Comment on: “Challenging Conventional Paradigms in Applied Sports Biomechanics Research”
- 66 Downloads
We read with interest a recent paper by Glazier and Mehdizadeh  on the application of biomechanics within applied sport settings. Their article challenges several conventional techniques and assumptions purportedly prevalent within the sports biomechanics domain. Consequently, two main conclusions are drawn; firstly, that it is inherently flawed to rely on group-based data when working with an athlete to modify their already existing movement pattern and, secondly, that biomechanists and coaches should be more circumspect when interpreting the results of biomechanical research because studies do not account for the pre-existing characteristics of the specific athlete in question. Within the authors’ arguments, several important factors are realised that attest to the ongoing difficulties and complexity that so well defines real-world practice in sport [2, 3]. In this regard, we welcome such attention as a contrast to the often too reductionist approaches of...
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this letter.
Conflict of interest
Howie J. Carson and Dave Collins declare that they have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this letter.
- 1.Glazier PS, Mehdizadeh S. Challenging conventional paradigms in applied sports biomechanics research. Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-1030-1.Google Scholar
- 3.Lyle J. Modelling the complexity of the coaching process: a commentary. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2007;2(4):407–9.Google Scholar
- 6.Carson HJ, Collins D. Effective skill refinement: focusing on process to ensure outcome. Cent Eur J Sport Sci Med. 2014;7(3):5–21.Google Scholar
- 11.Carson HJ, Collins D, Jones B. A case study of technical change and rehabilitation: intervention design and interdisciplinary team interaction. Int J Sport Psychol. 2014;45(1):57–78.Google Scholar
- 15.Christina RW. Motor learning: Future lines of research. In: Safrit MJ, Eckert HM, editors. The cutting edge in physical education and exercise science research. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1987. p. 26–41.Google Scholar
- 24.Hanin Y, Malvela M, Hanina M. Rapid correction of start technique in an Olympic-level swimmer: a case study using old way/new way. J Swim Res. 2004;16(1):11–7.Google Scholar
- 25.Godbout A, Boyd JE. Corrective sonic feedback for speed skating: a case study. 16th international conference on auditory display, Washington. 2010. pp. 23–30.Google Scholar