The Relationship Between Self-efficacy and Self-regulated Learning in One-to-One Computing Environment: The Mediated Role of Task Values
The one-to-one computing environment provides students adaptive and individualized learning experiences, which has the great potential to enhance their learning performances, but it also requires students to actively motivate themselves to self-regulate their learning processes. This study examined the relationships between self-efficacy, task values, and self-regulated learning (SRL) in a one-to-one computing environment. Specifically, how task values (intrinsic value, utility value, and cost) mediate the relationship between students’ self-efficacy and SRL was explored. A total of 299 seventh grade students (176 boys and 123 girls, with an average age of 15) from 8 classrooms of one public school volunteered to participate in this study. They were asked to complete a questionnaire pertaining to their perceptions of task values, self-efficacy, and SRL when using eSchoolbag, a type of one-to-one computing environment, to assist their learning. Results revealed that self-efficacy was a significant predictor of students’ SRL, and their intrinsic value, utility value, and cost. Intrinsic value and utility value both significantly predict students’ SRL. However, the cost of a task did not predict students’ SRL. Utility value significantly mediated the relationship between self-efficacy and SRL, whereas the indirect effect of self-efficacy on SRL mediated by intrinsic value was not significant. The findings from this study provided important practical implications for the teaching and learning in one-to-one computing environment.
KeywordsSelf-regulated learning Self-efficacy Task value One-to-one computing environment
Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The data can be obtained on request in electronic copy by email. The research was conducted in accordance with the journal’s ethical guidelines. All the participation was voluntary. The authors declare that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under considerations for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part.
- Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
- Carter, K. (2001). Laptop lessons: Exploring the promise of one-to-one computing. Technology & Learning, 21(10), 38–49.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to meditaion, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Pajares, F. (2008). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 111–139). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1995). Strategies and metacognitive regulation of strategies: Basic theory and research/knowlege/basic mechanisms affecting learning. In Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers, and policymakers (pp. 27, 45, 83, 323). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2005). Competence perceptions and academic functioning. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 85–104). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Shell, D. F., Colvin, C., & Bruning, R. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, attribution, and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement: Grade-level and achievement-level differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.2066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Taub, M., Azevedo, R., Bradbury, A. E., Millar, G. C., & Lester, J. (2017). Using sequence mining to reveal the efficiency in scientific reasoning during STEM learning with a game-based learning environment. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010.ch4.
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010.ch1.