Fat-Free Adipose Tissue Mass: Impact on Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2peak) in Adolescents with and without Obesity
Fat-free body mass (FFM) is a surrogate for skeletal muscle mass and is often used for the normalization of several physiological variables (e.g., oxygen uptake). However, FFM includes non-skeletal muscle components such as the fat-free component of adipose tissue fat cells. As the amount of adipose tissue mass increases, the FFM will also increase and be included in the measurement of FFM. Therefore, FFM may not be an appropriate indicator of muscle mass when targeting individuals with a large amount of body fat. This review aimed (1) to examine the fat-free adipose tissue (FFAT) in adolescents with and without obesity and (2) to investigate the impact of FFAT on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) by comparing VO2peak expressed relative to FFM and FFM minus FFAT between adolescents with and without obesity. Calculated FFAT was threefold higher in adolescents with obesity compared to those without obesity (mean ± SD; 6.94 ± 1.40 vs. 2.22 ± 0.58 kg). The VO2peak expressed relative to FFM-FFAT was similar between the two groups (56.5 ± 6.7 vs. 57.4 ± 8.9 ml min−1 kg−1 FFM-FFAT, respectively). On the other hand, VO2peak expressed relative to FFM was approximately 8% different between groups. When normalizing VO2peak by FFM, eliminating the FFAT component from FFM may be needed, especially when comparing groups with different body fat mass.
We would like to thank Scott J. Dankel for his analytical contribution to our manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.
Conflict of interest
Takashi Abe, Jeremy Loenneke, and Robert Thiebaud declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.
- 1.Garrett WE Jr, Kirkendall DT. Exercise and sport science. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2000. p. 319–445.Google Scholar
- 2.McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Exercise physiology, energy, nutrition, and human performance. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 187–819.Google Scholar
- 3.Wilmore JH, Costill DL. Physiology of sport and exercise. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1999. p. 490–633.Google Scholar
- 13.Rowland TW. Effects of obesity on aerobic fitness in adolescent females. Am J Dis Child. 1991;145:764–8.Google Scholar
- 18.Snyder WS, Cook MJ, Nasset ES, et al. Report of the Task Group on Reference Man, ICRP Publication 23. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1975. p. 40–5.Google Scholar
- 20.Thomas LW. The chemical composition of adipose tissue of man and mice. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1962;47:179–88.Google Scholar
- 21.Balasekaran G, Loh MK, Govindaswamy VV, Cai SJ. Omni scale perceived exertion responses in obese and normal weight male adolescents during cycle exercise. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2014;54:186–96.Google Scholar
- 24.Lazzer S, Boirie Y, Bitar A, Petit I, Meyer M, Vermorel M. Relationship between percentage of VO2max and type of physical activity in obese and non-obese adolescents. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005;45:13–9.Google Scholar
- 27.van der Heijden GJ, Wang ZJ, Chu ZD, et al. A 12-week aerobic exercise program reduces hepatic fat accumulation and insulin resistance in obese. Hispanic adolescents. Obesity. 2010;18:384–90.Google Scholar