Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 343–345 | Cite as

Comment on: “The Use of Microtechnology to Quantify the Peak Match Demands of the Football Codes: A Systematic Review”

  • Christopher CarlingEmail author
  • Alan McCall
  • Damian Harper
  • Paul S. Bradley
Letter to the Editor

Dear Editor,

We read with interest a recent review [1] on the use of microtechnology to quantify peak physical match demands in the football codes. That paper provides information across playing standards and positions, and identifies the variables and study designs employed to achieve this. The authors notably conclude that quantification of the peak match demands across the football codes is useful for the prescription of physical conditioning drills to prepare players for the most intense periods of match-play. They also recommend that prescription is specific to code and playing position. In light of their findings and conclusions, it is our view that further debate and additional research are necessary in relation to player monitoring and conditioning.

First, the authors restricted their analysis to studies using ‘wearable’ microtechnologies to analyse peak demands. We are unclear as to the rationale for the omission of several key studies [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] using valid and...

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this letter.

Conflict of interest

Christopher Carling, Alan McCall, Damian Harper and Paul Bradley declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this letter.

References

  1. 1.
    Whitehead S, Till K, Weaving D, Jones B. The use of microtechnology to quantify the peak match demands of the football codes: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2018;48(11):2549–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bradley PS, Dellal A, Mohr M, Castellano J, Wilkie A. Gender differences in match performance characteristics of soccer players competing in the UEFA Champions League. Hum Mov Sci. 2014;33:159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bradley PS, Di Mascio M, Peart D, Olsen P, Sheldon B. High-intensity activity profiles of elite soccer players at different performance levels. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24:2343–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradley PS, Sheldon W, Wooster B, Olsen P, Boanas P, Krustrup P. High-intensity running in English FA Premier League soccer matches. J Sports Sci. 2009;27:159–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carling C, Le Gall F, Dupont G. Analysis of repeated high-intensity running performance in professional soccer. J Sports Sci. 2012;30:325–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Di Mascio M, Bradley PS. Evaluation of the most intense high-intensity running period in English FA premier league soccer matches. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27:909–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fransson D, Krustrup P, Mohr M. Running intensity fluctuations indicate temporary performance decrement in top-class football. Sci Med Football. 2017;1:10–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mohr M, Krustrup P, Andersson H, Kirkendal D, Bangsbo J. Match activities of elite women soccer players at different performance levels. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22:341–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohr M, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J. Match performance of high standard soccer players with special reference to development of fatigue. J Sports Sci. 2003;21:519–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stevens TGA, de Ruiter CJ, Twisk JWR, Savelsbergh GJP, Beek PJ. Quantification of in-season training load relative to match load in professional Dutch Eredivisie football players. Sci Med Football. 2017;1:117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carling C, Bradley P, McCall A, Dupont G. Match-to-match variability in high-speed running activity in a professional soccer team. J Sports Sci. 2016;34:2215–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schimpchen J, Skorski S, Nopp S, Meyer T. Are, “classical” tests of repeated-sprint ability in football externally valid? A new approach to determine in-game sprinting behaviour in elite football players. J Sports Sci. 2015;34:519–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ade J, Fitzpatrick J, Bradley PS. High-intensity efforts in elite soccer matches and associated movement patterns, technical skills and tactical actions. Information for position-specific training drills. J Sports Sci. 2016;34:2205–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bradley PS, Ade JD. Are current physical match performance metrics in elite soccer fit for purpose or is the adoption of an integrated approach needed? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13:656–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bradley PS, Di Mascio M, Mohr M, Fransson D, Wells C, Moreira A, et al. Can modern trends in elite football match demands be translated into novel training and testing modes? Aspetar Sports Med J. 2018;7:46–52.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bradley PS, Evans M, Laws A, Ade JD. ‘Context is King’ when interpreting match physical performances. Football Med Sci. 2018;24:42–5.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dalen T, Ingebrigtsen J, Ettema G, Hjelde GH, Wisløff U. Player load, acceleration, and deceleration during forty-five competitive matches of elite soccer. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30:351–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carling C. Interpreting physical performance in professional soccer match-play: should we be more pragmatic in our approach? Sports Med. 2013;43:655–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Coaching and PerformanceUniversity of Central LancashirePrestonUK
  2. 2.Faculty of Health, Life and Social Sciences, Research Department for Sports and Exercise ScienceEdinburgh Napier UniversityEdinburghUK
  3. 3.Performance and Research DepartmentArsenal Football ClubLondonUK
  4. 4.School of SportYork St John UniversityYorkUK
  5. 5.Research Institute for Sport and Exercise SciencesLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations