago, S. L., & Schwartz, L. (2013). Funds of knowledge in changing communities. In K. Hall, T. Cremin, B. Comber, & L. C. Moll (Eds.), International handbook of research on children’s literacy, learning and culture (pp. 172–183). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Parmar, P., Harkness, S., & Super, C. M. (2004). Asian and Euro-American parents’ ethnotheories of play and learning: Effects on preschool children’s home routines and school behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sharpe, D. (2015). Your Chi square test is statistically significant: Now what? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(8), 1–10. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=20&n=8.
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar